Journal of Plant Biotechnology

The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology (한국식물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pollen-Mediated Gene Flow between Glufosinate Ammonium-Tolerant GM and Non-GM Rice

  • Lee, Seung-Yeob (Division of plant resources science, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Soo (Institute of Life Science and Natural Resources, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Hyo-Jin (Institute of Life Science and Natural Resources, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Ahn, Jeong-Ho (Institute of Life Science and Natural Resources, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Baek, So-Hyeon (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Shin, Woon-Chul (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Soon (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA)
  • Published : 2007.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To assess the risk of genetically modified (GM) rice on the agricultural ecosystem, agronomic characteristics, pollen longevity and outcrossing rate between GM (Iksan 483 and Milyang 204) and non-GM (their wild types and female parents) varieties were investigated using the bar gene as a tracer marker in paddy field. The agronomic characteristics of two GM rice were similar to their female-parents (non-GM rice) except heading date and 1,000 grain weight of Iksan 483, and they did not show a difference by the introgression of the bar gene as the genetic traits of rice varieties. Pollen viability was more than 90% just after shedding, and it was rapidly decreased below 50% at 5 minutes after shedding both GM and non-GM varieties. The Pollen longevity was lost after 30 minutes of anthesis. When the distance of gene flow from GM to non-GM rice detected to 6 m from the edge of GM rice plant, the maximum distance of pollen dispersal was 4.5m and 3.9m in Iksan 483 and Milyang 204, respectively, and that was increased in order of west, south, east, and north to the dominant wind direction, west-south. Mean outcrossing rate was very low as 0.003 and 0.001% within 1.5 m from the edge of Iksan 483 and Milyang 204, and the GM hybrids by the pollen dispersal did not detected over 4.5 m from the edge of GM rice plant. The results may help to establish the strategy which reduce the risk of pollen-mediated gene flow between GM and non-GM rice.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson E (1949) Introgressive hybridization. Jhon Wiley and Sons, New York, pp.1-109
  2. Arias DM, Rieseberg LH (1994) Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflower. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 655-660
  3. Chen LJ, Lee DS, Song ZP, Shu HS, Lu BR (2004) Gene flow from cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) to its weedy and wild relatives. Annal. Bot. 93: 67-73 https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch006
  4. Crawford JW, Squire G, Burn D (1999) Modelling spread of herbicide resistance in oilseed rape. In: Amijee F., Gliddon C.J. and Gray A.J. (Eds.) Environmental Impact of Genetically Modified Crops. DETR Research Report, 10: 97-106
  5. Datta SK, Datta K, Soltanifar N, Donn G, Potrykus I (1992) Herbicide-resistant indica rice plants from IRRI breeding Line 72 after PEG-mediated transformation of protoplasts. Plant Mol. Biol. 20: 619-629 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046447
  6. De Candolle A, (1886) Origin of cultivated plants. 2nd. ed. Hafner, New York, pp. 1-385
  7. Fu JH, Lei LG, Chen LB, Qiu GZ (2001) Wall ultrastructure and cytochemistry and the longevity of pollen of three grass species. Austr. J. Bot. 49: 771-776 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT00085
  8. Giddings GD, Sackville Hamilton NR, Hayward MD (1997a) The release of genetically modified grasses. Part I: pollen dispersal to traps in Lolium perenne. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 1000-1006 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050507
  9. Giddings GD, Sackville Hamilton NR, Hayward MD, (1997b) The release of genetically modified grasses. Part II the influence of wind direction on pollen dispersal. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 1007-1014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050508
  10. Hogg PG, Ahlgren HL (1943) Environmental, breeding, and inheritance studies of hydraocyanic acid in Sorghum vulgare var. sudanense. J. Agric. Res. (Washington, DC) 67: 195-210
  11. James C (2005) Global status of commercialized biotech /GM crop. ISAAA Briefs No. 34-2005. http://www. isaaa.org
  12. Khan MN, Heyne EG, Arp AL (1973) Pollen distribution and seed set on Triticum aestivum L. Crop Sci. 13: 223-226 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001200020022x
  13. Kareiva P, Morris W, Jacobi CM (1994) Studying and managing the risk of cross fertilization between transgenic crops and wild relatives. Mol. Ecol. 3: 14-21
  14. Langevin SA, Clay K, Grace JB (1990) The incidence and effects of hybridization between cultivated rice and its related weed red rice (Oryza sativa L.). Evolution 44: 1000-1008 https://doi.org/10.2307/2409561
  15. Lee SY, Kim MS, Kim HJ, Han SS (2006) Evaluation of cross ability, seed dormancy and overwintering ability in glufisinate ammonium-resistant GM rice and their hybrids with non-GM and weedy rice. Kor. J. Crop Sci. 51: 53-58
  16. Lord L (1935) The cultivation of rice in Ceylon. J. Exp. Agr. 3: 119-128
  17. Luna VS, Figueroa MJ, Baltazar MB, Gomez LR, Townsend R, Schoper JB (2001) Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Sci. 41: 1551-1557 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.4151551x
  18. McCartney HA, Lacey ME (1990) Wind dispersal of pollen from crops of oil seed rape (Brassica napus). J. Aeros. Sci. 22: 467-477
  19. Meier-Bethke S, Schiemann J (2003) Effect of varying distances and intervening maize fields on outcrossing rates of transgenic maize. In: the first european conferance on the co-existance of genetically modified crop with conventional and organic crops, Boelt, B. (ed). DIAS, Slagelse, pp. 77-78
  20. Messequer J, Fogher C, Guiderdoni E, Marfa V, Catala MM, Baldi G, Mele E (2001) Field assessment of gene flow from transgenic to cultivated rice (O. sativa L.) using an herbicide resistance gene as tracer marker. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 1151-1159 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220100713
  21. Messequer J, Marfa V, Catala MM, Guiderdoni E, Mele E (2003) A field study of pollen-mediated gene flow from Mediterranean GM rice to conventional rice and the red rice weed. In: the first European conferance on the co-existance of genetically modified crop with conventional and organic crops, Boelt, B. (ed). DIAS, Slagelse, pp. 88-90
  22. Mohan Babu R, Sajeena A, Seetharaman K, Reddy MS (2003) Advances in genetically engineered (transgenic) plants in pest management-an over view. Crop Prot. 22: 1071-1086 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00142-X
  23. Noldin J (1998) Red rice situation and management in the Americas. An international symposium on wild and weedy rices in agro-ecosystem, Asian Pacific Weed Sci. Soc., Ho Chi Minh, pp.36-41
  24. Oard JH, Linscombe SD, Gealy D, Gravois K (2000) Field evalution of seed production, sattering, and dormancy in hybrid populations of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) and the weed, red rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Sci. 157: 13-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00245-4
  25. Oka HI (1988) Origin of cultivated rice. Japan Science Society Press, Tokyo. pp. 1-254
  26. Pantone DJ, Baker JB (1991) Weed-crop competition models and response-surface analysis of red rice competition in cultivated rice: A review. Crop Sci. 31: 1105-1110 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050003x
  27. Song ZP, Lu BR, Zhu YG, Chen JK (2003) Gene flow from cultivated rice to the wild species Oryza rufipogon under experimental field conditions. New Phytol. 157: 657-665 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00699.x
  28. Stephens JC, Quinby JR (1934) Anthesis, pollination, and fertilization in sorghum. J. Agric. Res. 49: 123-136
  29. Suh HS, Back JH, Ha WG (1997) Weedy rice occurrence and position in transplanted and direct-seeded farmer's fields. Kor. J. Crop Sci. 42: 352-356
  30. Thompson CE, Squire G, Mackay GR, Bradshaw JE, Crawford J, Ramsay G (1999) Regional patterns of gene flow and its consequences for GM oilseed rape. In: Gene flow and agriculture, relevance for transgenic crops. Lutman, P.J.W. (ed.). British Crop Protection Council Symposium Proceedings. 72: 95-100
  31. Tu J, Zhang G, Datta K, Xu C, He Y, Zhang Q, Khush GS, Datta SK (2000) Field performance of transgenic elite commercial hybrid rice expressing Bacillus thuringiensis $\delta$-endotoxin. Nat. Biotechnol. 18: 1101-1104 https://doi.org/10.1038/80310
  32. Vasconcelos M, Datta K, Oliva N, Khalekuzzaman M, Torrizo L, Krishnan S, Oliveira M, Goto F, Datta SK (2003) Enhanced iron and zinc accumulation in transgenic rice with the ferritin gene. Plant Sci. 164: 371-378 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00421-1
  33. Wang ZY, Ge Y, Scott M, Spangenberg G (2004) Viability and longevity of pollen from transgenic and nontransgenic tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) (Poaceae) plants. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 523-530 https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.4.523
  34. Westman A, Miller B, Spira T, Tonkyn D, Abbott A (2002) Molecular genetic assesment of the risk of gene escape in strawberry, a model perennial study crop. In: Proceedings of a workshop on ecological and agronomic consequences of gene flow from transgenic crops to wild relatives, Ohio State University, Ohio, pp. 6-24
  35. Ye X, Al-Babili S, Kloti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beyer P, Potrykus I (2000) Engineering the provitamin A ($\beta$-Carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science 287: 303-305 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5451.303
  36. Zhang NY, Linscombe S, Oard J (2003) Outcrossing frequency and genetic analysis of hybrids between transgenic glufosinate herbicide-resistant rice and the weed, red rice. Euphytica 130: 35-45 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022371104679