Establishment acceptable daily intakes(ADIs) for pesticides registered in Korea

국내등록농약의 일일섭취허용량(ADI) 설정

  • Lee, Je-Bong (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology) ;
  • Shin, Jin-Sup (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Yeon-Ki (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology) ;
  • You, Are-Sun (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology) ;
  • Hong, Soon-Sung (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology) ;
  • Im, Gun-Jae (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology) ;
  • Kang, Kyu-Young (Dept. of Environ. Biotechnology, Gyeong Sang National University)
  • 이제봉 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원) ;
  • 신진섭 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원) ;
  • 박연기 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원) ;
  • 유아선 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원) ;
  • 홍순성 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원) ;
  • 임건재 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원) ;
  • 강규영 (경상대학교 환경생명화학과)
  • Published : 2007.12.30

Abstract

In order to set ADIs for pesticides registered for use in Korea, an analysis of guidelines on setting ADIs and ADIs established by international bodies and advanced countries was conducted General guidelines on the derivation ADIs are very similar among regulatory authorities. However, there were large differences in the ADIs' setting status and ADI values set for some individual pesticides. ADIs were established for 213 pesticides in UN, 332 in USA, 230 in Japan, 219 in UK and 435 in EU and Australia. Of the established ADIs in other countries, 87 to 252 pesticides were the pesticides registered in Korea depending countries. The number of lowest ADIs depending countries was 32 in USA, 23 in Japan, 6 in EU and Australia. The key target organs and endpoints used for setting ADIs were in the order of enzyme inhibition, body weight change and adverse effect on liver. The number of ADIs used for setting MRLs in Korea was high in the order of JMPR, Japan and USA. ADIs of EU and JMPR had highest similarity among bodies investigated. By referring to the guidances investigated at this study, guideline for setting ADI and ADIs for 64 pesticides registered in Korea were proposed.

국내 사용농약에 대한 ADI를 설정하기 위하여 국제기구 및 선진국의 ADI설정 기준, 설정현황 등을 조사 분석하였다. 설정기준은 설정기관 별로 유사하였으며, ADI는 국제연합(UN) 213종, 미국 332종, 일본 230종, 영국 219종, 유럽공동체 및 호주 435종의 농약에 대하여 설정되어 있었으며, 국내 등록농약은 국가별로 $87{\sim}252$종까지 포함되어 있었다. 국가별 최저 ADI값을 분석한 결과 미국이 32종으로 가장 많았으며 일본 23, 유럽연합 호주 6성분이었다. 미국에 등록된 농약의 RfD설정 시 사용된 표적장기 및 endpoint 는 효소저해, 체중변화, 간에 대한 영향 등의 순이었다. 또한 국내 MRL설정에 사용된 선진국 설정 ADI 수는 JMPR, 일본, 미국 순이었으며, 유럽연합과 JMPR의 ADI 값은 비교한 국가 중 가장 유사성이 높았다. 또한 본 연구에서는 조사 분석된 선진국 및 국제기구의 ADI설정 가이드라인을 참조하여 국내 등록농약에 대한 ADI 설정 원칙을 제시하고 64종 농약에 대한 ADI를 설정하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrew G. R. (2002) Pesticide residue analysis and its relationship to hazard characterization(ADI/ARfD) and intake estimations(NEDI/NESTI), Pest Manag Sci 58 : 1073-1082 https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.544
  2. Edward G. III., L. B. Karen, and M. B. Charles (2000) Comparison of U.S. EPA and JMPR safety standards for pesticides, as of June 2000
  3. IPCS/lNCHEM (2002) JMPR monographs and evaluation : http://www.inchem.org/pages/jmpr.html
  4. Japan/ Food Safety Commission (2007) http://www.fsc.go.jp/hyouka/ hy_nouyaku.html
  5. UK PSD(ACP) (2003) A guide to pesticide regulation in the UK and the role of the advisory committee on pesticide
  6. UK/PSD (2007) Mnograph : http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/psd_evaluation_all.asp
  7. US EPA (2002) A review of the reference dose and reference concentration processes
  8. US EPA (2002) Determination of the appropriate FQPA safety factor(s) in tolerance assessment
  9. US EPA (2004) Acute and Chronic Reference Dose
  10. US EPA (2004) Guidance for Hazard Identification and Toxicity Endpoint Selection
  11. WHO/IPCS (2002) Inventory of IPCS and other WHO pesticide evaluations and summary of toxicological evaluations performed by the Joint Meeting on Pesticides Residues(JMPR) through 2002
  12. 농림부 (2005) 농약안전사용 실무교육
  13. 농업과학기술원 (2001-2005) 농약안전성심위위원회 소위원회 자료
  14. 농업과학기술원 (2006) EU 국가의 농약안전성 평가관리기법 연구
  15. 한국과학기술연구원과 한국산업기술진흥협회 (2000) 진보된 안전성 평가와 환경호르몬 검출기법
  16. Europa (2007) From the farm to the fork-status of active substances under the EU review. http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/pesticides/index_en.htm
  17. United Nation (2005) Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals(GHS)