A Discrete Mathematical Model Applied to Genetic Regulation and Metabolic Networks

  • Asenjo, J.A. (Centre for Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology) ;
  • Ramirez, P. (Centre for Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology) ;
  • Rapaport, I. (Centre for Mathematical Modelling, Institute for Cell Dynamics and Biotechnology, University of Chile) ;
  • Aracena, J. (Department of Mathematical Engineering, University of Concepcion) ;
  • Goles, E. (Centre for Mathematical Modelling, Institute for Cell Dynamics and Biotechnology, University of Chile) ;
  • Andrews, B.A. (Centre for Mathematical Modelling, Institute for Cell Dynamics and Biotechnology, University of Chile)
  • Published : 2007.03.31

Abstract

This paper describes the use of a discrete mathematical model to represent the basic mechanisms of regulation of the bacteria E. coli in batch fermentation. The specific phenomena studied were the changes in metabolism and genetic regulation when the bacteria use three different carbon substrates (glucose, glycerol, and acetate). The model correctly predicts the behavior of E. coli vis-a-vis substrate mixtures. In a mixture of glucose, glycerol, and acetate, it prefers glucose, then glycerol, and finally acetate. The model included 67 nodes; 28 were genes, 20 enzymes, and 19 regulators/biochemical compounds. The model represents both the genetic regulation and metabolic networks in an integrated form, which is how they function biologically. This is one of the first attempts to include both of these networks in one model. Previously, discrete mathematical models were used only to describe genetic regulation networks. The study of the network dynamics generated 8 $(2^3)$ fixed points, one for each nutrient configuration (substrate mixture) in the medium. The fixed points of the discrete model reflect the phenotypes described. Gene expression and the patterns of the metabolic fluxes generated are described accurately. The activation of the gene regulation network depends basically on the presence of glucose and glycerol. The model predicts the behavior when mixed carbon sources are utilized as well as when there is no carbon source present. Fictitious jokers (Joker1, Joker2, and Repressor SdhC) had to be created to control 12 genes whose regulation mechanism is unknown, since glycerol and glucose do not act directly on the genes. The approach presented in this paper is particularly useful to investigate potential unknown gene regulation mechanisms; such a novel approach can also be used to describe other gene regulation situations such as the comparison between non-recombinant and recombinant yeast strain, producing recombinant proteins, presently under investigation in our group.

Keywords

References

  1. Aracena, J., M. Gonzalez, A. Zuniga, M. Mendez, and V. Cambiazo. 2006. Regulatory network for cell shape changes during Drosophila ventral furrow formation. J. Theor. Biol. 239: 49-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.07.011
  2. Aracena, J. 2001. Discrete Mathematical Models Associated to Biological Systems. Application to genetic regulation networks, Doctoral Thesis in Engineering Sciences, mention Mathematical Modelling, University of Chile
  3. Bledig, S. A., T. M. Ramseier, and M. H. Saier Jr. 1996. Frur mediates catabolite activation of pyruvate kinase (pykF) gene expression in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 178: 280-283 https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.1.280-283.1996
  4. Charpentier, B., V. Bardey, N. Robas, and C. Branlant. 1998. The EIIGlc protein is involved in glucose-mediated activation of Escherichia coli gapA and gapB-pgk transcription. J. Bacteriol. 180: 6476-6483
  5. Cozzone, A. J. 1998. Regulation of acetate metabolism by protein phosphorylation in enteric bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 52: 127-164 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.52.1.127
  6. Covert, M. W. and B. O. Palsson. 2002. Transcriptional regulation in constraints-based models of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 28058-28064 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M201691200
  7. Cunningham, L., M. J. Gruer, and J. R. Guest. 1997. Transcriptional regulation of the aconitase genes (acnA and acnB) of Escherichia coli. Microbiology 143: 3795-3805 https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-143-12-3795
  8. Eppler, T., P. Postma, A. Schutz, U. Volker, and W. Boos. 2002. Glycerol-3-phosphate-induced catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 184: 3044-3052 https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.11.3044-3052.2002
  9. Gonzalez, R., B. A. Andrews, J. Monitor, and J. A. Asenjo. 2003. Metabolic analysis of the synthesis of high levels of intracellular human SOD in S. cerevisiae rhSOD 2060 411 SGA122. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82: 152-169 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10556
  10. Holms, H. 1996. Flux analysis and control of the central metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 19: 85-116 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00255.x
  11. Hurley, J. H., H. R. Faber, D. Worthylake, N. D. Meadow, S. Roseman, D. W. Pettigrew, and S. J. Remington. 1993. Structure of the regulatory complex of Escherichia coli IIIGlc with glycerol kinase. Science 259: 673-677 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8430315
  12. Nam, T. W., S. H. Cho, D. Shin, J. H. Kim, J. Y. Jeong, J. H. Lee, J. H. Roe, A. Peterkofsky, S. O. Kang, S. Ryu, and Y. J. Seok. 2001. The Escherichia coli glucose transporter enzyme IICB(Glc) recruits the global repressor Mlc. EMBO J. 20: 491-498 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.3.491
  13. Jin, J. H., U. S. Jung, J. W. Nam, Y. H. In, S. Y. Lee, D. Lee, and J. Lee. 2005. Construction of comprehensive metabolic network for glycolysis with regulation mechanism and effectors. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15: 161-174
  14. Negre, D., C. Bonod-Bidaud, C. Geourjon, G. Deleage, A. J. Cozzone, and J. C. Cortay. 1996. Definition of a consensus DNA-binding site for the Escherichia coli pleiotropic regulatory protein, FruR. Molec. Microbiol. 21: 257-266 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.6341350.x
  15. Nelson, D., A. Lehninger, and M. Cox. 2000. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. Worth Publishers
  16. Oh, M. and J. C. Liao. 2000. Gene expression profiling by DNA microarrays and metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Prog. 16: 278-286 https://doi.org/10.1021/bp000002n
  17. Park, S. J., P. A. Cotter, R. P. Gunsalus. 1995. Regulation of malate dehydrogenase (mdh) gene expression in Escherichia coli in response to oxygen, carbon, and heme availability. J. Bacteriol. 177: 6652-6656 https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.22.6652-6656.1995
  18. Park, S. J. and R. P. Gunsalus. 1995. Oxygen, iron, carbon, and superoxide control of the fumarase fumA and fumC genes of Escherichia coli: Role of the arcA, fnr, and soxR gene products. J. Bacteriol. 177: 6255-6262 https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.21.6255-6262.1995
  19. Saier, M. H. Jr. and T. M. Ramseier. 1996. The catabolite repressor/activator (Cra) protein of enteric bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 178: 3411-3417 https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.12.3411-3417.1996
  20. Takeda, S., A. Matsushika, and T. Mizuno. 1999. Repression of the gene encoding succinate dehydrogenase in response to glucose is mediated by the EIICB(Glc) protein in Escherichia coli. J. Biochem. 126: 354-360 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022457
  21. Tanaka, Y., K. Kimata, and H. Aiba. 2000. A novel regulatory role of glucose transporter of Escherichia coli: Membrane sequestration of a global repressor Mlc. EMBO J. 19: 5344-5352 https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.20.5344