DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Laboratory Study of the Effect of Phytoplankton Concentration, Water Flow and Their Interaction on the Growth of the Sandy Shore Suspension Feeding Clam Gafrarium tumidum

  • Shin, P.K.S. (Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Cheung, S.G. (Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong)
  • 발행 : 2007.05.31

초록

The effects of water flow rate and phytoplankton concentration on the growth of the sandy shore clam Gafrarium tumidum was investigated in a laboratory flume study using a $3{\times}3$ factorial design. After 60 days, shell length, shell weight and tissue dry weight increased significantly with phytoplankton concentration. For the effect of flow rate, growth was faster when flow rate increased from low to medium level; further increases in flow rate, however, either did not sustain faster growth or resulted in a reduction in growth. The condition index (CI) of a standard-sized clam was significantly higher at low flow rate than at medium and high flow rates and was negatively correlated with phytoplankton concentration. The uncoupled growth of shell and tissue in response to flow rate and phytoplankton concentration may be adaptations to low food environments, so that energy can either be stored to sustain life or reserved for gametogenesis during the reproductive period.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cahalan JA, Sidall SE, Luckenbach MW. 1989. Effects of flow velocity, food concentration and particle flux on growth rates of juvenile bay scallops Argopecten irradians. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 129: 45-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(89)90062-2
  2. Cheung S-G, Shin PKS. 2007. Growth responses of the filter-feeding clam Gafrarium tumidum to water flow: a field manipulation experiment. J Ecol Field Biol 30: 109-119 https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2007.30.2.109
  3. Eckman JE, Peterson CH, Cahalan JA. 1989. Effects of flow speed, turbulence, and orientation on growth of juvenile bay scallops Argopecten irradians concentricus (Say). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 132: 123-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(89)90219-0
  4. Emerson CW, Grant J, Mallet A, Carver C. 1994. Growth and survival of sea scallops Placopecten magellanicus: Effects of culture depth. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 108: 119-132
  5. French RH 1994. Open-channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, Singapore
  6. Grant J. 1996. The relationship of bioenergetics and the environment to the field growth of cultured bivalves. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 200: 239-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02660-3
  7. Grizzle RE, Langan R, Howell WH. 1992. Growth responses of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs to changes in water flow: differences between siphonate and non-siphonate taxa. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 162: 213-228 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(92)90202-L
  8. Grizzle RE, Morin PJ. 1989. Effect of tidal currents, seston, and bottom sediments on growth of Mercenaria mercenaria: results of a field experiment. Mar Biol 102: 85-93 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391326
  9. Hinds WC. 1982. Aerosol Technology. John Wiley & Sons, New York
  10. Jorgensen BC, Famme P, Kristensen HS, Larsen PS, Mohlenberg F, Riisgard HU. 1986. The bivalve pump. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 34: 69-77
  11. Judge ML, Coen LD, Heck KL. 1992. The effect of long-term alteration of in situ water currents on the growth of Mercenaria mercenaria in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Limnol Oceanogr 37: 1550-1559 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.7.1550
  12. Kirby-Smith WW. 1972. Growth of the bay scallop: The influence of experimental currents. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 8: 7-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(72)90051-2
  13. Peterson CH, Black R. 1991. Preliminary evidence for progressive food depletion in incoming tide over a broad tidal sand flat. Est Coast Shelf Sci 32: 405-413 https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(91)90052-D
  14. Pinckney J, Zingmark RG. 1991. Effects of tidal stage and sun angles on intertidal benthic microalgal productivity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 76: 81-89
  15. Widdows J, Navarro JM. 2007. Influence of current speed on clearance rate, algal cell depletion in the water column and resuspension of biodeposits of cockles (Cerastoderma edule). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 343: 44-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.11.011
  16. Wildish DJ, Kristmanson DD. 1984. Importance to mussels of the benthic boundary layer. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41: 1618-1625 https://doi.org/10.1139/f84-200
  17. Wildish DJ, Kristmanson DD. 1985. Control of suspension feeding bivalve production by current speed. Helgo Meeresunters 39: 237-243 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01992771
  18. Wildish DJ, Kristmanson DD. 1997. Benthic Suspension Feeders and Flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  19. Wildish DJ, Kristmanson DD, Hoar RL, DeCoste AM, McCormich SD, White AW. 1987. Giant scallop feeding and growth response to flow. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 113: 207-220 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(87)90101-8
  20. Wildish DJ, Miyares MP. 1990. Filtration rate of blue mussels as a function of flow velocity: preliminary experiments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 142: 213-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(90)90092-Q
  21. Winter JE. 1978. A review of the knowledge of suspension-feeding in lamellibranchiate bivalves, with special reference to artificial aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 13: 1-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(78)90124-2
  22. Wong W-H, Cheung S-G. 1999. Feeding behaviour of the green mussel, Perna viridis (L.): Responses to variation in seston quantity and quality. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 236: 191-207 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00207-X
  23. Wong W-H, Cheung S-G. 2001. Feeding rates and scope for growth of green mussels, Perna viridis (L.) and their relationship with food availability in Kat O, Hong Kong. Aquaculture 193: 123-137 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00478-6