Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT WITH DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS FOR ADULT CLASS II MALOCCLUSION PATIENT WITH CONDYLAR RESORPTION

악관절 흡수양상을 보이는 성인 하악 후퇴증 환자에서 양측 하악골 골신장술을 이용한 하악 전진술

  • Paeng, Jun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Woo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Yong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hwang, Soon-Jung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seo, Byoung-Moo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choung, Pill-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 팽준영 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이상우 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이진용 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 명훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 황순정 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 서병무 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최진영 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이종호 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정필훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김명진 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2007.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Distraction osteogenesis is considered to take favorable effect on the TMJ and be beneficial to prevent the relapse after the mandibular advancement of Class II malocclusion patient. This is the report with literature review on the mandibular advancement in the patients showing preoperative condylar resorption and who need larger amount of advancement. Patients and method: Distraction osteogenesis using intraoral device was performed for three mandibular hypoplasia patients (one male and two females). All patients were adult over 18 years old. The patients showed condylar bony resorption preoperatively. The distraction was performed intraorally with modified SSRO. After 7 days of latency period, activation was performed at the rate of 1.0 mm/day with twice turn. The devices were removed after 4-8 month consolidation period. Results: Total advancement of mandible was average 13 mm. One patient showed openbite immediately after removal of distraction device. It took long time to guide the openbite with elastics. The comparison between cephalometries immediately after device removal and postoperative six month revealed average 3.4 mm relapse. This means that mandibular advancement with distraction osteogenesis needs overcorrection and elastic rehabilitation even after enough consolidation periods. Conclusion: Larger amount of mandibular advancement could be achieved with distraction osteogenesis in severe mandibular hypoplasia with condylar resorption. However, some relapse was found during the follow-up period and the over correction is considered to be needed. The effect of distraction osteogenesis seems to be investigated with long-term follow-up.

Keywords

References

  1. Van Sickels JE : A comparative study of bicortical screws and suspension wires versus bicortical screws in large mandibular advancements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 : 1293, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90305-6
  2. McDonald WR : Stability of mandibular lengthening: a comparison of moderate and large advancements. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2 : 729, 1990
  3. Shardt-Sacco, Turvey TA and Proffit WR : Stability of large advancements greater than 8 mm. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(suppl) : 105, 1996
  4. Will LA and West RA : Factors influencing the stability of the sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47 : 813, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(89)80039-4
  5. Reynolds ST, Ellis E, 3rd and Carlson DS : Adaptation of the suprahyoid muscle complex to large mandibular advancements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46 : 1077, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(88)90454-5
  6. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH and Grayson BH : Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 : 1, 1992
  7. Rozenthal W : Kiefergelenksankylose und Mikrogenie. Dtsche Zahnaerztl Z 4 : 786, 1949
  8. Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM and Browne EZ, Jr. : Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 51 : 506, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197305000-00003
  9. Michieli S and Miotti B : Lengthening of mandibular body by gradual surgical-orthodontic distraction. J Oral Surg 35 : 187, 1977
  10. Molina F and Ortiz MF : Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 96 : 825, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199509001-00010
  11. Klein C and Howaldt HP : Correction of mandibular hypoplasia by means of bidirectional callus distraction. J Craniofac Surg 7 : 258, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199607000-00002
  12. Diner PA, Kollar EM, Martinez H and Vazquez M : Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: a technical innovation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 24 : 92, 1996
  13. Hoppenreijs TJ, van der Linden FP, Freihofer HP, et al. : Occlusal and functional conditions after surgical correction of anterior open bite deformities 8. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 11: 29, 1996
  14. Van Sickels JE, Dolce C, Keeling S, et al.: Technical factors accounting for stability of a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement: wire osteosynthesis versus rigid fixation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89 : 19, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(00)80008-6
  15. Bouwman JP, Kerstens HC and Tuinzing DB : Condylar resorption in orthognathic surgery. The role of intermaxillary fixation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78 : 138, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90135-X
  16. Hoppenreijs TJ, Freihofer HP, Stoelinga PJ, Tuinzing DB and van't Hof MA : Condylar remodelling and resorption after Le Fort I and bimaxillary osteotomies in patients with anterior open bite. A clinical and radiological study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27 : 81, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80301-9
  17. Kerstens HC, Tuinzing DB, Golding RP and van der Kwast WA : Condylar atrophy and osteoarthrosis after bimaxillary surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 69 : 274, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90286-2
  18. Fisher E, Staffenberg DA, McCarthy JG, Miller DC and Zeng J : Histopathologic and biochemical changes in the muscles affected by distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 99 : 366, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199702000-00009
  19. Walker DA : Management of severe mandibular retrognathia in the adult patient using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 1341, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.35735
  20. Moore KE, Gooris PJ and Stoelinga PJ : The contributing role of condylar resorption to skeletal relapse following mandibular advancement surgery: report of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 : 448, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90166-J
  21. Thurmuller P, Troulis MJ, Rosenberg A, Chuang SK and Kaban LB : Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64 : 249, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.010
  22. Herford AS, Hoffman R, Demirdji S, et al. : A comparison of synovial fluid pressure after immediate versus gradual mandibular advancement in the miniature pig. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 775, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.02.013
  23. van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG, Perdijk FB and Tuinzing DB : Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96 : 392, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00472-4
  24. Huang CS and Ross RB : Surgical advancement of the retrognathic mandible in growing children. Am J Orthod 82 : 89, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90488-2
  25. van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG and Tuinzing DB : Stability after distraction osteogenesis to lengthen the mandible: results in 50 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 : 304, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.02.003
  26. Makarov MR, Harper RP, Cope JB and Samchukov ML : Evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve function during distraction osteogenesis in the dog. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56 : 1417, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90407-4
  27. Hu J, Tang Z, Wang D and Buckley MJ : Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59 : 1041, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.25849
  28. Altuna G, Walker DA and Freeman E : Rapid orthopedic lengthening of the mandible in primates by sagittal split osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis: a pilot study. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 10 : 59, 1995
  29. Choi JY, Hwang KG, Baek SH, et al. : Original sagittal split osteotomy revisited for mandibular distraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29 : 165, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2001.0211
  30. Schumacher B, Keller J and Hvid I : Distraction effects on muscle. Leg lengthening studied in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 65 : 647, 1994 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679408994623
  31. Simpson AH, Williams PE, Kyberd P, Goldspink G and Kenwright J : The response of muscle to leg lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 : 630, 1995
  32. Castano FJ, Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Kaban LB and Yates KE : Proliferation of masseter myocytes after distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59 : 302, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.21000
  33. Mackool RJ, Hopper RA, Grayson BH, Holliday R and McCarthy JG : Volumetric change of the medial pterygoid following distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: an example of the associated soft-tissue changes. Plast Reconstr Surg 111 : 1804, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000055431.19215.0A
  34. Hollier LH, Rowe NM, Mackool RJ, et al. : Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible. Part III: Laboratory studies of sagittal (anteroposterior) and horizontal (mediolateral) movements. J Craniofac Surg 11 : 83, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200011020-00004
  35. Williams JK, Rowe NM, Mackool RJ, et al. : Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible, Part II: Laboratory studies of sagittal (anteroposterior) and vertical (superoinferior) movements. J Craniofac Surg 9 : 504, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199811000-00004
  36. McCarthy JG, Williams JK, Grayson BH and Crombie JS : Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible: device development and clinical application. J Craniofac Surg 9 : 322, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199807000-00006
  37. Kunz C, Hammer B and Prein J : Manipulation of callus after linear distraction: a "lifeboat"or an alternative to multivectorial distraction osteogenesis of the mandible? Plast.Reconstr Surg 105 : 674, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200002000-00029
  38. Hoffmeister B, Marcks C and Wolff KP : The floating bone concept in intraoral mandibular distraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (Suppl) 26 : 76, 1998
  39. Grayson BH, McCormick S, Santiago PE and McCarthy JG : Vector of device placement and trajectory of mandibular distraction. J Craniofac Surg 8 : 473, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199711000-00009
  40. Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Harper RP and Ross JD : Biomechanical considerations of mandibular lengthening and widening by gradual distraction using a computer model. J.Oral Maxillofac.Surg 56 : 51, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90916-8