DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Expert Evaluation Method for the Suitability of Universal Design

유니버설 디자인의 적합성에 관한 전문가 평가 방법

  • 정광태 (한국기술교육대학원 디자인공학과)
  • Published : 2007.11.30

Abstract

In the world, the old population is growing fast and many countries went into an advanced age society. Therefore the development of everyday products, electric appliances, and welfare services considering old people is more important than ever. In particular, the complexity of products can cause many problems for old people. Universal design is an approach to create environments and products that recognizes the diversity of users, regardless of their ability or age. Universality evaluation for a product is very important to verify old people's accessibility and usability for the product. Universality means how good a product was designed in view of universal design principles. In this study, UNIX, a method to evaluate the universality of a product was developed. UNIX was based on seven universal design principles; equitable use, flexibility in use, simple and intuitive, perceptible information, tolerance for error, low physical effort, size and space for approach and use. UNIX is a kind of expert evaluation and very simple method. The method is consisted of two steps. In the first step, relative weights for seven principles and subjective ratings on design suitability for each principle are obtained. In the second step, universality index (UNIX) of each product is obtained by weighted average multiplying relative weights and rating scores. As a case study, this method was applied for mouse designs. In conclusion, this method could be effectively applied to evaluate the universality of a product.

Keywords

References

  1. 김미연, 정의승, 박성준, 휴대전화기 평가 사례를 통한 유니버설 디자인 평가도구 개발 프로세스, 대한인간공학회지, vol. 25, No. 4, 51-62, 2006
  2. 송복희, 윤한경, 정광태, The Universal Design of Microwave Oven considering Old Persons, 대한인간공학회지, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2000
  3. 정광태, 가전제품의 유니버설 디자인, 대한인간공학회 2004 추계 학술대회, 2004
  4. Arthur D. Fisk, Human Factors and the older adult, Ergonomics in design, January, 8-13, 1999
  5. Embrey, D. E., Humphreys, P. C., Rosa, E. A., Kirwan, B., & Rea, K., SLIM-MAUD, An approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgement, Vols. I & II, Washington, DC: NUREG/CR-3518, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1984
  6. Nishimaki Hitoshi, Kiuchi Nozomu, Kozuka Kiyoshi, Yamaguchi Yukikazu, Study of universal design evaluation indices, Research Center for Land and Construction, 2007
  7. OGI Hajime, YOKOI Takashi, UJIKE Hiroyasu, KURAKATA Kenji, Study on a Universal Design Methodology for Products in a Rapidly Aging Society, 일본디자인학회지, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1999
  8. Ronald L. Mace, Universal Design: Housing for the Lifespan for All People, (http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/index.html), 1999
  9. SAKAI Masayuki, Universal Design for Electric Home Appliances, 일본 디자인학회지, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1999
  10. Saaty, T., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Mathematical Psychology, 15: 234-281, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  11. The Center for Universal Design, Evaluating the universal design performance of products, N.C. State University, 2000
  12. Wendy A., Rogers, Handbook of Human Factors and the Older Adult, Academic Press, 1997