Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biomechanical Comparison of HG(hard ground) Soccer Footwear and SG(soft ground) Soccer Footwear

Hard Ground용 축구화와 Soft Ground용 축구화의 운동역학적 비교

  • Published : 2006.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical difference of two soccer footwear. which will provide scientific data to coaches and players, to further prevent injuries and to improve each players skills. The result of this study can be summarized after testing the two types of soccer footwear with comparative transforming heel angles and also with a pressure distribution in running. When a player's foot first touched the ground, the average difference of in/eversion was between 1.2 and 3.1 degrees for the two soccer shoes. In regards to maximum inversion and eversion of foot, maximum tibial rotation, and maximum and total movement of foot, the condition of barefoot and the two soccer shoes showed a small difference from 1.5 to 3.5 degrees and the difference among the subjects of study wasn't constant. In regards to maximum velocity of inversion and eversion running in one's bare feet showed much lower inversion velocity in comparison to putting on two types of soccer shoes and comparison of the average. Among some of the subjects, after putting on the two types of soccer shoes exceeded $97^{\circ}/s$ in maximum velocity of eversion. In the maximum braking impulse(t=2774, p<.05) and propulsive impulse for antero-posterior direction, there was a statistically significant difference between the two soccer footwear at running. In the maximum braking force(t=3.270, p<.05) and propulsive force(t=4.956, p<.05) for antero-posterior direction, there was a statistically significant difference between the two soccer footwear at running.

Keywords

References

  1. 연합뉴스(2005, 5)
  2. 조선일보(2004, 3)
  3. 이기광(2004). 트레이드밀 달리기시 신발 내부의 부하에 관한 연구. 한국운동역학회지, 제14권 제2호 pp. 105-119
  4. 이중숙(2004). 축구화 스터드의 형태변화에 따른 회전마찰력. 한국운동역학회지. 제14권 제2호. pp.121-138. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2004.14.2.121
  5. Alex Stacoff, A, Reinschmidt, C, Nigg, B..M., van den Bogert, AJ., Lundberg, A., & Stussi, E.(2000). Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clinical Biomechanics 15, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00028-5
  6. Andreasson, G, Lindenberger, U., Renstrom, P., & Peterson, L(1986). Torque developed at simulated sliding between sport shoes and an artificial turf. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 14: 225-230 https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658601400308
  7. Areblad, M, Nigg, BM, Ekstand, J., Olisson, K.O., Ekstrom, H.(1990). Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running. Journal of Biomechanics 23, 933-940, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90358-A
  8. Arendt, E., & Dick, R.(1995). Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegigate basketball and soccer. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 23:694-701 https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659502300611
  9. Bates, B.T., Osterring, L.R,Mason, B.James, S.L.,(1978). Lower extremity function during the support phase of running. In:Asmussen, E., Jorgensen, K.(Eds), Biomechanics VI-B. University Park, Baltimore, pp.30-39.
  10. Cavanagh, P.R, Lafortune, M.A.(1980). Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech, 13:397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90033-0
  11. Holden, J. P., & Cavanagh, P.R.(1991). The free moment of ground reaction in distance running and its changes with pronation J, of Biomechanics. 24(10): 887-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(91)90167-L
  12. Nigg, B.M(1986). Biomechanics of Running Shoes, Human Kinetics Publishers, Illinois, pp.41-61.
  13. Nike Sport Research Review.(1989). Common running injuries, Mar/Apr.
  14. Nigg B.M., Morlock, M.,(1987). The influence of lateral heel flare of running shoes on pronation and impact forces. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 19(3):294-302.
  15. Reinschmidt, C(1996). Three-dimensional tibiocalcaneal and tibiofemoral kinematics during human locomotion-measured with external and bone markers. PhD. Thesis, The University of Calgary
  16. Torg, J. S., Quedenfeld, T. C, & Landau, S. (1974). The effect of ambient temperature on the shoe-surf interface release coefficient. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 24:79-82
  17. Vagenas, G., & HoshizaM, B.(1992). A multivariable analysis of lower extremity kinematic asymmetry in running. Journal of Sports Biomechanics 8, 11-29.