과학기술분야의 연구성과물정보 표준 메타데이터 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on the Development of Metadata Standard for Research Outcomes Information in Science & Technology

  • 박동진 (공주대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Park, Dong-Jin (Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Kongju National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.12.31

초록

It has lately been difficult to share the research outcomes information due to the information system not being compatible with one another. To solve this problem, it is believed that a meta data standard needs to be developed for all the institutions to follow. This paper shows how to make the research outcome of Science and Technology R&D project a standard metadata. We first classified all the research outcome into the following seven groups: Report, Journal article, Presentation material, Book, Dissertation, Industrial rights, and Technology development. We then identified three components that constitute a standard metadata. We employed the Dublin Core Metadata Set and CERIF(Common European Research Information Format) for worldwide interoperability. This Standard can be applied in the following areas: 1) Developing a standard architecture to manage research result within the organization. 2) Designing a conceptual/logical database to measure and evaluate the research outcome. 3) Developing a metadata system for research outcome as a subsystem of an Industrial Technology MDR (Metadata Registry) System.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고영만, '메타데이터 표준화와 메타데이터 레지스트리', 국회도서관, 국회도서관보, 42(11) : 18-26, 2005
  2. 과학기술부; 국가 R&D 성과활용 관련 설문조사, 2005
  3. 과학기술통합검색, www.yeskisti.net, 2006
  4. 김미영; '회색문헌의 생산현황과 관리-부산대학교내 37 연구소를 중심으로', 석사학위논문, 부산대학교, 2002
  5. 남영준; '디지털 시대의 회색문헌 이용 활성화에 관한 연구', 한국정보관리학회지, 19(4) : 234-255, 2002 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2002.19.4.234
  6. Almeida, Mario do G.G.; 'Control Access for Grey Literature in Brazil: A Proposal,' In fourth Internalanoit Conference on Grey Literature, 1999
  7. Auger, C. P.; Information Sources in Grey Literature,4th ed. London, 1996
  8. Chen, H. and Chen, C.; 'Metadata Development for digital Libraries and Museums-Taiwan's Experience,' DC-2001, NII, Tokyo, 2001
  9. CRIS; CERIF(Common European Research Information Format) http://www.eurocris.org/en/taskgroups/cerif, 2004
  10. Dublin Core Metadata Intiative; http://dublincore.org, 2005
  11. Jeffery; K.; 'An Architecture for Grey Literature in a R&D,' In fourth International Conference on Grey Literature, 1999
  12. Knapp, M., Dexter, S., and McLaughlin, R.; 'Metadata Co-Development: A Process Resulting in Metadata about Technical Assistance to Educators,' Proceedings of the 13th International WWW Conference, 2004
  13. Lightle, K.; 'Using Metadata Standards to Support Interoperability,' in CM Gynn & SR Acker (eds.), Learning Objects: Contexts and Connections, pp. 43-48, 2003
  14. Matthews, B., Wilson, M., and Kleese-van Dam, K., 'Accessing the Outputs of Science Project,' Proceedings, 6th International Conference on CRIS, 2002
  15. Miller, E.; 'An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework,' http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may98/miller/05miller.html, 1998
  16. Mooney S.; 'Interoperability,' D-Lib Magazine,Jan. 2001
  17. Steinacker A., Ghavam A., and Steinmetzm R.; 'Metadata Standards for Web-Based Resource,' IEEE Multimedia, 8(1) : 70-76, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1109/93.923956
  18. Xie, R. and Shibaski R.; 'Standardization Framework for CEOP Metadata Development and Application,' CEOP/IGWCO Joint Meeting, University of Tokyo, 2005