References
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, D. C
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
- Bauer, H. (1992). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL
- Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedure, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education, (pp.289-325) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc
- Bruce, B. C., & Bishop, A. P. (2002). Using the web to support inquiry-based literacy development. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(8), 706-714
- Bruner, J. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31 (1), 21
- Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers (1907). A consideration of the principles that should determine the courses in biology in the secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7, 241-247 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1907.tb01009.x
- Chalmers, A. F. (1982). What is this thing called science? (2nd ed.). Queensland, Australia: University of Queensland Press
- Collins, A. (1986). A sample dialogue based on a theory of inquiry teaching (Tech. Rep. No. 367). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc. ED 266-423
- Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23, 139-140
- DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press
- Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.). (pp. 365-395) Mechanisms of insight. Cambridge MA: MIT press
- Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The invivo/ invitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 334-339 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01698-3
- Finley, F. N., & Pocovi, M. C. (2000). Considering the scientific method of inquiry. In J. Minstrell and E. H. van Zee (Eds.) Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science, American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, DC
- Gilmer, P. J., & Alli, P. (1998). Action experiments: Are students learning physical science? In S. R. Steinberg & J. L. Kinchloe (Eds.). Students as researchers: Creating classrooms that matter. (pp. 199-211), London: Falmer Press
- Gooding, D. (1992). The procedural turn. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol.15: Cognitive models of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
- Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. (2007). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Analysis of a conference. Science & Education, 16(2), 141-166 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-2865-z
- Harwood, W. S. (2004a). An activity models for scientific inquiry. The Science Teacher, 71(1), 44-46
- Harwood, W. S. (2004b). A new model for inquiry: Is the scientific method dead? Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(7), 29-33
- Harwood, W. S., Reiff, R., & Phillipson, T. (2005). Putting the puzzle together: Scientists' metaphors for scientific inquiry. Science Educator, 14(1), 25-30
- Haury, D. L. (1993). Teaching science through inquiry. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathmatics and Environmental Education. ED 359 048
- Holmes, L. (1985). Lavoisier and the chemistry of life: An exploration of scientific creativity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
- Kimball, M. E. (1967-1968). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 110-120 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660050204
- Kerlinger, F. N. (1970). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
- Klopfer, L. E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research for Science Teaching, 6, 87-95 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660060116
- Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, K., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Science, 7(3&4), 313-350 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0703&4_3
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
- Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2), 1-11
- Linn, M. C. (1992). The computer as learning partner: Can computer tools teach science. In K. Sheingold, L. G. Robert & S. M. Malcolm (Eds.). This year in school science, 1991: Technology for Teaching and Learning, pp. 31-69
- Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R. D., & Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 7-15 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575812
- Loucks-Horsely, S. (1997). Reforming teaching and reforming staff development. Journal of Staff Development. 18, 20-22
- Lunetta, V. N. (1997). The role of the laboratory in school science. In D. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69, 34-37
- McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 10-15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10205.x
- Metz, K. E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's sciences instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65, 93-128 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065002093
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
- National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s. (An NSTA position statement). Washington, DC: Author
- National Society for the Study of Education. (1947). Science education in American schools: Forty sixth yearbook of the NSSE. Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press
- Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do the scientist think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 15: Cognitive models of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
- Nersessian, N. J. (1995). Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics. Science & Education, 4, 203-226 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486621
- Novak, A. (1964). Scientific inquiry. Bioscience, 14, 25-28
- Rakow, S. J. (1986). Teaching science as inquiry. Fastback 246. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. ED 275 506
- Reiff, R., Harwood, W. S., & Phillipson, T. (2002). A scientific method based upon research scientists' conception of scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the AETS, Charlotte, NC
- Robinson, W. R. (2004). The inquiry wheel, an alternative to the scientific method. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(6), 791-792 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed081p791
- Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Roth, W. M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 709-736 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R
- Roth, W. M., McGinn, M., & Bowen, G. M. (1998). How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 25-48
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition & Instruction, 9, 177-199 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0903_1
- Schank, R. C., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. (1994). The design of goal based scenarios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 305-345 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0304_2
- Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as inquiry: In The teaching of science, 1-103, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA
- Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2005). The importance of involving high-school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of chemical literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 323-344 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266191
- Sorenson-Johnson, K. (2001). Connecting components of scientific inquiry and instructional strategies for teaching students in urban classrooms: A Literature Review. NOVAtions, 1
- Spiegel, S. A. (1997). Understanding science teacher enhancement programs: Essential components and a model. Unpublished Dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI
- Taylor, C. (1962). Some educational implications of creativity research findings. School Science and Mathematics, 62, 593-606 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1962.tb13183.x
- Tweney, R. D. (1985). Faraday's discovery of induction: A cognitive approach. In D. Gooding & F. James(Eds.), Faraday rediscovered. New York: Stockton Press
- Variano, E., & Taylor, K. (2006). Inquiry in limnology lessons. The Science Teacher, 73(5), 36-39
- White, Y. B., & Frederiksen, R. J. (1995). The Thinker Tools inquiry project: Making scientific inquiry accessible to students and teachers (Causal models research group report No. 95-02). Berkeley: University of California, School of Education
- White, Y. B., & Frederiksen, R. J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition & Instruction, 16(1), 3-118 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
- White, B., Frederiksen, J., Frederiksen, T., Eslinger, E., Loper, S., & Collins, A. (2002). Inquiry Island: affordances of a multi-agent environment for scientific inquiry and reflective learning. In P. Bell, R. Stevens and T. Satwicz (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS). October 24-26. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum