Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of adhesive thickness on microtensile bond strength to the cavity wall

와동벽에서 접착제의 두께가 미세인장 결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Hwa-Eon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 이화언 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2007.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to examine the variability of adhesive thickness on the different site of the cavity wall when used total-etch system without filler and simplified self-etch system with filler and to evaluate the relationship between variable adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength to the cavity wall. A class I cavity in six human molars was prepared to expose all dentinal walls. Three teeth were bonded with a filled adhesive, $Clearfil^{TM}$ SE bond ana the other three teeth were bonded with unfilled adhesives, $Scotchbond^{TM}$ Multi Purpose. Morphology and thickness of adhesive layer were examined using fluorescence microscope. Bonding agent thickness was measured at three points along the axial cavity wall edge of cavity margin (rim). halfway down each cavity wall (h1f), internal angle of the cavity (ang). After reproducing the adhesive thickness at rim, h1f and ang, micro-tensile bond strength were evaluated. For both bonding agents, adhesive thickness of ang was significantly thicker than that of rim and h1f (P <0.05). As reproduced the adhesive thickness, microtensile bond strength was increased as adhesive thickness was increased in two bonding agents. Adhesive thickness of internal angle of the cavity was significantly thicker than that of the cavity margin and the halfway cavity wall for both bonding agents. Microtensile bond strength of the thick adhesive layer at the internal angle of the cavity was higher than that of the thin adhesive layer at 1,he cavity margin and the halfway cavity in the two bonding systems.

이 연구의 목적은 와동벽에서 다른 위치에서의 상아질 접착제의 두께를 평가하고, 이런 다양한 접착제의 두께와 미세 인장 강도 사이의 관계를 평가하기 위한 것이다. 여섯 개의 인간 대구치에 모든 상아질 면이 노출되도록 I급 와동을 형성하였다 3개의 치아는 filled adhesive ($Clearfil^{TM}$ SE bond)를 와동 내에 도포하였고, 다른 3개의 치아는 unfilled adhesives ($Scotchbond^{TM}$ Multi Purpose)를 도포하였다. 형광 현미경을 이용하여 접착층의 형태와 두께를 관찰하였다. 접착제의 두께는 수직 와동벽을 따라 와동 변연, 와동벽 1/2, 와동 내각의 세 지점에서 측정되었다. $Scotchbond^{TM}$ Multi Purpose와 $Clearfil^{TM}$ SE bond가 와동 변연과 와동벽 1/2, 와동 내각에서의 접착제의 두께를 재현하여 미세 인장 결합 강도를 측정하였다. 이 실험의 결과에서 두 가지 상아질 접착제 모두에서 와동 내각에서의 접착제의 두께가 와동 변연과 와동벽 1/2위치에서의 두께보다 두꺼웠으며, 와동 내각의 두꺼운 접착제의 미세 인장 결합 강도는 와동 변연과 와동벽 1/2에서의 얇은 접착제 두께의 미세 인장 결합 강도보다 유의성 있게 높게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin bonding mechanism. J Esthetic Dent 3(4): 133-138, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00985.x
  2. Frankenberger R. Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25(4):324-330, 2000
  3. Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH. Schmalz G. Bond strength of self-adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clin Orallnvestig 6(3): 155-160, 2002
  4. Perdigao J, Lopes M. Dentin bonding-questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1(3) 191-209, 1999
  5. Grossman ES, Setzer S. Bonding Agents: Adhesive layer thickness and retention to cavity surfaces with time. SAD J 56(6) :266-272, 2001
  6. Peter A, Paul SJ, Luthy H. Scharer P. Film thickness of various dentine bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil 24(8): 568-573, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00547.x
  7. Meerbeek BV, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26(1):120, 1998
  8. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Meerbeek BV, Braem M, Yildiz E. Yucel T, Vanherle G. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 9(4): 167-173, 1996
  9. Retief DH. Wendt SL, Bradley EL. The effect of adhesive thickness on the shear bond strength of Scotchbond 2/Silux to dentin. Am J Dent 2(6): 341-344, 1998
  10. Zheng L, Pereira PNR. Nakajima M, Sano H. Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26(1): 97-104, 2001
  11. Gallo JR. Comeaux R. Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems. Oper Dent 26(1) :44-47, 2001
  12. Fortin D, Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives, Dent Mater 10(4) :253-258, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90070-1
  13. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentine. Am J Dent 8(6) :297-302, 1995
  14. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part III. Quintessence Int 24(8): 571-582, 1993
  15. Staninec M, Marshall GW, Kawakami M, Low A. Bond strength, interfacial characterization and fracture surface anylysis for a new stress-breaking bonding agent. J Prosthet Dent 74(5) :469-475, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80347-6
  16. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Verdonschot EH. Adaptation and radiographic evaluation of four adhesive systems. J Dent 25(5):391-397, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00048-6
  17. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS. The effect of air thinning on dentin adhesive bond strength. Oper Dent 20(4): 133-137, 2001
  18. Perdigao J, Lopes M, Gomes G. Ultramorphology of the hybrid layer - a TEM study of non-decalcified interfaces. J Dent Res 79:336, 2000
  19. Erickson RL. Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. Oper Dent Suppl 5:81-94, 1992
  20. Meerbeek BV, lnokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 71(8): 1530-1540, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710081301
  21. Staninec M, Kawakami M. Adhesion and microleakage tests of a new dentin bonding system. Dent Mater 9(3) :204-208, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90121-6
  22. Fanning DE, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW, Bagley AL. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength of three dentinal bonding agents. Gen Dent 43(3) :256-262, 1995
  23. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properites related to bonding. J Dent 25(6) :441-458, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00065-6

Cited by

  1. The effect of Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation on microtensile bond strength of composite resin restoration vol.35, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.134
  2. Effect of Chlorhexidine Application Methods on Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin in Class I Cavities vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2341/09-360-L