Industrial Engineering and Management Systems

  • 제6권1호
  • /
  • Pages.49-54
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1598-7248(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6473(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지

Technology Planning-Based Management for the Dissemination of R&D Outcome of Government Supported Research Institutes

  • Choe, Kyungil (School of Industrial and Management Engineering Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • 발행 : 2007.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study deals with technology planning-based management for Basic R&D Programs of government supported research institutes (GRIs). The Korean Research Council for Industrial Science and Technology which consists of major GRIs needs to implement new government policies which focus on the dissemination of R&D outcome, collaborative research, and performance-oriented R&D investment. The major characteristics of technology planning-based management include the hierarchy of market-oriented technology plans and the valuation of core technologies. We also suggest technology classifications and project network diagrams.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, J. C. (2005), A Study on Designing and Implementing the R&D Performance Evaluation System for GRIs Institutional Program as an Engine of Improving R&D Productivity, Policy Study 2004-18, Science & Technology Policy Institute, www.stepi.re.kr.
  2. EIRMA (1997), Technology Roadmapping: Delivering Business Vision, Working Group Report No.52, European Industrial Research Association, www.eirma.asso.fr.
  3. Kim, W. J. and Yang, T. Y. (2005), A Study on the Selection Criteria of Basic R&D Programs, research report, The Entrepreneurship Center, KAIST.
  4. KOCI (2005a), The 2004 Institute Evaluation Report, unpublished report, KOCI, www.koci.re.kr.
  5. KOCI (2005b), Plan for Pilot Programs of Special R&D of Government Supported Research Institutes, internal document.
  6. Kostoff, R. and Schaller, R. (2001), Science and Technology Roadmaps, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.922473
  7. Lee, M. H. (2001), An Analysis of Performance Evalua-tion Indexes of Government Supported Research Institutes, research report, Science & Technology Policy Institute, www.stepi.re.kr.
  8. MOST (2005a), Action Plan for the Effective R&D of Government Supported Research Institutes, internal report, www.most.go.kr.
  9. MOST (2005b), The 2005 Work Plan, internal document, www.most.go.kr.
  10. Neely, J. E. and de Neufville, R. (2001), Hybrid Real Options Valuation of Risky Product Development Projects, International Journal of Technology Policy and Management, 1(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2001.001743
  11. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., Mills, J. F., and Probert, D.R. (2003), Customizing the Technology Roadmapping Approach, Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, 361-369.
  12. Rubenstein, A. H. (2003), Payoffs from Government- Sponsored R&D in the U.S. and Japan, Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, 133-139.
  13. Yoon, M. (2004), Strategic Planning Methodology for National R&D Projects of Engineering Technology: Integrated Procedure of TRM and KM, Policy Study 2004-10, Science & Technology Policy Institute, www.stepi.re.kr.