Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지

A Basic Study for Landscape Ecological Design and Planning by Public Participation in the Sheffield Green Belt

주민참여를 통한 쉐필드 그린벨트의 경관생태학적 설계 및 계획을 위한 기초 연구

  • Kim, Keun-Ho (Biohousing Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Tong-Buhm (Department of Landscape Architecture, Chonnam National University)
  • 김근호 (전남대학교 바이오하우징연구사업단) ;
  • 조동범 (전남대학교 조경학과)
  • Published : 2007.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

경관특성평가(Landscape character assessment)는 지속가능한 경관생태학적 설계 및 계획을 찾는데 있어 점점 중요한 역할을 담당하고 있다. 이 연구는 농촌경관(Rural landscape)평가방법의 잠재성에 초점을 두고 전문가에 의한 쉐필드 그린벨트의 경관가치 평가가 그린벨트 안이나 주변에 사는 거주자들의 의견을 반영했는지를 연구하였다. 쉐필드 그린벨트지역을 대상으로 경관특성평가를 하였고 설문지 조사 결과는 경관에 전문지식을 갖고 있는 전문가에 의한 평가와 일반인에 의한 평가결과를 서로 비교하는데 이용하였다. 결과를 통해 두 그룹사이의 유사점들과 차이점들을 판단할 수 있었고 경관생태학적 설계 및 계획을 위한 경관특성평가 과정에서 일반인의 참여의 가능성을 제시할 수 있었다. 앞으로 지속가능한 경관생태학적 설계 및 계획의 중요한 수단으로서 진보된 경관특성평가의 접근방법이 개발되어져야 할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bishop, K. and A. Phillips, 2004, Countryside Planning - New Approaches to Management and Conservation, Earthscan, London
  2. City of Hong Kong, 2001, Landscape Value Mapping of Hong Kong: Inception Report, Government Information Services, Hong Kong
  3. Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, 2002, Landscape Character Assessment : Guidance for England and Scotland, Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, Wetherby
  4. Environment and Heritage Service, 2001, Northern Ireland Landscape Character Assessment 2000, Corporate Document Services, Leeds
  5. Janse, G. and C. Konijnendijk, 2007, Communication between science, policy and citizens in public participation in urban forestry-Experience from the Neighbourwoods project, Uban Forestry & Urban Greening 6 : 23-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.09.005
  6. Joyce, L, 2003, Improving the flow of scientific information across the interface of forest science and policy, Policy and Economics 5: 339-347 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00033-9
  7. Martin, J, 2004, Applications of Landscape Character Assessment, In. Bishop, K. and A. Phillips, (Eds.) Countryside Planning, Earthscan, London, pp. 203-221
  8. McCormack, A. and T. O'Leary, 2004, Development and Application of Landscape Assessment Guidelines in Ireland: Case Studies using Forestry and Wind Farm Developments, In. Bishop, K. and A. Phillips, (Eds.) Countryside Planning, Earthscan, London, pp. 141-154
  9. Scottish Natural Heritage and Fife Council, 1999, Fife Landscape Character Assessment, Scottish Natural Heritage Publications Section, Perth
  10. Smith, W. and S. Kelly, 2003, Science, technical expertise and the human environment, Process in Planning 60 : 321-394 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(02)00119-8
  11. Starrett, M, 2004, Policies and Priorities for Ireland's Landscapes, In: Bishop, K. and A. Phillips, (Eds.) Countryside Planning, Earthscan, London, pp. 125-140
  12. Swanwick, C, 2004, The Assessment of Countryside and Landscape Character in England : An Overview, In: Bishop, K. and A. Phillips, (Eds.) Countryside Planning, Earthscan, London, pp. 102-124
  13. Tippett, J, 2005, The value of combining a systems view of sustainability with a participatory protocol for ecologically informed design in river basins, Environmental Modelling & Software 20 : 119-139 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.12.016
  14. White, G.F, 2000, Water science and technology: some lessons from the 20th century, Environment 42 : 30-39