References
- Payne N, Chilcott J, McGoogan E. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1-73
- Linder J. Recent advances in thin-layer cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:24-32 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199801)18:1<24::AID-DC5>3.0.CO;2-U
- Sahebali S, Depuydt CE, Segers K, et al. p16INK4a as an adjunct marker in liquid-based cervical cytology. Int J Cancer 2004;108:871-6 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11589
- Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, Corkill ME, McIntosh KM, Inhorn SL. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:278-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00228-7
- Abulafia O, Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90:137-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00176-8
- Schledermann D, Ejersbo D, Hoelund B. Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid-based cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:780-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20515
- Lee KC, Choi HS, Kim HJ, et al. The Comparison of conventional Pap Smear with ThinPrep Pap Smear in detecting HSIL and cervix cancer. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2002;45:753-8
- Kim YR, Kim YT, Kim SH, Kim JH, Kim JW, Park YW. Comparative analysis of conventional Papanicolaou smear, fluid-based thin-layer method and cervicography. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2005;48:2932-40
- Park YW, Chung JH, Lee HM. A Comparison of the availability of the urine ThinPrep test and urine cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. Korean J Urol 2003;44:734-8
- Ylagan LR, Zhai J. The value of ThinPrep and cytospin preparation in pleural effusion cytological diagnosis of mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2005;32:137-44 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20200
- Gabriel C, Achten R, Drijkoningen M. Use of liquid-based cytology in serous fluids: a comparison with conventional cytopreparatory techniques. Acta Cytol 2004;48:825-35 https://doi.org/10.1159/000326453
- Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-9 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114
- Jang J, Kim J, Cho KJ, Khang SK, Nam JH, Gong G. A comparison of AutoCyte PREP with matched conventional Smear in cervicovaginal cytology. Korean J Cytopathol 2002;13:8-13
- Park JM, Lee JG, Suh IS. Clinical efficacy of manual liquidbased cervicovaginal cytology preparation: Comparative study with conventional papanicolaou test. Korean J Cytopathol 2005;16:10-7
- Nam JH, Kim HS, Lee JS, Choi HS, Min KW, Park CS. A comparison of modified MonoPrep2 of liquid-based cytology with ThinPrep Pap test. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:693-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.047
- Maksem JA, Dhanwada V, Trueblood JE, et al. Testing automated liquid-based cytology samples with a manual liquid-based cytology method using residual cell suspensions from 500 ThinPrep cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:391-6 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20466
- Mullink H, Walboomers JM, Tadema TM, Jansen DJ, Meijer CJ. Combined immuno- and non-radioactive hybridocytochemistry on cells and tissue sections: influence of fixation, enzyme pre-treatment, and choice of chromogen on detection of antigen and DNA sequences. J Histochem Cytochem 1989;37:603-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/37.5.2467928