DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

코어용 레진의 두께가 중합에 미치는 영향

Influence of Thickness on the Degree of Cure of Composite Resin Core Material

  • 권병철 (경북대학교 치과대학 치의학과 보존학교실) ;
  • 박정원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치의학과 보존학교실)
  • Kwon, Pyoung-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 발행 : 2006.09.01

초록

본 연구는 코어용 이중 중합 레진의 중합도에 미치는 두께의 영향과 빛이 감소된 깊은 와동에서 자가 중합에 의한 영향을 조사하고자 하였다. Luxacore Dual과 Luxacore Self (DMG Inc, Hamburg, Germany) 두 종류의 코어용 레진 수복재를 지름 10 mm, 두께가 2, 4, 6, 8 mm 의 Teflon mold에 주입하고 자가중합 시키거나 혹은 $500 mW/cm^2$의 광도로 제조자의 지시에 따라 중합 후 $37^{\circ}C$ 증류수에 24시간동안 저장하였다. 각 시편의 윗면과 아랫면에서 Knoop's hardness를 측정하였다. 결과는 ANOVA로 통계 분석 하였고 Tukey's test로 사후 검정하였다. Luxacore Self와 Luxacore Dual을 자가중합 시킨 군의 중합도는 두께에 따른 영향을 받지 않았다. Luxacore dual을 광중합한 경우 중합은 2 mm, 4 mm와 6 (적층충전) mm군에서는 밑면의 효과적인 중합이 일어났으나 8 (적층충전) mm군, 6, 8 (단일충전) mm군은 밑면에서 불완전한 중합을 보였다 (p < 0.05). 따라서 이 실험 결과에 의하면 4 mm를 초과하는 경우 단일충전보다 적층충전이 더 좋은 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of thickness on the degree of cure of dual-cured composite core. 2, 4, 6, 8 mm thickness Luxacore Dual and Luxacore Self (DMG Inc, Hamburg, Germany) core composites were cured by bulk or incremental filling with halogen curing unit or self-cure mode The specimens were stored at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours and the Knoop's hardness of top and bottom surfaces were measured. The statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey's test at p = 0.05 significance level. In self cure mode, polymerization is not affected by the thickness. In Luxacore dual, polymerization of the bottom surface was effective in 2, 4 and 6 (incremental) mm specimens. However the 6 (bulk) and 8 (bulk, incremental) mm filling groups showed lower bottom/top hardness ratio (p < 0.05). Within the limitation of this experiment, incremental filling is better than bulk filling in case of over 4 mm depth, and bulk filling should be avoided.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Soh MS, Yap AUJ & Siow KS. Effectiveness of composite cure associated with different curing modes of LED lights. Oper Dent 28:371-377, 2003
  2. Yap AUJ. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent 25:113-120, 2000
  3. Soh MS, Yap AUJ & Siow KS. The Effectiveness of cure of LED and halogen curing lights at varying cavity depths. Oper Dent 28:707-715, 2003
  4. Bala O, Uctasli MB & Tuz MA. Barcoll hardness of different resin-based composites cured by halogen or light emitting diode (LED). Oper Dent 30:69-74, 2005
  5. Pilo R & Cardash HS. Post-irradiation polymerization of different anterior and posterior visible light-activated resin composites. Dent Mater 8:299-304, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90104-K
  6. Sharp LJ, Yin R, Kang WH & Suh BI. Comparison of curing of resin cements. J Dent Res Abst. # 1847, 2005
  7. Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 90:484-489, 1982
  8. Laiza T Poskus, Elinane Placido & Paulo E Capel Cardoso. Influence of placement techniques on vickers and knoop hardness of class II composite resin restorations. Dent Mater 20:726-732, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.006
  9. Jandt KD, Mills RW, Blackwell GB & Ashworth SH. Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs). Dent Mater 16:41-47, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00083-4
  10. Dewald JP & Ferracane JL. A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 66:727-730, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660030401
  11. Bayne SC, Heymann HO & Swift EJ Jr. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 125: 687-701, 1994 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0113
  12. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-colored alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 25:459-473, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00066-8
  13. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF & Curtis JW Jr. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 19:26-32, 1994
  14. Rueggeberg FA & Jordan DM. Effect of light-tip distance on polymerization of resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 6:364-370, 1993
  15. Ruyter IE & oysaed H. Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials. Acta Odontol Scand 40:179-192, 1982 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358209012726
  16. Yearn JA. Factors affecting cure of visible light activated composites. Int Dent J 35:218-225, 1985
  17. Watts DC, Amer O & Combe EC. Characteristics of visible light-activated composite systems. Br Dent J 156:209-215, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805312
  18. Lovell LG, Newman SM & Bowman CN. The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer composition on the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins. J Dent Res 78:1469-1476, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780081301

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of curing modes on micro-hardness of dual-cure resin cements vol.36, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.2.132