Quantitative Comparison and Analysis of Decommissioning Scenarios Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method and Digital Mock-up System

계층화 분석과정법과 디지털 목업을 이용한 정량적 해체 시나리오 평가

  • Published : 2007.09.30

Abstract

This paper presents a scenario evaluation model of the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to evaluate dismantling scenarios considering quantitative and qualitative considerations. And decommissioning information producing modules which can obtain a dismantling schedule, quantify radioactive waste, visualize a radioactive inventory, estimate a decommissioning cost, and estimate a worker's exposure was developed to assess qualitatively decommissioning information. The digital mock-up (DMU) system was developed to verify dismantling processes and find error of scenarios in virtual space. It combines and manages the decommissioning information producing modules, the decommissioning DB, and the dismantling evaluation module synthetically. By using AHP model and DMU system, the thermal column in KRR-1 was evaluated on plasma arc cutting scenario and nibbler cutting scenario using the developed decommissioning DMU system.

본 논문에서는 해체 시나리오를 정량적 및 정성적 고려사항을 반영하여 평가하기 위하여 계층적분석이론(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)을 이용한 평가모델을 개발하였으며 또한 해체 시나리오의 정량적인 자료산출을 위하여 해체일정, 폐기물량, 방사화 가시화, 해체비용, 작업자 피폭량 등과 같은 해체정보산출모듈을 개발하였다. 그리고 해체공정을 가상환경에서 구현하여 해체절차를 파악하기 위하여 디지털 목업(Digital Mock-Up, DMU)을 개발하였으며 DMU 시스템은 해체정보산출모듈, 해체 DB 및 해체 시나리오 평가 모듈을 통합적으로 관리하도록 개발되었다. 마지막으로 개발된 해체 DMU 시스템과 계층분석과정 모델을 연구로 1호기(Korea Research Reactor-1, KRR-1) thermal column의 플라즈마 절단 시나리오와 nibbler 절단 시나리오에 적용하여 비교 평가하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jung, K.J. Decommissioning of TRIGA mark 1&2, KAERI/RR-1798/97, 1997
  2. Park, J.H. Decontamination and decommissioning project for the nuclear facilities, KAERI/RR-2304/2002, 2003
  3. Website : http://www.sckcen.be/visiplan
  4. Julia, L.T. Tools for optimal waste and exposure reduction, Waste Management Conference '02, 2002, 1
  5. Vermeersch, F. Saving money and radiological doses: the VISIPLAN tool, NCL04-017, 2004
  6. Iguchi, Y. Development of a decommissioning engineering support system of the FUGEN NPS. 11th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, 2003, 56
  7. Yoon, J.S. Digital mockup for advanced spent fuel conditioning process. Japan-Korea Workshop on Nuclear Pyroprocessing, 2005, 15
  8. Kim, H.R. The preliminary 3D dynamic simulation on the RSR dismantling process of the KRR-1&2. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2003, 30, 1487 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(03)00085-9
  9. Park, H.S. Development of animation and simulation module for evaluation of worker's dose. Waste Management Conference '07, 2007, 156
  10. Vargas, L. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal Operational Research, 1990, 48, 214
  11. Saaty, T.L. The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw- Hill, New York, 1980
  12. Wind, Y.; Saaty, T.L. Marketing applications of the AHP. Management Science, 1980, 26(7), 124
  13. Saaty, T.L. Modelling unstructured decision problems : the theory of analytical hierarchies. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1978, 20, 127
  14. Saaty, T.L. A scaling method for priority in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15, 234 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  15. Saaty, T.L.; Vargas, L.G. The logic of priority : application in business, Energy, Health, and Transportation. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 1982
  16. Saaty, T.L. Highlights and critical points on the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1994, 74, 246
  17. Saaty, T.L. Priority setting in complex problems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1983, 3, 140
  18. Lai, V.S.; Trueblood, R.P.; Wong, B.K. Software Selection: A case study of the application of the analytic hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring system. Information and Management, 1999, 36, 221 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00021-X
  19. Liberatore, M.J.; Stylianou, A.C. Using knowledgebased systems for strategic market assessment. Information and Management, 1994, 27, 221 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(94)90050-7
  20. National Environmental Studies Project, Guidelines for Producing Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates, AIF/NESP-036 Report, Washington 1986