The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

MORPHOMETRICS OF ALVEOLAR PROCESS AND ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES AROUND INFERIOR MAXILLARY SINUS FOR MAXILLARY IMPLANTATION

임플랜트 시술을 위한 치조돌기와 상악동 주변 구조물의 형태계측적 연구

  • Park, Ju-Jin (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Soo (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Paik, Doo-Jin (Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Won-Hee (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Yoo, Dong-Yeob (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 박주진 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이영수 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 백두진 (한양대학교 의과대학 해부.세포생물학교실) ;
  • 박원희 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 유동엽 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Published : 2007.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: Following tooth loss, the edentulous alveolar process of maxilla is affected by irreversible reabsorption process, with progressive sinus pneumatization leads to leaving inadquate bone height for placement of endosseous implants. Grafting the floor of maxillary sinus by sinus lifting surgery and augmentation of autologous bone or alternative bone material is a method of attaining sufficient bone height for maxillary implants placement and has proven to be a highty successful. Purpose: This study was undertaken to clarify the morphometric characteristics of inferior maxillary sinus and alveolar process for installation of implants. Material and method: Nineteen skulls (37 sinuses, 10M / 9F) obtained from the collection of the department of anatomy and cell biology of Hanyang medical school were studied. The mean age of the deceased was 69.9 years (range 44 to 88 years). The distance between alveolar border and inferior sinus margin at each tooth, the height of alveolar process and the thickness of cortical bone of the outer and inner table of alveolar process and the inferior wall of maxillary sinus were measured. Results and Conclusion: 1. The septum of inferior maxillary sinus were observe 28 sides (76.%) and located at the third molar (52.6%) and the second molar (26.3%). The deepest points of inferior border of maxillary sinus were located the first or second molar. The distance between alveolar margin and the deepest point of inferior maxillary sinus is $9.7{\pm}4.9mm$. 2. The length of the outer table of alveolar process were $4.9\sim28.2mm$ and the shortest point was between the first and the second molors. The thickness of them were $0.9\sim3.2mm$. The length of the inner table of alveolar process were $7.4\sim25.8mm$ and the shortest point was between the first and the second molars. The thickness of the were $0.9\sim4.6mm$. The results of this study are useful anatomical data for installing of maxillary implants.

Keywords

References

  1. Hong SB, Chai GJ, Jung UW, Kim CS. Clinical evaluation of Branemak Ti-Unite implant and ITI SLA implant in post maxillary area with sinus elevation technique. J Korean Acad Periodont 2005;35:813-822 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2005.35.4.813
  2. Razavi R, Zena RB, Khan Z, Gould AR. Anatomic site evaluation of edentulous maxillae for dental implant placement. J Prosthodont 1995;4:90-94 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1995.tb00322.x
  3. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lafting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  4. Ulm CW, Solar P, Gsellmann B, Matejka M, Watzek G. The edentulous maxillary alveolar process in the region of the maxillary sinus - a study of physical dimension. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995a;24:279-282 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(95)80029-8
  5. Toffler M. Minimally invasive sinus floor elevation procedures. N Y State Dent J 2004;70:38-44
  6. Ulm CW, Solar P, Krennmair G, Matejka M, Watzek G. Incidence and suggested surgical management of septa in sinus-lift procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995b;10:462-465
  7. Kraut R, Kessler H. Quantification of bone in dental implant sites after composite grafting of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:238-242 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90225-5
  8. Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: Anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology-eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990). J Oral Implantol 1990;16:199-209
  9. Boss LP, Taylor TD. Problems associated with implant rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:117- 126
  10. Tidwell JK, Blijdorp PJ, Stoelinga PJW, Brouns JB, Hinderks F. Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:204-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80219-X
  11. Fredholm U, Bolin A, Andersson L. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique. Swed Dent J 1993;17:103-109
  12. Kwak HH, Park HD, Yoon HR, Kang MK, Koh KS, Kim HJ. Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:382-388 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.012
  13. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616
  14. Misch CE. Density of bone: Effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral Implant 1990;6:23-31
  15. Vinter I, Krmpotic-Nemanic J, Jalsovec D. Verschwindet der processus alveolaris des oberkiefers immer nach dem Zahnausfall. Laryngorhinootologie 1993;72:605-607(in German) https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-997963
  16. Lustmann J, Lewinstein I. Interpositional bone grafting technique to widen narrow maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:568-577
  17. Barone A, Crespi RC, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Covani U. Maxillary sinus augmentation: Histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:519-525
  18. Shin KS, Kim YD. A case of mucopyocele of septated Maxillary sinus. J Korean Ophthalmological Society 1990;31:814-817
  19. Schatz CJ, Becker TS. Normal CT anatomy of the paranasal sinuses. Radiol Clin North Am 1984;22:107-118
  20. Bhatia PL, Gupta SK, Sasibabu K, Varanasi BS. Clinical significance of completely subdivided maxillary antrum. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;44:679-683 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90376-0
  21. Underwood AS. An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus. A Anat Physiol 44: 354-369, 1910 cited from Ulm et al. (1995b)
  22. Poyton HG. Maxillary sinuses and the oral radiologist. Dent Radiogr Photogr 1972;45:43-50
  23. Krennmair G, Ulm C, Lugmayr H. Maxillary sinus septa : incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:261-265 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(97)80063-7
  24. Krennmair G, Ulm CW, Lugmayr H, Solar P. The incidence, location, and Height of maxillary sinus septa in the edentulous and dentate maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:667-671 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90427-5
  25. Ko KJ, Lee SR. A radiographic study on the morphology of maxillary sinus in adolescents and adults. J Korean Acad Dent Radiology 1984;14:17-26
  26. Smiler DG, Johnson PW, Lozada JL, Misch CE, Rosenlicht JL. Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants. Treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:151-186
  27. van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Krekeler G, Tuinzing DB. Sinus floor elevation and grafting with autogenous bone from the iliac crest. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:429-435 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090608.x
  28. Hurzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quinones CR. Reduction of the severely resorped maxilla with dental implants with augmentated maxillary sinus. 5 year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:466-475
  29. Misch CE. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants: Organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantol 1987;4:49-58
  30. Lee YC. A sinus floor elevation method using maxillary tuberosity bone. J Korea Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;18:236-244
  31. Kwak HH, Yoon HL, Hur KS, Kang MG, Park HD, Koh KS, Park CS, Kim KD, Kim HJ. Topography of the Inferior Wall of the Maxillary Sinus in Koreans. Korean J Physical Anthropology 2001;14:137-149 https://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2001.14.2.137
  32. Harrison DF. Oro-antral fistula. Br J Clin Pract 1961;15:169-174
  33. Kasabah S, Slezak R, Simunek A, Krug J, Lecaro MC. Evaluation of the accuracy of panoramic radiograph in the definition of maxillary sinus septa. Acta Medica 2002;45:173-175
  34. Kanda S. Quantitative analysis in maxillofacial regions using computed tomography. J Jpn Stomatol Soc 1992;4:793- 794(in Japanese)
  35. Taguchi M. Development of maxillary sinus in childhood. J Iwate Med Ass 40: 363-372, 1988 cited from Ariji et al. (1994)