Plant Regeneration from Leaf derived Callus of Hybrid Kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa × A. arguta)

잡종키위 (양다래×다래)의 엽조직 캘러스로부터 식물체 재분화

  • Kim, Yong-Wook (Div. of Biotechnology, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Moon, Heung-Kyu (Div. of Biotechnology, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 김용욱 (국립산림과학원 생물공학과) ;
  • 문흥규 (국립산림과학원 생물공학과)
  • Received : 2006.10.12
  • Accepted : 2007.03.07
  • Published : 2007.03.31

Abstract

Whole plants were regenerated from callus induced from leaf explants in hybrid kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa${\times}$A. arguta). Callus was induced from leaf explants which cultured on MS solid medium supplemented with combination of auxin (2,4-D, NAA: 0.1~0.5 mg/l) and cytokinin (BA: 0.1~0.2 mg/l). them, the highest callus formation (96.2%) was obtained from the treatment of 0.5 mg/1 2,4-D+0.1 mg/l NAA+0.05 mg/l BA. In the experiment of adventitious shoots induction from primary shoots, only a few shoots were produced in the treatment of 1.0 mg/l BA+0.05 mg/l IBA or 2.0 mg/l BA+0.05 mg/l lBA. As the callus were transferred to the secondary shoot-inducing medium, multiple shoots were obtained from the medium supplemented with 1.0, 2.0 or 5.0 mg/l zeatin in addition to the mixed treatments of BA, thidiazuron (TDZ) or zeatin. However, no multiple shoots were induced on the BA-contained medium of concentrations. Therefore it turned out that addition of BA to medium was less effective for induction of multiple shoots from callus in Actinidia deliciosa${\times}$A. arguta. For producing adventitious roots from shoots, the best frequency of rooting (83.3%) were recorded on the treatment of in vitro rooting (Standardi (St)+1.0 mg/l IBA). On the other side, the lowest result (40.0%) were shown in the treatment of 500 mg/l IBA, 1 hr. Whole plants with shoots and roots were recovered and acclimatized successfully.

잡종키위(Actinidia deliciosa${\times}$A. arguta) 엽조직의 캘러스로부터 완전한 식물체를 재분화시킬 수 있었다. 캘러스는 옥신류(2,4-D, NAA: 0.1~0.5 mg/l)와 싸이토키닌류(BA: 0.1~0.2 mg/l)를 조함하여 첨가된 MS배지에 엽절편체를 배양하여 캘러스를 유도하였다. 가장 높은 캘러스 유도율(96.2%)은 0.5 mg/1 2,4-D+0.1 mg/l NAA+0.05 mg/l BA의 처리구에서 나타났다. 신초유도는 1차 신초 유도배지에서 1.0 mg/l BA+0.05 mg/l IBA 혹은 2.0 mg/l BA+0.05 mg/l lBA 첨가구에서만 소수의 신초가 유도되었다. 그러나 캘러스를 1.0, 2.0 혹은 5.0 mg/l zeatin의 단독처리구 혹은 BA, TDZ 혹은 zeatin이 첨가된 2차 신초 유도배지처리구에서 다경유도가 가능하였지만 BA 첨가구에는 그 농도에 관계없이 다경유도는 이루어지지 않아 잡종키위의 캘러스로부터 신초유도시 BA첨가는 별 효과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 신초로부터 발근은 기내발근 [Standardi (St)+1.0 mg/l IBA]시 가장 높은 발근율(83.3%)를 보였지만 500 mg/l IBA의 수용액에 신초를 1시간동안 침지한 처리구에서 가장 저조한 발근율(40.0%)을 보였다. 줄기와 뿌리가 유도된 완전한 식물체를 재분화가 가능하였고 순화 또한 성공적으로 이루어졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barbieri, C. and S. Morini. 1987. Plant regeneration from Actinidia callus cultures. Joumal of Horticultural Science 62: 107-109 https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1987.11515757
  2. Cho, J.K., Lee, B.S., Hong, S.H., Hur, S.D. and Noh, E.W. 1995. Characteristics of the hybrids Actinidia deliciosa x A. arguta. Forest Genetics Research Institute Research Note 51: 8
  3. Gonzlez, M.V., Rey, M. and Rodriguez R (1995) Plant regeneration from petioles of kiwifruit microshoots. Hort-Science 30: 1302-1203
  4. Harada, H 1975. In vitro organ culture of Actinidia chinens is P1. as a technique for vegetative multiplication. Journal of Horticultural Science 50: 81-83 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1975.11514606
  5. Jansen, B. and Gardner, R.C. 1993. The use of transient GUS expression to develop an Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer system for kiwifruit. Plant Cell Reports 13: 28-31
  6. Kim, Y.W. and Moon, H.K. 2005. Plant regeneration rom cell suspension culture using leaf callus in Actinidia deliciosa x A. arguta clone 118. Korean Journal of Plant Biotechnology 32: 287-292 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2005.32.4.287
  7. Marino, G. and Battistini, S. 1990. Leaf-callus growth, shoot regeneration and somaclonal variation in Actinidia deliciosa: Effect of media pH. Acta Horticulturae 280: 37-44
  8. Monette, P.L. 1986. Micropropagation of kiwifruit using non-axenic shoot tips. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 6:73-82 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037760
  9. Moon, H.K., Kwon, Y.J. and Lee, B.S. 2001. Micropropa-gation of the hybrids of Actinidia deliciosax A. arguta by tissue culture. Korean Journal of Plant Biotechnology 28: 227-230
  10. Muleo, R. and Morini, S. 1990. Effect of light quality on regeneration from callus of Actinidia deliciosa. Acta Horticulturae 280: 155-158
  11. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-497 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  12. Oliveira, M.M. and Pais. M.S.M. 1991. Plant regeneration from protoplasts of long-term callus cultures of Actinidia deliciosa var. deliciosa cv. Hayward (Kiwifruit). Plant Cell Reports 9: 643-646
  13. Pedroso, M., Oliveira, M.M. and Pais, M.S.S. 1992. Micropropagation and simultaneous rooting of Actinidia deliciosa var. deliciosa 'Hayward'. HortScience 27: 443-445
  14. Revilla, M.A. and Power, J.B. 1988. Morphogenetic potential of long-term callus cultures of Actinidia deliciosa. Journal of Horticultural Science 63: 541-545 https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1988.11515890
  15. Standardi, A. 1983. La micropropagazione nella moltiplicazione dell'actinidia. Fruttioltura 45: 17-22
  16. Sugawara, F., Yamamoto, N. and Tanaka, O. 1994. Plant regeneration in in vitro culture of leaf, stem and petiole segments of Actinidia polygama Miq. Plant Tissue Culture Letter 11: 14-18 https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology1984.11.14
  17. Uematsu, C., Murase, M., Ichikawa, H. and Imamura, J. 1991. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration ofkiwi fruit. Plant Cell Reports 10: 286-290
  18. Xiao, Z.A., Wan, L.C. and Han, B.W. 2004. An interspecific somatic hybrid between Actinidia chinesis and Actinidia kolomikta and its chilling tolerance. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 79: 299-306 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-004-4611-7
  19. Zhang, Y.J., Qian, Y.Q., Mu, X.J., Cai, Q.G., Zhou, Y.L. and Wei, X.P. 1998. Plant regeneration from in vitro-cultured seedling leaf protoplasts of Actinidia eriantha Benth. Plant Cell Reports 17: 819-821 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050490