Genetic Toxicity Test of o-Nitrotoluene by Ames, Micronucleus, Comet Assays and Microarray Analysis

  • Lee, Eun-Mi (Department of Toxicological Researches, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration) ;
  • Lee, So-Youn (Department of Toxicological Researches, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Sun (Department of Toxicological Researches, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration) ;
  • Kang, Jin-Seok (Department of Toxicological Researches, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration) ;
  • Han, Eui-Sik (Department of Toxicological Researches, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration) ;
  • Go, Seo-Youn (College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Sheen, Yhun-Yong (College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Hee (Department of Toxicological Researches, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration) ;
  • Park, Sue-Nie (Department of Toxicological Researches, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration)
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

o-Nitrotoluene is used to synthesize artificial dyes and raw materials of urethane resin. In this study, we have carried out in vitro genetic toxicity tests and microarray analysis to understand the underlying mechanisms and the mode of action of toxicity of onitrotoluene. TA1535 and TA98 cells were treated with o-nitrotoluene to test its toxicity by basic genetic toxicity test. Ames and two new in vitro micronucleus and COMET assays were applied using CHO cells and L5178Y cells, respectively. In addition, microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes in L5178Y cells in response to o-nitrotoluene was analyzed using Affymatrix genechip. The result of Ames test was that o-nitrotoluene treatment did not increase the mutations both in base substitution strain TA1535 and in frame shift TA98. o-Nitrotoluene has not increased micronuclei in CHO cells. But onitrotoluene increased DNA damage in L5178Y cell. Two-hundred two genes were initially selected as differentially expressed genes in response to o-nitrotoluene by microarray analysis and forty four genes among them were over 2 times of log fold changed. These forty four genes could be candidate biomarkers of genetic toxic action of o-nitrotoluene related to induction of mutation and/or induction of micronuclei and DNA damage. Further confirmation of these candidate markers related to the DNA damage will be useful to understand the detailed mechanism of action of o-nitrotoluene.

Keywords

References

  1. Affymetrix, Inc. 'GeneChip$\CircledR$ expression analysis technical manual' http://www.affymetrix.com/support /technical/manual/expression_manual.affx (2002)
  2. Anderson, D., Yu, T. W. & McGregor, D. B. Comet assay responses as indicators of carcinogenic exposure. Mutagen. 13:539-555 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/13.6.539
  3. Elia, M. C., Storer, R. D. & McKelvey, T. W. Rapid DNA degradation in primary rat hepatocytes treated with diverse cytotoxic chemicals: analysis by pulsed field gel electrophoresis and implications for alkaline elution assays. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 24:181-191 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2850240307
  4. Fenech, M. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat. Res. 455:81-95 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00065-8
  5. Galloway, S. M. et al. Chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells: Evaluations of 108 chemicals. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 10(Suppl. 10):1-175 (1987)
  6. Gatehouse, D. et al. Recommendations for the performance of bacterial mutation assays. Mutat. Res. 312: 217-233 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(94)90037-X
  7. Haworth, S. et al. Salmonella mutagenicity test results for 250 chemicals. Environmental Mutagenesis 5:3-142 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2860050703
  8. Kasamatsu, T. et al. Genotoxicity studies on dietary diacylglycerol (DAG) oil. Food Chem. Toxicol. 43(2): 253-260 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.10.001
  9. Kettunen, E. et al. LICAM, INP10, P-cadherin, tPA and ITGB4 over expression in malignant pleural mesotheliomas revealed by combined use of cDNA and tissue microarray. Carcinogenesis 26:7-25 (2005)
  10. Kirsch-Volders, M. et al. Report from the in vitro micronucleus assay working group. Mutat. Res. 540: 153-163 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.07.005
  11. Kim, Y. et al. Major carcinogenic pathways identified by gene expression analysis of peritoneal mesotheliomas following chemical treatment in F344 rats. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 214:144-151 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2005.12.009
  12. NTP Technical Report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis study of o-nitrotoluene in F344/N rats and B6C3F mice. Natl. Toxicol. Program Tech. Rep. Ser. 504:1-357 (2002)
  13. Tice, R. R. et al. Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 35: 206-221 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::AID-EM8>3.0.CO;2-J
  14. Sills, R. C. et al. o-Nitrotoluene-induced large intestinal tumors in B6C3F1 mice model human colon cancer in their molecular pathogenesis. Carcinogenesis 25:605-612 (2004)
  15. Singh, N. P., McCoy, M. T., Tice, R. R. & Schneider E. L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res. 175:184-191 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0
  16. Singhal, S. et al. Gene expression profiling of malignant mesothelioma. Clinical Cancer Research 9:3080 -3097 (2003)
  17. Williams, J. R., Little, J. B. & Shipley, W. U. Association of mammalian cell death with a specific endonucleolytic degradation of DNA. Nature 252:754-755 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1038/252754a0