대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제45권3호
  • /
  • Pages.295-302
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE FRACTURE STRENGTH OF METAL-CERAMIC VERSUS COMPOSITE RESIN-VENEERED METAL CROWNS IN CEMENT-RETAINED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED CROWNS UNDER VERTICAL COMPRESSIVE LOAD

  • Pae, Ahran (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Jeon, Kyung-A (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Rae (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. Fracture of the tooth-colored superstructure material is one of the main prosthetic complications in implant-supported prostheses. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture strength between the cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns and the indirect composite resinveneered metal crowns under the vertical compressive load. Material and methods. Standard implants of external type (AVANA IFR 415 Pre-mount; Osstem Co., Busan, Korea) were embedded in stainless steel blocks perpendicular to their long axis. Customized abutments were fabricated using plastic UCLA abutments (Esthetic plastic cylinder; Osstem Co., Busan, Korea). Thirty standardized copings were cast with non-precious metal (Rexillium III, Pentron, Walling ford, Conn., USA). Copings were divided into two groups of 15 specimens each (n = 15). For Group I specimens, metal-ceramic crowns were fabricated. For Group II specimens, composite resin-veneered (Sinfony, 3M-ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) metal crowns (Sinfony-veneered crowns) were fabricated according to manufacturer's instructions. All crowns were temporary cemented and vertically loaded with an Instron universal testing machine (Instron 3366, Instron Corp., Norwood, MA, USA). The maximum load value (N) at the moment of complete failure was recorded and all data were statistically analyzed by independent sample t-test at the significance level of 0.05. The modes of failure were also investigated with visual analysis. Results. The fracture strength of Sinfony-veneered crowns ($2292.7{\pm}576.0N$) was significantly greater than that of metal-ceramic crowns ($1150.6{\pm}268.2N$) (P < 0.05). With regard to the failure mode, Sinfony-veneered crowns exhibited adhesive failure, while metal-ceramic crowns tended to fracture in a manner that resulted in combined failure. Conclusion. Sinfony-veneered crowns demonstrated a significantly higher fracture strength than that of metal-ceramic crowns in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Taylor TD, Agar JR Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2002:88:89- 95 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.126818
  2. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: Length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:416-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90379-3
  3. Scheller H, Urgell JP, Kultje C, Klineberg I, Goldberg PV, Peter SM. A 5-year multicenter study on implantsupported single crown restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:212-8
  4. Mericske-Stern R, Grutter L, Rosch R, Mericske E. Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complications of single tooth replacements by non-submerged implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:309-18 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004309.x
  5. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:299-302
  6. Strub JR, Stiffler S, Scharer P. Causes of failure following oral rehabilitation: Biologic versus technical factors. Quintessence Int 1998;19:215-22
  7. Yildirim M, Fischer H, Marx R, Edelhoff D. In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported allceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:325-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00514-6
  8. Scherrer SS, Kelly JR, Quinn GD, Xu K. Fracture toughness of a dental porcelain determined by fractographic analysis. Dent Mater 1999;15:342-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00055-X
  9. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00928.x
  10. Fuhrer N. Restoring posterior teeth with a novel indirect composite resin system. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:124-30 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00930.x
  11. Jones RM, Goodacre CJ, Moore BK, Dykema RW. A comparison of the physical properties of four prosthetic veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:38-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90105-4
  12. Jones RM, Moore BK, Goodacre CJ, Munoz-Viveros CA. Microleakage and shear bond strength of resin and porcelain veneers bonded to cast alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:221-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90165-S
  13. Shue SL, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD. The effect of metal retentive designs on resin veneer retention. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:297-305 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90044-8
  14. Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:311-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70131-3
  15. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:167-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70151-4
  16. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Ledwinsky E, Handel G. Fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of conventionally cemented fiber-reinforced composite three-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:467-72
  17. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X
  18. Gracis SE, Nicholls JI, Chalupnik JD, Yuodelis RA. Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants. Int J Prothodont 1991;4:282-91
  19. International standard. Dentistry-Fatique test for endosseous dental implants. ISO 14801 2003 (E)
  20. Loose M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fiber-reinforced composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1998;6:55-62
  21. Andrade Tarozzo LS, Chiarello G, de Mattos M, Ribeiro RF, Semprini M. Comparison of retentive systems for composites used as alternatives to porcelain in fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:572-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00180-X
  22. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent Mater 2003;19:393-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00082-9
  23. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:443-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90455-8
  24. Waltimo A, Kononen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:171-5
  25. Helkimo E, Ingervall B. Bite force and functional state of the masticatory system in young men. Swed Dent J 1978;2:167-75
  26. Papazoglou E, Brantley WA, Mitchell JC, Cai Z, Carr AB. New high palladium casting alloys: Studies of the interface with porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:315-22
  27. Takahashi Y, Hisama K, Chai J, Shimizu H, Kido H, Ukon S. Probability of failure of highly filled indirect resin veneered implant-supported restorations: An in vitro study. Int J Prothodont 2002;15:179-82
  28. Smith TB, Kelly JR, Tesk JA. In vitro fracture behavior of ceramic and metal-ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont 1994;3:138-44 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00144.x
  29. Harrington Z, McDonald A, Knowles J. An in vitro study to investigate the load at fracture of Procera allceram crowns with various thickness of occlusal veneer porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:54-8
  30. Kelly JR, Giodano R, Pober R, Cima MJ. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics; Clinically failed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:430-40
  31. Matinlinna JP, Ozcan M, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The effect of a 3-methacryloxy propyltrimethoxysilane and vinyltriisopropoxysilaneblend and tris (3-trimethoxysilpropyl) isocyanurate on the shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium metal. Dent Mater 2004;20:804-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.009
  32. Watanabe I, Kurz KS, Kabcenell JL, Okabe T. Effect of sandblasting and silicoating on bond strength of polymer-glass composite to cast titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:462-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70035-1
  33. Lehmann F, Eickemeyer G, Rammelsberg P. Fracture resistance of metal-free composite crowns: effects of fiber reinforcement, thermal cycling, and cementation technique. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:1-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.024
  34. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Latzel D, Kreisler T. Comparison of three types of fiber-reinforced composite molar crowns on their resistance and marginal adaptation. J Dent 2001;29:187-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00007-0
  35. Drummond JL, Bapna MS. Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin. Dent Mater 2003;19:226-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00034-9