DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Gayal (Bos frontalis) and Yunnan Yellow Cattle (Bos taurus): Rumen Function, Digestibilities and Nitrogen Balance during Feeding of Pelleted Lucerne (Medicago sativum)

  • Deng, Weidong (Yunnan Provincial Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Wang, Liping (Yunnan Provincial Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Ma, Songcheng (Yunnan Provincial Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Jin, Bo (Yunnan Provincial Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • He, Tianbao (Nujiang District Animal Science and Veterinary Bureau) ;
  • Yang, Zhifang (Nujiang District Animal Science and Veterinary Bureau) ;
  • Mao, Huaming (Yunnan Provincial Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Faculty of Animal Science Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Wanapat, Metha (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University)
  • 투고 : 2006.09.27
  • 심사 : 2007.02.07
  • 발행 : 2007.06.01

초록

Three male Gayal (Bos frontalis) and three male Yunnan Yellow cattle (Bos taurus) were fed pelleted lucerne and measurements made of digestibility, nitrogen utilisation, rumen fermentation and microbial population and key plasma metabolites. Total actual dry matter intake was similar but when expressed in terms of live weight or metabolic live weight feed intakes were significantly higher (p<0.05) for Gayal than cattle. Apparent digestibilities of dry matter, organic matter, fibre and dietary nitrogen were similar for both Gayal and cattle. Rumen ammonia nitrogen and total volatile fatty acids were significantly higher (p<0.05) for Gayal than cattle and total numbers of viable rumen bacteria, cellulolytic and amylolytic bacteria, but not proteolytic bacteria nor protozoa, were significantly greater (p<0.05) for Gayal than cattle. Although Gayal have a different rumen ecology to cattle, similar digestive parameters were exhibited. Further research is required to establish relationship between rumen ecology and digestive parameters.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia.
  2. ARC. 1980. The Nutrient Requirement of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, UK.
  3. Bhambhani, R. and J. Kuspira. 1969. The somatic karyotypes of American bison and domestic cattle. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 11:243-249. https://doi.org/10.1139/g69-030
  4. Broderick, G. A. and J. H. Kang. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J. Dairy Sci. 63:64-75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
  5. Campbell, R. G. and M. R. Taverner. 1988. Genotype and sex effects on the relationship between energy intake and protein deposition in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 66:177-186.
  6. Cheng, P. 1984. Livestock Breeds of China. Animal Production and Health. Paper 46 (E, F, S). Publication by FAO, Rome.
  7. Chi, J., B. Fu, W. Nie, J. Wang, A. S. Graphodatsky and F. Yang. 2005. New insights into the karyotypic relationships of Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi), forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) and gayal (Bos frontalis). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 108:310-316. https://doi.org/10.1159/000081520
  8. De Liberto, T. J. and P. J. Urness. 1993. Comparative digestive physiology of American bison and Hereford cattle. In: Proceedings of 1st International Bison Conference, LaCrosse, WI. July 1993.
  9. Dong, Q. M., X. Q. Zhao, Y. S. Ma, S. X. Xu and Q. Y. Li. 2006. Live-weight gain, apparent digestibility, and economic benefits of yaks fed different diets during winter on the Tibetan plateau. Livest. Sci. 101:199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.11.009
  10. Gallagher, D. S. and J. E. Womack. 1992. Chromosome conservation in the Bovidae. J. Hered. 83:287-298. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111215
  11. Galyean, M. 1989. Laboratory Procedures in Animal Nutrition Research. New Mexico State University, USA.
  12. Ge, C. R., Y. B. Tian, T. Chen and Y. Wu. 1996. Studies on the meat feature of gayal (Bos frontalis) (in Chinese). Scientia Agri. Sinica. 29:75-78.
  13. Giasuddin, M. and M. R. Islam. 2003. Physical feature, physicalogical character and behavior study of gayal (Bos frontalis). Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:1599-1603. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.1599
  14. Giasuddin, M., K. S. Huque and J. Alam. 2003. Reproductive potentials of gayal (Bos frontalis) under semi-intensive management. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:331-334. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.331
  15. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagent, Procedures and Some Application): Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.
  16. Grant, R. H. and D. R. Mertens. 1992a. Influence of buffer pH and raw corn starch addition on in vitro fiber digestion kinetics. J. Dairy Sci. 75:2762-2768. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78039-4
  17. Grant, R. J. and D. R. Mertens. 1992b. Development of buffer systems for pH control and evaluation of pH effects on fiber digestion in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1581-1587. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77915-6
  18. Hawley, A. W. L. and D. G. Peden. 1982. Effects of ration, season and animal handling on composition of bison and cattle blood. J. Wildl. Dis. 18:321-338. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-18.3.321
  19. Hawley, A. W. L., D. G. Peden and W. R. Stricklin. 1981. Bison and Hereford steer digestion of sedge hay. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 61:165-174. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas81-022
  20. Houpt, T. R. 1970. Transfer of urea and ammonia to the rumen. In: Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (Ed. A. T. Phillipson). Oriel Press Ltd, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. pp. 119-131.
  21. Hungate, R. E. 1969. A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. In: Methods in Microbiology, Vol. 3B (Ed. J. R. Norris and D. W. Ribbons). Academic Press, London and New York. pp. 117-132.
  22. Huque, K. S., M. M. Rahman and M. A. Jalil. 2001a. Study on the growth pattern of gayals (Bos frontalis) and their crossbred calves. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1245-1249. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.1245
  23. Huque, K. S., M. M. Rahman and M. A. Jalil. 2001b. Nutritive value of major feed ingredients, usually browsed and their responses to gayals (Bos frontalis) in the hill tract area. Pak. J. Bio. Sci. 4:1559-1561. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2001.1559.1561
  24. Kamra, D. N. 2005. Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Curr. Sci. 89:124-135.
  25. Kanjanapruthipong, J. and B. Thaboot. 2006. Effects of neutral detergent fiber from rice straw on blood metabolites and productivity of dairy cows in the tropics center. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:356-362. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.356
  26. Kawashima, T., W. Summmal, P. Pholsen, R. Chaithiang and M. Kurihara. 2006. Comparative study on energy and nitrogen metabolisms between Brahman cattle and swamp buffalo fed with low quality diet. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 40:183-188. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.40.183
  27. Khampa, S., M. Wanapat, C. Wachirapakorn, N. Nontaso and M. Wattiaux. 2006. Effects of urea level and sodium dl-malate in concentrate containing high cassava chip on ruminal fermentation efficiency, microbial protein synthesis in lactating dairy cows raised under tropical condition. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:837-844. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.837
  28. Liang, J. B., M. Matsumoto and B. A. Young. 1994. Purine derivative excretion and ruminal microbial yield in Malaysian cattle and swamp buffalo. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 47:189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90123-6
  29. Mao, H. M., W. D. Deng and J. K. Wen. 2005. The biology characteristics of gayal (Bos frontalis) and potential exploitation and utilization (in Chinese). J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. 20:258-261.
  30. Mondal, M., A. Dhali, C. Rajkhowa and B. K. Prakash. 2004. Secretion patterns of growth hormone in growing captive mithuns (Bos frontalis). Zool. Sci. 21:1125-1129. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.21.1125
  31. Nishida, T., B. Eruden, K. Hosoda, H. Matsuyama, K. Nakagawa, T. Miyazawa and S. Shioya. 2006. Effects of green tea (Camellia sinensis) waste silage and polyethylene glycol on ruminal fermentation and blood components in cattle. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1728-1736. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1728
  32. Norton, B. W., J. B. Moran and J. V. Nolan. 1979. Nitrogen metabolism in Brahman cross, buffalo, banteng and Shorthorn steers fed on low-quality roughage. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 30:341-351. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9790341
  33. Pal, D. T., A. S. Singh, K. Vupru and K. M. Bujarbaruah. 2004. Growth performance and nutrient utilization in male and female Mithun calves on green forage-based diet. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 36:655-661. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TROP.0000042858.64001.31
  34. Peden, D. G., G. M. Van Dyne, R. W. Rice and R. M. Hansen. 1974. The trophic ecology of Bison bison L. on shortgrass plains. J. Appl. Ecol. 11:489-497. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402203
  35. Peters, H. F. 1958. A feedlot study of bison, cattalo and Hereford calves. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 38:87-90. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas58-012
  36. Piers, L. S., M. J. Soares, L. M. McCormack and K. O'Dea. 1998. Is there evidence for an age-related reduction in metabolic rate? J. Appl. Physiol. 85:2196-2204. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.6.2196
  37. Puppo, S., S. Bartocci, S. Terramoccia, F. Grandoni and A. Amici. 2002. Rumen microbial counts and in vivo digestibility in buffaloes and cattle given different diets. Anim. Sci. 75:323-329.
  38. Rajkhowa, S., D. K. Sarma and C. Rajkhowa. 2006. Seroprevalence of toxoplasma gondii antibodies in captive mithuns (Bos frontalis) from India. Vet. Parasitol. 135:369-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.007
  39. Richmond, R. J., R. J. Hudson and R. J. Christopherson. 1977. Comparison of forage intake and digestibility by American bison, yak, and cattle. Acta Theriol. 22:225-230. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.77-17
  40. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 6.4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
  41. Singh, S., K. Pradhan, S. K. Bhatia, D. C. Sangwan and V. Sagar. 1992. Relatives rumen microbial profile of cattle and buffalo fed wheat straw-concentration diet. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 62:1197-1202.
  42. Sommart, K. M., M. Wanapat, W. Wongsrikeao and S. Ngarmsak. 1993. Effect of yeast culture and protein levels on ruminal fermentation, intake, digestibility and performance in ruminants fed straw-based diets. In: World Conference on Animal Production (VolumeII). Edmonton, Alberta, Canda. pp. 60-61.
  43. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, New York.
  44. Varel, V. H. and B. A. Dehority. 1989. Ruminal cellulolytic bacteria and protozoa from Bison, cattle-bison hybrids, and cattle fed three alfalfa-corn diets. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:148-153.
  45. Vega, R. A., A. N. Del Barrio, P. P. Sangel, O. Katsube, R. M. Lapitan and T. Fujihara. 2004. Feed intake, ruminative chewing and nutrient digestibility of feedlot crossbred water buffalo and tropical grade Brahman. In: Proceedings of the 7th world buffalo congress (Volume II). October 20-23. Makati City, Philippines. pp. 375-383
  46. Wanapat, M., K. Sommart, C. Wachirapakorn, S. Uriyapongson and C. Wattanachant. 1994. Recent advances in swamp buffalo nutrition and feeding. In: Proceedings of the First Asian Buffalo Association Congress. Jannary 17-21, 1994, Khon Kaen, Thailand. pp. 155-187.
  47. Wanapat, M., N. Nontaso, C. Yuangklang, S. Wora-anu, A. Ngarmsang, C. Wachirapakorn and P. Rowlinson. 2003. Comparative study between swamp buffalo and native cattle in feed digestibility and potential transfer of buffalo rumen digesta into cattle. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:504-510. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.504
  48. Wanapat, M., C. Promkot and S. Wanapat. 2006. Effect of cassoy-urea pellet as a protein source in concentrate on ruminal fementation and digestibility in cattle. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1004-1009. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1004

피인용 문헌

  1. Dominant bacterial communities in the rumen of Gayals (Bos frontalis), Yaks (Bos grunniens) and Yunnan Yellow Cattle (Bos taurs) revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis vol.38, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-010-0627-8
  2. Deletion / insertion polymorphisms of the prion protein gene (PRNP) in gayal (Bos frontalis) pp.0973-7731, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-018-1005-x
  3. Phylogenetic Analysis of 16S rDNA Sequences Manifest Rumen Bacterial Diversity in Gayals (Bos frontalis) Fed Fresh Bamboo Leaves and Twigs (Sinarumdinaria) vol.20, pp.7, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1057
  4. Comparison of Gayal (Bos frontalis) and Yunnan Yellow Cattle (Bos taurus): In vitro Dry Matter Digestibility and Gas Production for a Range of Forages vol.20, pp.8, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1208
  5. Effect of Roughage Sources on Cellulolytic Bacteria and Rumen Ecology of Beef Cattle vol.20, pp.11, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1705
  6. Molecular Phylogeny of the Gayal in Yunnan China Inferred from the Analysis of Cytochrome b Gene Entire Sequences vol.21, pp.6, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70637
  7. Gene cloning and expression of fungal lignocellulolytic enzymes from the rumen of gayal (Bos frontalis) vol.64, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2017.02.010
  8. The Composition of Fungal Communities in the Rumen of Gayals ( Bos frontalis ), Yaks ( Bos grunniens ), and Yunnan and Tibetan Yellow Cattle ( Bos taurs ) vol.68, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2019-050
  9. Directed modification of a ruminal cellulase gene (CMC-1) from a metagenomic library isolated from Yunnan gayal (Bos frontalis) vol.202, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-01812-3