Toxicity of Phenols to the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Caenorhabditis elegans를 이용한 phenol류의 독성 연구

  • Jung Kang-Sik (Department of Hygienic Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hyun Sun-Hee (Department of Hygienic Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choung Se-Young (Department of Hygienic Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University)
  • 정강식 (경희대학교 약학대학 위생화학교실) ;
  • 현선희 (경희대학교 약학대학 위생화학교실) ;
  • 정세영 (경희대학교 약학대학 위생화학교실)
  • Published : 2006.09.01

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans(C. elegans) is a free-living soil nematode that commonly used as a biological model and recently, much work has been done using C. elegans as a toxicity model. To evaluate the acute toxicity of phenols to C. elegans, worms were subsequently exposed to nine different xenobiotics. This study described lethal toxicity, reproductive toxicity and movement inhibition using 2-propylphenol, 4-propylphenol, 2-tert-butylphenol, 3-tert-butylphenol, 4-tert-butylphenol, 2-phenylphenol, 4-phenylphenol, nonylphenol and 4-dodecylphenol to C. elegans for 24 hr or 72 hr. We found that phenols used in this study were very toxic to C. elegans. The order of lethal toxicity, reproductive toxicity and movement inhibition is as follows. 4-propylphenol > 2-phenylphenol > 2-tert-butylphenol > 2-propylphenol > nonylphenol > B-tert-butylphenol > 4-dodefylphenol > 4-tert-butylphenol > 4-phenylphenol.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립환경연구원 환경위해성 연구부, 환경위해성 연구과, 내분비계 장애물질이란?. 국립환경연구원 1998
  2. 신동천. 내분비 장애물질이란?. 한국식품과학회지 1999; 32: 1-17
  3. Dhawan R, Dusenbery DB and Williams PL. Comparison of Lethality, Reproduction, and Behavior as Toxicological Endpoints in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Toxicology and Environmental Health 1999; 58: 451-462 https://doi.org/10.1080/009841099157179
  4. Easton A, Guven K and de Pomerai DI. Toxicity of the Dithiocarbamate Fungicide Mancozeb to the Nontarget Soil Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans J Biochem Molecular Toxicology 2000; 15: 15-25
  5. Emmons SW. Sexual Behavior of the Caenorhabditis elegans Male. Int Rev Neurobiol 2005; 69: 99-123 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(05)69004-6
  6. Hood TE, Calabrese EJ and Zuckerman BM. Detection of an estrogen receptor in two nematode species and inhibition of binding and development by environmental chemicals. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2000; 47: 74-81 https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.2000.1917
  7. Kwack SJ, Kwon O, Kim HS, Kim SS, Kim SH, Sohn KH, Lee RD, Park CH, Jeung EB, An BS and Park KL. Comparative evaluation of alkylphenolic compounds on estrogenic activity in vitro and in vivo. J Toxicol. Environ Health A 2002; 65: 419-431 https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390252808082
  8. Lewis JA and Fleming JT. Basic culture methods. Methods Cell Biol 1995; 48: 3-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61381-3
  9. Realini PA. Determination of priority pollutant phenols in water by HPLC. J Chromatogr Sci 1981; 19: 124-129 https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/19.3.124
  10. Squire MD, Tornoe C, Baylis HA, Fleming JT, Barnard EA and Sattelle DB. Molecular cloning and functional coexpression of a Caenorhabditis elegans nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit (acr-2). Receptors Channels 1995; 3: 107-115
  11. Cincinnatti OH. 'Sampling and Analysis procedures for Screening of Industrial Effluents for Priority Phenols' Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, USEPA 1997
  12. Van Kessel WH, Brocades Zaalberg RW and Seinen W. Testing environmental pollutants on soil organisms a simple assay to investigate the toxicity of environmental pollutants on soil organisms, using $CdCl_2$ and nematodes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1989; 18: 181-190 https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(89)90079-1
  13. Williams C, Xu L and $Bl{\mu}Menthal$ T. SLI trans splicing and 3′-end formation in a novel class of Caenorhabditis elegans operon. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19: 376-383 https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.1.376