DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한우수소의 부위별 영양성분조성 및 이화학적 육질특성

Nutritional Composition and Physico-chemical Meat Quality Properties of Korean Hanwoo Bull Beef

  • Cho, S.H. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, B.Y. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, J.H. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Y.H. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Seong, P.N. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Chung, W.T. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Chung, M.O. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, D.H. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Ahn, C.N. (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • 발행 : 2007.12.31

초록

본 연구는 일반적으로 낮은 육질등급으로 유통되는 한우수소고기에 대하여 소비자 관능평가를 실시하여 사회인구학적 요인과 한국소비자들의 관능특성간에 어떠한 관계가 있는지 알아보고, 이 결과를 한국소비자들을 위한 요리방법별 부위별 맛 예측 모델을 설정하기 위한 기초자료로 활용하고자 수행하였다. 24개월령 한우수소를 도축한 후 업진, 보섭, 채끝, 등심, 꾸리, 홍두깨, 목심, 설깃, 우둔, 양지부위를 분리하여 전국 소비자 650명을 대상으로 탕, 그릴 및 구이형태로 각각 조리하여 연도, 다즙성, 향미 및 전반적인 기호도를 평가한 결과 탕형태로 조리된 한우수소고기는 거주지역, 연령, 성별, 직업, 고기섭취습관 및 10개의 부위에 대한 관능특성 4가지 요인(연도, 다즙성, 향미 및 전반적인 기호도)과 모두 관련이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 스테이크 형태인 경우 쇠고기에 대한 기호성향이 거주지역, 연령 및 식습관 등과 유의적인 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났으나 직업, 가족수, 가계수입 및 부위에 따라서는 유의적인 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다(p<0.01). 구이형태인 경우 거주지역, 연령, 직업, 가계수입, 식습관 및 부위에 따라 기호도 성향에 차이가 있었다. 또한, 한우수소고기의 관능평가 결과에 대하여 주성분 분석을 실시한 결과 요리방법에 따라 연도, 다즙성, 향미 및 기호도가 부위별 관능특성에 미치는 가중치가 다른 것으로 분석되었다. 결론적으로 한국소비자들은 동일한 조건의 쇠고기일지라도 요리방법 및 부위에 따라 쇠고기 맛을 평가하는 기호도에 차이가 있었으며 이러한 점을 고려하여 부위별요리방법별 맛 예측모델을 확립한다면 한우고기를 차별화할 수 있는 유통시스템 개발이 가능할 것으로 생각된다.

This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between the socio-demographic factors and the Korean consumers’ palatability evaluation and to collect the sensory information for development of prediction palatability model of Hanwoo beef. Ten cuts〔Abjin (short plate), Bosup (top sirloin), Cheggt (striploin), Dngsim (loin), Guri (chuck tender), Hongduke (eye of round), Moksim (chuck roll), Sulgit (bottom round), Udoon (top round), Yangi (brisket)〕 were separated from 10 Hanwoo bulls beef(~24 months old) and prepared with the same manner for 3 different cooking methods such as boiling, grilling and roasting. The cooked beef samples were served to 650 consumers recruited from Seoul, Joongbu, Honam and Youngnam locations and evaluated tenderness, juiciness, flavor and overall acceptability. The living location, age, gender, occupation, eating habit and cut were significantly related with the sensory properties when bull beef were cooked as boiled cooking(p<0.05). In grill cooking, only occupation, income and cut had the significant effect on the overall acceptability of Hanwoo bull beef(p<0.01). When bull beef were cooked as Korean traditional roast cooking, consumer’s sensory properties were significantly different by the living location, age, occupation, income, eating habit of consumers and cut(p<0.05). Also, results from the principal component analysis showed that palatability scores of Korean consumers were decided with different contribution scores of tenderness, juiciness, flavor and overall acceptability of cut depending on cooking methods. In conclusion, Korean consumers’ palatability for Hanwoo bull beef were related with the socio-demographic factors and the sensory results were different by cut and cooking methods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ansorena, D., Pena, M. P. D., Astiasaran, I. and Bello, J. 1997. Colour evaluation of chorize de pamplona, a Spanish dry fermented sausage : comparison between the CIE L*a*b* and the hunter Lab systems with illuminants D65 and C. Meat Sci. 46:313-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00025-9
  2. Animal Products Grading Service. 2007. Grade information, http://www.apgs.co.kr/gradeinfo/statistics (assessed on August 30, 2007)
  3. AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC
  4. Arthaud, V. H., Mandigo, R. W., Korh R. M. and Kotula, A. W. 1977. Carcass composition, quality, and palatability attributes of bulls and steers fed different energy levels and killed at four ages. J. Anim. Sci. 44:53-64 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.44153x
  5. Berry, B. W., Smith, G. C. and Carpenter, Z. L. 1972. Influence of certain physiological maturity indicators on beef tenderness. Beef Cattle Res. in texas PR-3131. p 27
  6. Berry, B. W. 1993. Tenderness of beef loin steaks as influences by marbling level, removal of subcutaneous fat and cooking method. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2412-2419
  7. Bodwell, C. E. 1986. Nutritional composition and value of meat products. Muscle as Food, 321-328
  8. Bowers, J. A., Craig, J. A., Kropf, D. H. and Tucker, T. J. 1987. Flavor, color and other characteristics of beef longissimus muscle heated to seven internal temperatures between 551 and $85^{\circ}C$. J. Food Sci., 52: 533-536 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb06668.x
  9. Breidenstein, B. B., Cooper, C. C. Evans, R. G. and Bray, R. W. 1968. Influence of marbling and maturity on palatability of beef muscle. 1. Chemical and organoleptic consideration. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1532-1536 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2761532x
  10. Cho, S. H., Lee, J. M., Kim, J. H., Park, B. Y., Yoo, Y. M. and Kim, Y. K 1999. Survey of consumer perception and demand on beef market. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 19(4):352-360
  11. Field, R. A., Nelms, G. E. and Schoonover, C. D. 1966. Effects of age, marbling and sex on palatability of beef. J. Anim. Sci. 25:360
  12. Field, R. A. 1971. Effect of castration on meat quality and quantity. J. Anim. Sci. 32:849-858 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1971.325849x
  13. Godber, J. S. 1994. Nutritional value of muscle foods. Muscle Food, 430
  14. Harrington, G. 1994. Consumer demands: major problem facing industry in a consumer-driven society. Meat Sci. 36:5-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)90029-9
  15. Ibanez, C., Quintanilla, L., Irigoyen, A., Garcia-Jalon, I., Cid, C, Astiasaran, I. and Bello, J. 1995. Partial replacement of sodium choloride with potassium chloride in dry fermented sausage : Influence on carbohydrate fermentation and the nitrosation process. Meat Sci. 40:45-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)00026-4
  16. Kim, M. S., Yang, J. B. and Moon, Y. H. 1999. Effects of chilling process after thawing on the free amino acid composition of beef loin. Kor. J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 19(3):234-239
  17. Kim, J. H., Park, B. Y., Yoo, Y. M., Cho, S. H., Kim, Y. K, Lee, J. M., Yun, H. J. and Kim, K. N. 2002. Characteristics of carcass meat yields of fattening pigs by production step. Kor. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. 44, 793-800 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2002.44.6.793
  18. Kristensen, L. and Purslow, P. P. 2001. The effect of ageing on the water-holding capacity of pork: role of cytoskeletal proteins. Meat Sci. 58, 241-247
  19. Jacobs, J. A., Miller, J. C, Sauters, E. A. Howes, A. D., Araji, A. A., Gregory, T. L. and Hust, C. E. 1977. Bulls versus steers. II. Palatability and retail acceptance. J. Anim. Sci. 45:699-702 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.454699x
  20. Jeremiah, L. E. 1978. A review of factors affecting meat quality. Tech. Bull. 1, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada
  21. Landon, M. E., Hedrick, H. B. and Thompson, G. B. 1978. Live animal performance and carcass characteristics of beef bullocks and steer. J. Anim. Sci. 47:151-155 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.471151x
  22. Lizaso, G., Hernadez, B., Chasco, J., Insausti, K., Beriain, M. J. and Purroy, A. 1996. Meat colour from pirencia steers and heifers after vacuum packaging. Proceedings of the 42nd ICoMST., 1:98-99
  23. Mercier, Y., Gatellier, P., Viau, M., Remignon, H. and Renerre, M. 1998. Effect of Dietary fat and vitamin E on colour stability and on lipid and protein oxidation in turkey meat during storage. Meat Sci., 48 301-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00113-7
  24. Ministry of Agriculture and forest (MAF). 2007. Information and data of agricultural statistics of Korea http://www.english.maf.go.kr/index.jsp (assessed on July 30, 2007)
  25. Reagan, J. O., Carpenter, Z. L., Smith, G. C. and King, G. T. 1971. Comparison of palatability traits of beef produced by young bulls and steers. J. Anim. Sci. 32:641-646 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1971.324641x
  26. Sakata, R. and Nagata, Y. 1992. Heme pigment content in meat as affected by the addition curing agents. Meat Sci. 32:343-350 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(92)90097-N
  27. Santamaria, I., Lizarraga, T., Astiasaran, I. and Bello, J. 1992. Contribucion alproblema del desarrollo del color en al Chorizo de Pamplona : comportamiento de nitritos, nitratosy pigmentos carnicos. Alimentaria, 1:23-26
  28. Sanz, M. C, Verde, M. T., Saez, T. and Sanudo, C. 1996. Effect of breed on the muscle glycogen content on dark cutting incidence in stressed young bulls, Meat Sci. 43:37-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)00053-4
  29. SAS. 1996. SAS STAT User's Guide, Statistics, Cary NC
  30. Seideman, S. C, Cross, H. R., Oltjen, R. R. and Schanbacher, B. D. 1982. Utilization of the intact male for red meat production : Review. J. Anim. Sci. 55(4):826-840 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.554826x
  31. Smith, D. R., Nuir, P. D. and Smith, N. B. 1997. Between and within Mob Variation in meat and fat colour of pasture finished steers. Proceedings of the 43rd ICoMST., 1:338-339
  32. Yang, A., Larsen, T. W., Powell, V. H. and Tume, R. K. 1999. A comparison of fat composition of Japanese and long-term grain-fed Australian steers. Meat Sci. 51:1-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00065-5
  33. Watson, M. J. 1969. the effects of castration on the growth and meat quality of grazing cattle. Australian J. Exp. Agr. Husb. 9:164-167 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9690164
  34. Weninger, J. H. and Steinhauf, D. 1968. Meat quality in respect to carcass evaluation in cattle. World Rev. of Anim. Prod. 4:87
  35. Watanabe, A., Daly, C. C. and Devine, C. E. 1996. The effects of the ultimate pH of meat on tenderness charges during ageing. Meat. Sci. Vol. 42:67-78 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)00012-7
  36. Wheeler, T. L., Shackelford, S. D. and Koo-hmaraie, M. 2000. Relationship of beef long-issimus tenderness classes to tenderness of gluteus medius, semimembrano and biceps femoris. J. Anim. Sci., 78, 2856-2861
  37. 강종옥, 최도영, 오홍록, 김기환. 1999. 등급별 국내산 한우육과 국별 수입우육의 물리화학적 특성비교-육색, 지방색, 성숙도에 관한 고찰. 한국동물자원학회지 41(5):555-562
  38. 김대곤, 정근기, 성삼경, 최창본, 김성겸, 김덕영, 최봉재. 1996. 거세가 한우 및 홀스타인 비육우 도체의 이화학적 특성에 미치는 영향. 한국축산학회지. 38:239-248
  39. 김병철, 오세종. 1990. 한우육과 홀스타인육의 이화학적 성질에 관한 비교연구. 고려대학교 농림논집. 107
  40. 김선구, 이길왕, 이종문, 정숙근. 1982. 육 및 육제품제조와 품질에 관한 연구. 축시보고서. 668
  41. 농림기술개발사업최종보고서, 2001. 육류의 저장 및 유통개선을 위한 기술개발, 농림부
  42. 소 및 돼지고기 부분육 분할 정형 지침서, 1997. 축산과학원
  43. 백봉현, 이병석, 강희설, 김용곤, 박명국, 이근상. 1992. 한우의 거세시기가 육질 및 육생산에 미치는 영향. 농시연보. p.62
  44. 이길왕, 김용곤, 정숙근, 차장옥, 백영기, 송계원. 1981. 쇠고기의 분할방법 및 해부학적 특성과 이용법 규명에 관한연구. 축시연보. 580
  45. 채영석, 강창기, 김동학. 1983. 한우 사육형태가 육질에 미치는 영향. 2. 이화학적 특성. 한국축산학회지. 25:629
  46. 二律本 充, 山下 良弘, 二橋忠由, 中西直人. 1987. 黑手和種去勢牛における胸長筋の理化學的 特性と格付等級との 關係. 中國試報. B, 29: 35
  47. 吉田正三郞, 上田敬介, 寺田降慶, 田中影治, 小尺忍, 1968. 若齡肥肉における雄牛と去勢牛の 産肉性の 比較, 中國農試報, 16: 873

피인용 문헌

  1. Quality Grade Hanwoo Beef Using Different Cooking Methods vol.30, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.6.1024
  2. Effect of Feeding Mugwort (Artemisia capillaris) TMR Fodder on Nutritional Composition of Hanwoo Beef vol.21, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2011.21.4.568
  3. Comparison of Fatty Acid and Nutritional Composition of Korean Native Black Cattle and Hanwoo vol.30, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2014.30.5.556