References
- Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 18:269-296. 1974
- Luiten DJ. Morgan LA. Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. A comparison of four instrumentation techniques on apical canal transportation. J Endod 21:26-32, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80553-4
- Weine F, Kelly R. Lio P. The effect of preparation procedures on the original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1 : 255-262, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9
- Walia H, Brantly WA. Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14: 346-351. 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
- Gluskin AH, Brown DC, Buchanan LS. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J 34:476-484, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00422.x
- Tasdemir T, Aydemir UI, Inan U, Unal O. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography. Int Endod J 38, 402-408, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00961.x
- Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved canals, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radiol Endod 32:271-275, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
- Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14:273-277. 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80025-6
- Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP, A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation, J Endod 13:243-245, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80099-7
- Rhodes JS, Pitt Ford TR. Lynch JA, Liepins PJ, Curtis RV. A comparison of two nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques in teeth using microcomputed tomography. Int Endod J 33, 279-285, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00306.x
- Peters OA. Laib A. Ruegsegger P, Barbakow F. Threedimensional analysis of root canal geometry using high-resolution computed tomography. J Dent Res 79:1405-1409, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790060901
- Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:228-233, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92
- Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36: 288-295, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00650.x
- Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K. Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analyzed by micro CT. Int Endod J 36:86-92, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00626.x
- Bergmans E, Van Cleynenbreugel J. Wevers M. Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments: rationale. performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 14:324-333. 2001
- Wildey WL, Senia S. Montgomery S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 74:499-507. 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90303-8
- Ruddle CJ. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 8th edn. St. Louis. MO: Mosby. p256, 2002
- Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper Endodontic System: Geometries. Features, and Guidelines for Use. Dent Today 20: 60-67, 2001
- Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY. Jung IY, Lee SJ. Lee CY. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 26: 719-723, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013
- Park H. A comparison of greater taper files, ProFiles. and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91: 715-718. 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114159
- Schafer E. Florek H. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 36: 199-207, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00643.x
- Stone R, Zuolo M, Walton R. Apical transportaion: steel vs NiTi hand vs Ni-Ti rotary. J Endod 21: 216 (abstract). 1995
- Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 21: 173-176, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80560-1
- Bryant ST, Dummer PMH, Pitoni C, Bourba M, Moghal S. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 32:155-164, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00256.x
- Peters OA, Schonenberger K. Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. Int Endod J 34:221-230, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00373.x