Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain

Korean Academy of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine (대한안면통증구강내과학회)
권호 표지

Prognosis of Recurred TMD Patients According to Conservative Therapy

측두하악장애 재발환자의 보존적 처치에 따른 예후

  • Ko, Myung-Yun (Department of Oral medicine, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Ik-Hwan (Department of Oral medicine, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ok, Seung-Joon (Department of Oral medicine, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ahn, Yong-Woo (Department of Oral medicine, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 고명연 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김익환 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 옥승준 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 안용우 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실)
  • Published : 2007.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We examined 104 patients(primary group, controlled group) who had visited PNUH from 1994 to 2002, having been diagnosed as temporomandibular disorders(TMDs) and treated in conservative ways such as Behavior modification, medications, physical therapies and splint therapies. We also examined 54 patients(recurred group, experimental group) who had visited PNUH from 1991 to 2001, having been diagnosed as TMDs and experienced recurrence after conservatively treated. To find out the symptoms of Recurred TMD patients and their results of conservative treatments, we compared these two groups mentioned above. The obtained results were as follows: 1. Both primary and recurred groups have showed great improvements with conservative treatments. 2. Both primary and recurred groups have showed no differences in pain, LOM, MCO in their first visits but the noise were louder in primary group. 3. Both primary and recurred groups have showed no differences in pain, LOM, MCO when the treatments were over but the noise were louder in recurred group. 4. Treatments modalities, diagnosis, sex, kind of disease had not affected the results of treatment in either of groups. 5. It has come out that much better results were achieved when the patients in primary group had treated for over 6 months and for more than 10 times.

측두하악장애 재발 환자의 증상과 보존적 치료결과에 대하여 알아보고자 1994년부터 2002년까지 부산대학병원 구강내과에 내원하여 측두하악장애로 진단되어 약물요법, 물리치료, 교합안정장치 등 보존적 치료를 받은 환자 104명(원발군, 대조군)과 1991년부터 2001년까지 부산대학병원 구강내과에 내원하여 측두하악장애로 진단되어 보존적 치료를 받은 후에 증상이 재발하여 1992년부터 2002년에 걸쳐 보존적인 방법으로 재치료를 받은 환자 54명(재발군, 실험군)을 대상으로 서로 비교하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 원발군과 재발군은 모두 보존적 처치로 증상이 현저히 개선되었다. 2. 원발군과 재발군의 초진시 증상은 통증, 개구제한, 최대 편이개구량은 차이가 없었으나 관절잡음은 원발군에서 높았다. 3. 원발군과 재발군의 치료 종결시 증상은 통증, 개구제한, 최대 편이개구량은 차이가 없었으나 관절잡음은 재발군에서 높았다. 4. 원발군과 재발군 모두 치료방법, 성, 병명에 따른 치료결과의 차이는 없었다. 5. 원발군은 치료기간이 6개월 이상 일수록, 치료횟수가 10회 이상일수록 치료결과가 양호하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Okeson JP. Bell's orofacial pains, the clinical management of orofacial pain. 5th ed. Illinois, 2005, Quintessence Publ Co., pp. 329-330
  2. Mcneil C. Craniomandibular disorders guidelines for evaluation, diagnosis and management, Chicago, 1990, Quintessence Publ Co., pp. 76-79
  3. 기우천, 최재갑, 고명연 역. 측두하악장애 분류, 평가 및 치료를 위한 지침서. 서울, 1993, 지성출판사, pp. 22-23, 86-87
  4. RJM Gray. A clinical guide to temporomandibular disorders. BDJ, 1995, pp. 2-3
  5. 정성창 역. 악관절 장애와 교합의 치료. 제5판, 서울, 2003, 대한나래출판사, pp. 151,178, 68-370
  6. 정성창, 김영구. 구강안면 동통과 측두하악장애. 서울, 2006, 신흥인터내셔날, pp. 7-10
  7. 박준상, 고명연. 두개하악장애 환자의 보존적 치료에 관한 장기평가. 대한구강내과학회지, 1993;18:81-96
  8. Greene CS, Laskin DM. Long-term evaluation of conservative treatment for myofascial pain dysfuntion syndrome. JADA 1974;89:1365-1368
  9. Carraro JJ, Caffesse RG. Effect of occlusal splint on TMJ symptomatology. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40: 553-566
  10. Ohbach R, Dworkin SF. Five-year outcomes in TMD: Five-year outcomes in pain to changes in physical and psychological variables. Pain 1998;74:315-326 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00194-2
  11. 정성창 역. 악관절 장애와 교합의 치료. 제5판, 서울, 2003, 대한나래출판사, pp. 160-161
  12. 기우천, 최재갑, 윤창륙, 고명연, 정성창. 구강안면통증. 서울, 1996, 지성출판사, pp. 119-198
  13. Marcian RD, Ziegler RC. Temporomandivular joint surgery. A review of fifty-one operations. Oral Surg 1983;56:472-479 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(83)90090-7
  14. Oakley ME, McCreary CP, Clark GT et al. A cognitive -behavioral approach to temporomandibural dysfunction treatment failures. A controlled comparison. J Orofac Pain 1994;8:397-401
  15. Whitney CW, Von Korff M. Regression to the meaning treated versus untreated chronic pain, Pain 1992;50:281-285 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90032-7
  16. Sheridan P, Hall B. NIH panel makes recommendations for temporomandibular disorders. NIDR Research Digest 1996;6:2-3
  17. 안용우, 박준상, 고명연. 측두하악장애 재발환자의 임상 소견과 치료에 관한 연구. 대한구강내과학회지 2004;29: 167-175
  18. Greene CS, Laskin DM. TMDs An evidence-based approach and diagnosis and treatment. 3th ed., 2006, Quintessence Publ Co. Inc., pp. 413-419