Assesment of Ecological Condition Improvement by Eco-Technological Restoration in a Small Stream

샛강의 생태공학적 복원공법 적용에 따른 생태환경 개선 효과

  • 권태호 (대구대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 이정호 (대구대학교 과학교육학부)
  • Published : 2007.10.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to assess the improved aspects of ecological conditions in a small stream, where eco-technological restorations such as gabion-crib mattress arrangement and soil-arresting wicker fence work had already been made up to stabilize the physically and ecologically damaged streambank. Six metrics by diatoms including species richness, Shannon diversity, saprobic index by DAIpo, percent sensitive diatoms, percent of Achnanthes minutissima, dominant index were analysed to assess the ecological integrity of small stream. By generalizing the changed values of six metrics on the stream flow from upper point(ST.1) to lower point(ST.3), it was found that the effect value of ecological condition improvement went up to as much as 33.9% on the average. The results suggested that eco-technological restoration treatment applied to this study is considerably effective for preserving the ecological integrity of small stream.

본 연구는 샛강 기슭 훼손부의 물리적, 생태적 안정화를 도모하고자 돌망태틀놓기공법 및 버드나무울짱얽기공법을 시공한 구간에서 생태환경 개선 효과를 검증하기 위하여 수행되었다. 샛강의 생태적 건강도 평가를 위해 규조군집의 종풍부도, 종다양도지수, 수질오염도지수, 오염 민감종의 구성비, Achnanthes minutissima의 구성비, 우점도지수의 6개 메트릭을 활용하였다. 구간 상류의 유입부(ST. 1)와 구간 내 지점(ST. 2) 및 하류 유출부(ST. 3)를 대상으로 6개 메트릭의 변화값을 종합하면 평균 33.9%의 높은 생태환경 개선 효과를 확인할 수 있었다. 이 결과는 본 조사에서 적용된 샛강의 생태공학적 안정화기술이 하천의 생태학적 건강도를 보존하는 데 있어 효과적임을 시사해주는 것으로 평가할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 환경부(1996) 수질오염, 폐기물, 토양오염 공정시험방법 환경부고시 제96-32호, 동화기술, 683쪽
  2. 환경부(2002) 하천복원 가이드라인. 환경부 G-7 국내여건에 맞는 자연형 하천공법 개발연구팀(한국건설기술연구원 제공 DB)
  3. Agroecology Issue Team of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture(2001) Agroecology Issue Team Report 2001, 93pp
  4. Asai, K. and T. Watanabe(1995) Statistic classification of epilithic diatom species into three ecological groups relating to organic water pollution(2) Saprophilous and saproxenous taxa. Diatom 10: 35-47
  5. Ganasan, V. and R.M. Hughes(1998) Application of index of biological integrity (IBI) to fish assemblages of the rivers Khan and Kshipra(Madhya Pradesh), India. Freshwater Biology 40(2): 55-59
  6. Harris, J.H. (1995) The use of fish in ecological assessments. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 65-80 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00523.x
  7. Hendey N.I. (1974) The permanganate method for cleaning using diatoms. Nova Hedwigia Bein 64: 305-323
  8. Hocutt, C.H., P.N. Johnson, C. Hay and B.J. VanZyl(1994) Biological basis of water quality assessment: the Kavango River, Namibia. Reviews Hydrobiologie Tropical 27: 361-384
  9. Hugueny, B., S. Camara, B. Samoura and M. Magassouba (1996) Applying an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages in a West African river. Hydrobiologia 331: 71-78 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025409
  10. Kondolf, G.M. and E. R. Micheli(1995) Evaluation stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19(1): 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471999
  11. Oberdorff, T. and R.M. Hughes(1992) Modification of an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages to characterize rivers of the Seine Basin, France, Hydrobiologia 228: 117-130 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006200
  12. Oklahoma Conservation Commision(OCC)(1993) Development of rapid bioassessment protocols for Oklahoma utilizing characteristics of the diatom community. Oklahoma Conservation Commision, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 166pp
  13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(1999) Rapid bio-assessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, (2nd). EPA 842-B-99-002 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C
  14. Watanabe, T. and K. Asai(1990) Numerical simulation using diatom assemblage of organic pollution in stream and lakes. The Review of Inquiry and Research 52: 99-139. The Kansai University of Foreign Studies, Osaka, Japan (in Japanese)