유우의 산유능력 검정성적과 MUN 농도와의 비교분석

Relationships between Milk Urea Nitrogen Concentration and Milk Components for Herd Management and Control in Gyeong-nam Dairy Cows

  • 유용상 (경상대학교 수의과대학 (동물의학 연구소)) ;
  • 강동준 (건국대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 김철호 (경상남도 축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 김태융 (농림부 가축방역과) ;
  • 강정부 (경상대학교 수의과대학 (동물의학 연구소))
  • You, Yong-Sang (College of Veterinary Medicine (The Institute of Animal Medicine), Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kang, Dong-Joon (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Cheol-Ho (Livestock Promotion Institute, Gyeongsangnamdo) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Yung (Animal Health Division, Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry) ;
  • Kang, Chung-Boo (College of Veterinary Medicine (The Institute of Animal Medicine), Gyeongsang National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.06.30

초록

Milk components analysis was carried out milk yield(MY), milk fat(MF), milk protein(MP), milk urea nitrogen(MUN), milk solid(MS), day of non-pregnant condition(DNPC), and days of primipara(DPRI) involved. Dairy farms were divided high, middle and low groups according to the standard records for milk components. Examination records were divided by farm, parity, year, season and month, the number of samples were 28,957. MUN concentration was below 12 mg and when the MPP was below 3.0%, the days of non-pregnant condition were $94{\pm}10.77$ days but concentration of MUN was under 12 mg and when MPP was above 3.2%, longer period of non-pregnant condtion of $181.3{\pm}9.25$ was noted. The days of gestation of the first calving cow was $495.9{\pm}9.04$ days when the concentration of MUN was below 12mg/dl and MPP was under 3.0%. If the concentration of MUN was 12 mg/dl and when the MPP was over 3.2%, the days of gestation were $511.0{\pm}8.36$ days. It was believed that the concentrations of MPP and MUN have significant effects on the days of non-pregnant condition and the days of gestation. Determination of MY, MF, MS, and MUN was Milkoscan $4,000{\sim}5,000$ Serier(FOSS Electric Co., Copenhagen, Denmark). MUN standard concentration was 12-18(mg/dl) similar to blood urea nitrogen(BUN). Mutual relationship of milk components(MF, SCC, MY, DNPC, MS) and MUN concentration was low in regression analysis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aldrich JM, Muller LD, Varga GA. Nonstructual carbohydrate and protein effects on rumen fermentation, nutrition flow, and performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76: 1091-1105 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77438-X
  2. Batajoo KK, Shaver RD. Impact of nonfiber carbohydrate on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1993; 77: 1580-1588 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77100-9
  3. Broderick GA, Clayton MK. A statistical evaluation of animal and nutritional factors influencing concentrations of milk urea nitrogen. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 2964-2971 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76262-3
  4. Butler WR, Calaman JJ, Beam Sw. Plasma and milk urea nitrogen in relation to pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cattle. J Anim Sci 1996; 74: 858-865 https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.744858x
  5. Carlsson J, Pehrson B. The relationships between seasonal variations in the concentration of urea in bulk milk and the production and fertility of dairy herds. J Vet Med Assoc 1993; 40: 205-212 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1993.tb00618.x
  6. Carroll DJB, Barten BA, Anderson GW, et al. Influence of protein intake and feeding strategy on reproductive performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1997; 71: 3470-3478 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79953-1
  7. Depeters EJ, Ferguson JD. Nonprotein nitrogen and protein distribution in the milk of cows. J Dairy Sci 1992; 75: 31923209 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78085-0
  8. Eicher R, Bouchard E, Bigras-Poulin M. Factor affecting milk urea nitrogen and protein concentration in Quebec dairy cows. Pre Vet Med 1999; 39: 53-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(98)00139-1
  9. Elrod CC, Butler WR. Reduction of fertility and alteration of ut+erine pH in heifers fed excess ruminally degradable protein. J Anim Sci 1993; 71; 694-701
  10. Ferguson JD, Chalupa W. Impact of protein nutrition on reproduction in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 746-766 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79168-2
  11. Harris B Jr. Using milk urea nitrogen and blood urea values as management tools. In : Biotechology in the feed industry, Lyons TP and Jacques KA eds. Nottinham. United Kingdom: Nottingham University Press. 1997
  12. Hof G, Vervoorn MD, Lenaers PJ, Tamminga S. Milk urea nitrogen as a tool to monitor the protein nutrition of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 3333-3340 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76309-4
  13. Jonker JS, Kohn RA, Erdman RA. Milk urea nitrogen Target concentration for dairy cows fed according to national research council recommendations. J Dairy Sci 1997; 82: 1261-1273 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75349-X
  14. Kirchgessner M. Kreuzer M. Roth-Maier DA. Milk urea and protein content to diagnose energy and protein malnutrition of dairy cows. Arch Anim Nut 1986; 36; 192-197 https://doi.org/10.1080/17450398609425260
  15. Larson SF, Butler WR, Currie WB. Reduced fertility associated with low progesterone postbreeding and increased milk urea nitrogen in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 1288-1295 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76058-2
  16. Lean LJ, Bruss ML, Baldwin RL, Troutt HE Bovine ketosis: a review.. Epidemiology and pathogenesis. Vet Bull 1991; 61:1209
  17. Nelson AJ. Infonnation needs of the dairy industry for health and nutrition management. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77: 1984-1991 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77144-7
  18. OItner R, Wiktorsson H. Urea concentration in milk and blood as influenced feeding varying amounts of protein and energy to dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci 1997; 10: 457-467 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(83)90073-8
  19. Pedron O , Cheli F, Senatoren D. Effect of body condition score at calving on perfonnance, some blood parameteζ and milk fatty acid composition in dairy in daiη cows. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76: 2528 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77588-8
  20. Poore MH, Moore JA, Swingle RS, Eck TP , Brown WH. Response of lactating Holstein cows to diets varying in fiber source and ruminal starch degradability. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76: 2235-2243 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77560-8
  21. Purnomoadi A, Nakai F, Higuchi K, Ueda K, Enjishi O, Kurihara M, Terada F, Abe A. The use ofnear infrared spectra of urine for monitoring milk urea nitrogen in dairy cattle. The 8th World Conference of Animal Production Proceedings, Contributed paper 1997; 2: 780-7
  22. Rodriguez LA, Stallings CC, Herbein JH, Mc Gillard ML. Diurnal variation in milk and plasma urea nitrogen in Holstein and Jersey cows in responce to degradable dietary protein and added fat. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 3368-3376 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76312-4
  23. Ropstad E, Refsdal AO. Herd reproductive perfonnance related to urea concentration in bulk milk. Acta Vet Scand 1987; 28: 55-63
  24. Roseler DK, Ferguson JD, Sniffen CJ. Dietary protein degradability effect on plasma and milk urea nitrogen and milk nonprotein nitrogen in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1997; 76: 525-534
  25. Rukkwamsuk T, Kruip TAM, Meijer L. Hepatic fatty acid composition in periparturient dairy cows with fatty liver induced by intake of a high energy diet in the dry period. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82: 280-287 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75234-3
  26. Shelton KMF, Abreu GD, Hunter MG, et al. Luteal inadequancy during the luteal phase of subfertille cows. J Reprod 1997; 90: 1-8
  27. Sondennan JP, Larson LL. Effect of dietary protein and exogenous gonadotropin releasing honnone on circulating progesterone concentrations and perfonnance of Holstein cow. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 2179 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79343-7
  28. Tveit B, Lingaas F, Svendsen M, Sjaastad OV. Etiology of acetonemia in norwegian cattle : Effect of ketogenic silage, season, energy level, and genetic factors. J Dairy Sci 1992; 75:2421 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78003-5
  29. 문진산. 손창호. 신종봉. 주이석. 강현미. 김종만. 지방. 단백질. 요소태질소 유검정 성적을 활용한 유우 건강관리 요령 대한수의학회 1997; 38(7): 638-652
  30. 문진산. 손창호. 이보균. 주이석. 강현미. 김종만. 김병태. 문현식. 유우에서 유성분 분석을 통한 우군 건강관리프로 그램의 개발 대한수의학회지 2002; 42(4): 485-493
  31. 문진산. 임숙경. 장금찬. 윤용덕. 이보균. 손창호. 주이석. 박용호. 위성환. 젖소에서 유성분 분석을 통한 영양상태 평 가 및 건강관리에 관한 연구 :1. 우유중 단백질 및 요소태 질소 분석시 변화 요인. 한국수의공중보건학회지 2000; 24(2): 105-111
  32. 문진산, 임숙경, 장금찬, 윤용덕, 이보균, 손창호, 주이석, 박용호, 위성환. 젖소에서 유성분 분석을 통한 영양상태 평 가 및 건강관리에 관한 연구 : 2 . 우유중 단백질과 요소 태질소 농도에 영향을 주는 생리적 요인. 한국수의공중보 건학회지 2000; 24(2): 113-122
  33. 손용석 . MUN을 이용한 유우 영양관리의 최적화에 관한 연구. 고려대학교 자연자원연구소 2000; 60-6 1
  34. 유용상, 김태융, 검철호, 강정부. 경남지역 유우의 산유능 력 검증. 한국임상수의학회지 2004; 21(4) 355-362