Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identifying Spatial Hazard Ranking Using Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques

다기준 의사결정기법을 이용한 공간위험 순위산정

  • 정은성 (서울대학교 공학연구소) ;
  • 이길성 (서울대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학부)
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study developed a ten-step procedure of integrated watershed management (IWM) for sustainability to rehabilitate the distorted hydrologic cycle and identified spatial hazard ranking(step 2). Spatial hazard indices, Potential flood damage (PFD), potential streamflow depletion (PSD), potential water quality deterioration (PWQD), and watershed evaluation index (WEI) were developed using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques and sustainability evaluation concept(pressure-state-response model). The used MCDM techniques are composite programming, compromise programing, Regime method, and EVAMIX approach which are classified by data availability and objectives (prefeasibility and feasibility).

본 연구에서는 도시화로 인해 왜곡된 물순환을 치수, 이수, 수질관리 등의 측면에서 건전화시키기 위해 지속가능한 유역통합관리 계획을 수립하기 위한 10단계의 절차와 적용방법을 개발하여 제시하였으며 이 중 Step 2에 해당하는 문제점 도출 및 우선순위 결정 단계를 수행하였다. 유역의 잠재적인 위험도를 나타내는 홍수피해잠재능(PFD), 건천잠재능(PSD), 수질오염잠재능(PWQD), 유역평가지수(WEI)를 산정하기 위해 다기준 의사결정기법과 지속가능성평가지수 개념을 사용하였다. 사용된 다기준 의사결정 기법들은 복합계획법, 타협계획법, Regime, ELECTRE II, EVAMIX 방법이며 자료의 가용성과 목적(예비타당성, 타당성)에 따라 다르게 사용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김우구, 이광만, 박두호 (2006). 'MCDA 기법을 이용한 댐사업의 투자우선순위 결정.' 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제39권, 제12호, pp. 1067～1080 https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.12.1067
  2. 문장원, 박희성, 최시중, 이동률, 윤석영 (2005). '국가 수자원 계획의 수립을 위한 K-WEAP의 적용.' 한국수자원학회 05 학술발표회논문집, pp. 1507-1511
  3. 박재로 (2006). '자연과 사람이 어우러지는 생태하천 조성.' 환경기술, 제22호, pp. 5-18
  4. 박태선 (2002). '계층분석법을 이용한 하천의 중요도 평가기법.' 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제35권, 제6호, pp. 685～692
  5. 심명필 (2004). 치수사업 경제성분석 방법 연구. 한국수자원학회, 건설교통부
  6. 이길성, 정은성, 신문주, 김영오 (2006a). '도시유역의 건천화 방지를 위한 지속가능한 수자원 계획: 1. 이론.' 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제39권, 제11호, pp. 935-946 https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.11.935
  7. 이길성, 정은성, 신문주, 김영오 (2006b). '도시유역의 건천화 방지를 위한 지속가능한 수자원 계획: 2. 적용.' 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제39권, 제11호, pp. 947-960 https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.11.947
  8. 정은성 (2007). 다기준 의사결정기법을 이용한 지속가능한 유역통합관리. 박사학위논문, 서울대학교
  9. 정태성, 강신욱, 고익환, 황만하 (2007). '금강유역에서의 KModSim을 이용한 의사결정지원시스템 개발 및 적용성 검토.' 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 제27권, 제3B호, pp. 319-329
  10. 한국수자원학회 (2001). 유역종합치수계획 수립지침작성. 건설교통부
  11. 환경부 (2003). 오염총량관리제도 해설
  12. Argarwal, A., Angels, M.S., Ghatia, R., Cheret, I., Davila-Polete, S., Falkenmark, M., Gonzalez, F., Jonch-Clausen, T., Ait Kadi, M., Kindler, J., Rees, J., Roberts, P., Rogers, P., Solanes, M., and Wright, A. (2000). Integrated Water Resource Management. TAC Background Paper No. 4, Stockholm, Sweden: Global Water Partnership
  13. Armitage, D. (1995). 'An integrative methodological framework for sustainable environmental planning and management.' Environmental Management, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 469-479 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471961
  14. Benayoun, R., Roy, B., and Sussman, B. (1966). 'ELECTRE: Use method pour guider le choixen presence de points de vue multiples.' Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail, No. 49, Paris, France
  15. Brussock, P.P., Brown, A.V., and Dixon, J.C. (1985). 'Channel form and stream ecosystem models.' Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 21, pp. 859-866 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1985.tb00180.x
  16. Cardwell, H., Cartwright, L., and Martin, L. (2004). Integrated Water Resource Management: Definitions and Principles, Impediments and Solutions. Draft Version 3. Alexandria, Virginia, United States Army Coprs of Engineers Institute for Water Resources
  17. Dourojeanni, A., Jouravlev, A., and Chavez, G. (2002). Gestion del Agua a Nivel de Cuencas: Teoria y Practica. Serie recursos naturales e infraestructura No. 46. Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribean, Division of Natural Resources and Infrastructure
  18. Gibbons, J.D. (1971). Nonparametric Statistical Inference. McGraw-Hill, New York
  19. Global Water Partnership (2005). IWRM - At a Glance: Technical Advisory Committe. Global Water Partnership Secretariat, Stockholm
  20. Hagemeister, M.E., Jones, D.D., and Woldt, W.E. (1995). 'Hazard ranking of landfills using fuzzy composite programming.' Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 4, pp. 248-258 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1996)122:4(248)
  21. Heathcote, I.W. (1998). Integrated Watershed Management. John Wiley & Sons, New York
  22. Hinloopen, E., and Nijkamp, P. (1990). 'Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysis, the dominant regime method.' Quality and Quantity, Vol. 24, pp. 37-56 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221383
  23. Janssen, R, (1992). Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Management. Kluwer Academic Publisher
  24. IUCN (2003). Basin Management and Devolution of Authority. Water Law Series - Issue 3. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom: IUCN Environmental Law Center
  25. Kirshen, P.H. (2005). 'Use of indicators in integrated water resources management.' 2005 EWRI World Water Congress, ASCE
  26. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., and Hokkanen, J. (2000). 'Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management.' Environmental Management, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 595-605 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010118
  27. Mosley, M.P. (1987). 'The classification and characteristics of rivers.' Rivers Channels: Environment and Processes (Richard K. ed.). Blackwell
  28. OECD (1993). 'OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews.' OECD Environment Monographs, No. 83, OECD, Paris
  29. Rosgen, D.L. (1994). A Classification of Natural Rivers. Cetena 22, pp. 169-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(94)90001-9
  30. Roy, B., and Bertier, B. (1971). 'La methode ELECTRE II: Une methode de classment en presence de criteres multiples.' Direction Scientifique, Groupe Metra, Note de Travail, No. 142, Paris, France
  31. Satty, T.L. (1977). 'A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.' Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 234-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  32. Schumm, S.A., and Lichty, R.W. (1963). 'Channel widening and floodplain construction along the Cimarron River in southwestern Kansas.' U.S Geological Survey Professional Paper 352D
  33. Thomas, J.S., and Durham, B. (2003). 'Integrated water resource management: Looking at the whole picture.' Desalination, Vol. 156, pp. 21-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00320-5
  34. US EPA (2005). Handbook for Development of Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters. EPA-841-B-05-005, Washington, D.C., USEPA
  35. Voogd, H. (1982). 'Multicriteria evaluation with mixed qualitative and quantitative data.' Environment and Planning B, Vol. 9, pp. 221-236 https://doi.org/10.1068/b090221
  36. World Bank (2003). Water Resources Sector Strategy. Strategic Directions for World Bank Engagement, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Inherent Flood Vulnerability in Seoul Administrative Districts Using Flood Protection Capacity and Damage Matrix vol.14, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.2.299
  2. Establishing Indicators and Stream Depletion Potential Index (SDPI) for Stream Health vol.15, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.2.285
  3. Degree of the Contribution of Disaster and Safety Education as an Index of Climate Change Vulnerability vol.15, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.8.5349
  4. Comparative Studies of MCDM for Vulnerability Analysis in Gamcheon Basin vol.15, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.5.215
  5. Group Decision Making Approach to Flood Vulnerability Assessment vol.46, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.2.99