References
- Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO, Non-carious cervical lesion. J Dent 22: 195-207, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90107-4
- Grippo JO, Simring M, Schreiner S. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfration revisited - A new perspective on tooth surface lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 135:1109-1118, 2004 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0369
- Grippo JO. Abfractions: A new classification of hard tissue lesions of tooth. J Esthet Dent 3(1):14-19, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00799.x
- Rees JS. A review of the Biomechanics of abfraction. Eur J Prosthdont Restor Dent 7(4): 139-144, 1993
- Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of non-carious cervical lesion. J Am Dent Assoc 133:725-733, 2002 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0268
- Bader JD, Levich LC, Shugars DA, Heymann HO, Mcclure F. How dentists classified & treated non-carious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 124:46-54, 1993 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0112
- Grippo JO. Non-carious cervical lesions: The decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent 4:55-64, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00721.x
- Blunck U. Improving cervical restorations: A Review of Materials and Techniques. J Adhes Dent 3:33-44, 2001
- Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69: 1240-1243, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301
- Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative system. J Prosthet Dent 64:658-664, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-J
- Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 27: 775-784, 1996
- Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations-a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 18:295-303, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00042-2
- Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Oper Dent 20:7-13, 1995
- Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Patra AK. Cohen RE. An assessment of stress analyses in the theory of abfraction. Biomed Mater Eng 14:311-321. 2004
- Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 106: 1028-1032. 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106608.x
- Tanaka M. Naito T. Yokota M, Kohno M. Finite element analysis of the possible mechanism of cervical lesion formation by occlusal force. J Oral Rehabil 30: 60-67, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00959.x
- Rees JS. Hammadeh M. Undermining of enamel as a mechanism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 112:347-352, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00143.x
- Son YH. Cho BH. Um CM. Finite element stress analysis of class V composite resin restoration subjected to cavity forms and placement methods. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 25(1):91-108, 2000
- Um CM, Kwon HC. Son HH. Cho BH. Rim YI. Finite element analysis of stress distribution according to cavity design of class V composite resin filling. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 25(1) :67-74, 1999
- Lindehe J, Karring T. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. 2nd edition. Munksgaard. Copenhagen. p19-69, 1989
- Schroeder HE, Page RC. Periodontal Diseases. 2nd edition. Lea & Fabiger, Philadelphia. p3-52, 1990
- Rubin C, Krishnamurthy N. Capilouto E. Yi H. Stress analysis of the human tooth using a three-dimensional finite element model. J Dent Res 62:82-86, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021701
- Katona TR. Winkler MM. Stress analysis of a bulkfilled class V light-cured composite restoration. J Dent Res 73(8):1470-1477, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730081201
- Geramy A. Sharafoddin F. Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. Quintessence Int 34(7): 526-533. 2003
- Le SY, Chiang HC. Huang HM. Shih YH. Chen HC. Dong DR, Lin CT. Thermo-debonding mechanisms in dentin bonding systems using finite element analysis. Biomaterials 22(2): 113-123, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00086-7
- Kleverlaan CJ. Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composite. Dent Mater article in press. 2005
- Osborne-Smith KL. Burke FJT. Mc Farlane T, Wilson NHF. Effect of restored and unrestored non-carious cervical lesions on the fracture resistance of previously restored maxillary premolar teeth. J Dent 26:427-433, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00029-8
- Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanics of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence lnt 31 (4): 267-273, 2000
- Leinfelder KF. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 15: 1396-1400, 1994
- Yaman SD, Sahin M, Aydin C. Finite element analysis of strength characteristics of various resin based restorative material in Class V cavities. J Oral Rehabil 30:630-641. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01028.x
- Browning WD, Bracket WW. Gilpatrick RO. Retention of microfilled and hybrid resin-based composite in noncarious class 5 lesions: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 24:26-30. 1999
- Grippo JO, Simring M. Dental 'erosion' revisited. J Am Dent Assoc 126:619-630. 1995 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0241
- Lee WC. Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: Review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 75:487-494, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90451-5
Cited by
- The influence of occlusal loads on stress distribution of cervical composite resin restorations: A three-dimensional finite element study vol.33, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.3.246