A Study on features and Interpretation of Placeness of Rem Koolhaas' Architecture

렘 콜하스 건축의 장소적 특성과 해석에 관한 연구

  • 박형진 (조선대학교 디자인학부 실내디자인) ;
  • 김문덕 (건국대학교 실내디자인학과)
  • Published : 2007.04.30

Abstract

This study analyzes the place of modem architecture based on the place theory of C. N, Schultz. For applying Schultz's theory to the modern architecture, It is required to examine the modern cityscape, features of inner space of architecture and features of program. By analyzing the avant-garde architecture of Rem Koolhaas on such basis, the potentiality of placeness of modern architecture could be verified and the alternatives would be searched. It is inferred that the placeness features of Rem Koolhaas' public architecture is under the influence of the interpretation of program based on the humane background rather than the physical aspects of surroundings. The inner space shows the non-linear features, the metaphor of city. The obscurity of physical boundary illustrates the flexible features with ambiguous boundary. Consequently, the inner space expresses the surreal atmosphere that doesn't match the purposes of usage of architecture, the traditional concept. The outer shape is recognized as the by-product from the interpretation of internal program rather than it considered the surrounding context. The outer shape has the relatively simple formative shape and contrasts against the complicated inner space by using the non-physical materials. It is found that Koolhaas' architecture doesn't pursue the features of placeness of traditional concept. However, It is inferred that his architecture has the possibility of placeness by attaching the meaning through the social roles of each architecture. It gives the substantial suggestion to the modern architecture that can't easily acquire the placeness of traditional concept due to the environment of modern city.

Keywords

References

  1. 봉일범, 누적도시, 시공문화사, 2005
  2. 전경갑, 현대와 탈현대의 사회사상, 한길사, 1996
  3. Heidegger, Martin, translated by Albert Hofstadter, Poetry, Language, Thought, New York, Harper & Row, 1971
  4. OMA/Rem Koolhass, EL Croquis 53+79, 1999
  5. OMA, Koolhass, Rem and Mau, Bruce, S,M,L,XL, THE MONACELLI PRESS, 1995
  6. Piaget, Jean, Translated M. Piercy and D. E. Berlyne, The Psychology of Intelligence, Routledge, New York, 2002
  7. Benturi, Robert, 라스베가스의 교훈, 태림문화사, 1983
  8. Heidegger, Martin, 이기상 역, 존재와 시간, 까치, 2006
  9. Koolhass, Rem, 김원갑 역, 정신착란증의 뉴욕, 태림문화사, 1998
  10. Norberg-Schulz, Christian, 정영수 역, 건축론, 세진사, 1987
  11. Norberg-Schulz, Christian, 김광현 역, 실존.공간.건축, 태림문화사, 2002
  12. Norberg-Schulz, Christian, 민경호 외 3인 역, 장소의 혼, 태림문화사, 2001
  13. Norberg-Schulz, Christian, 이재훈 역, 거주의 개념, 태림문화사, 1995
  14. Piaget, Jean, 김태수 역, 구조주의 이론, 인간사랑, 1994
  15. Relph, Edwrad, 김동국 역, 근대도시경관, 태림문화사, 1999
  16. Savage, Mike 외 1인, 자본주의 도시와 근대성, 한울, 2002
  17. Summerson, John, 18세기건축, 태림문화사, 1993
  18. 김경훈, 렘콜하스의 '거대함'에 관한 연구, 서울대석론, 1997
  19. 김석영, OMA 건축가의 작품에 나타난 실내공간의 랜드스케이프적 특성에 관한 연구, 건국대 석론, 2001
  20. 박정대, 현대건축의 비선형 현상에 관한 연구, 서울대 석론, 1997
  21. 김문덕, 네덜란드 근대건축의 상황과 전개, PLUS 2000. 01/ 2000. 11
  22. SPACE, 2005. 01/ 2005. 12