Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (한국수산과학회지)

The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science (한국수산과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reproductive Biology of Neocaridina denticulata denticulata and Latreutes planirostris

새뱅이와 넓적뿔꼬마새우의 생식생물학적 연구

  • Jeong In-Ju (Department of Oceanography, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh Chul-Woong (Department of Marine Fisheries Resources, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Ma Chae-Woo (Division of Life Sciences, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 정인주 (전남대학교 해양학과) ;
  • 오철웅 (목포대학교 해양수산자원학과) ;
  • 마채우 (순천향대학교 생명과학부)
  • Published : 2006.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We investigated the fecundity, egg size, reproductive output, and breeding frequency and season of Neocaridina denticulata denticulata and Latreutes planirostris which inhabit extremely different habitats. The marine shrimp Latreutes planirostris produced more eggs had at a given carapace length than the freshwater shrimp N. d. denticulata. However, N. d. denticulata had a larger egg volume and greater reproductive output than L. planirostris. The monthly gonadosomatic index (GSI) of the freshwater shrimp began to increase in April and reached a maximum in May, suggesting a single breeding period. In contrast, the GSI of the marine shrimp exhibited two breeding peaks: May-June and September. In both shrimps, the regressions between carapace length and ovarian weight were significant at the non-eyed and eyed embryo stages. For both species, an analysis of covariance revealed significant difference between the two regressions in elevation, but not in slope. These results indicate the potential for multiple ovulations within the reproductive season.

Keywords

References

  1. Anger, K. and G.S. Moreira. 1998. Morphometric and reproductive traits of tropical caridian shrimps. J.Crust. Biol., 18, 823-838. https://doi.org/10.1163/193724098X00674
  2. Bames, H. and H. Bames 1965. Egg size, nauplius size, and their variation with local, geographical, and specific factors in some common cirripes. J. Ani. Ecol., 34, 390-402.
  3. Clarke, A. 1979. On living in cold water: K-strategies in Antarctic benthos. benthos. Mar. Biol., 55, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397306
  4. Clarke, A. 1987. Temperature, latitude and reproductive effort. Mar. Ecol Prog. Ser., 38, 89-99 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps038089
  5. Clarke, A.C., C.E. Hopkins and E.M. Nilssen. 1991. Egg size and reproductive output in the deep water prawn Pandalus borealis Krøyer, 1838. Func. Ecol., 5, 724-730. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389534
  6. Cole, H.A. 1958. Notes on the biology of the common prawn Palaemon serratus (Pennant). Fish. Invest. (Series II). 22, 1-22.
  7. Grant, A. 1990. Mode of development and reproductive effort in marine invertbrates: should there be any relationship? Func. Ecol., 4, 128-130.
  8. Guerao, G., P.J. Perez-Baquera and C. Ribera. 1994. Growth and reproductive biology of Palaemon xiphias Risso, 1816 (Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae). J. Crust. Biol., 14, 280-288. https://doi.org/10.2307/1548908
  9. Hartnoll, R.G. 1982. Growth. In: The Biology of Crustacea. Embryology, morphology and genetics, Vol. 2, L.G. Abele, ed. Academic Press, N ew York, 111-185.
  10. Hartnoll, R.G. 1985. Growth, sexual maturity and reproductive output. In: A.M. Wenner, ed., Factors in Adult Growth. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Boston. 101-128.
  11. Hines, A.H. 1982. Allometric constraints and variables of reproductive effort in brachyuran crabs. Mar. Biol., 69, 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397496
  12. Holthuis, L. B. 1980. F AO species catalogue. Vol. 1: Shrimp and prawns of the world. An annotated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fisheries Synopsis. 125, 1-271.
  13. Kamita T. 1958. Ecological notes on the freshwater shrimps and prawns of Japan ㅅⅥ. On the shrimp, Paratya compressa (De Haan). Zool. Mag., Zool. Soc. Jap., 67, 237-241.
  14. Kim, H.S., 1977. Illustrated Flora and Fauna of Korea. Ministry of Education, Korea, 1-414.
  15. King, M.G. and Butler, A.J. 1985. Relationship of life-his.tory patterns to depth in deep-water caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Natantia). Mar. Biol., 86, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399018
  16. Lardies, M.A. and I.S. Wehrtmann. 1997. Egg production in Betaeus emarginatus (H. Miline Edwards, 1837) (Decapoda: Alpheidae): Fecundity, reproductive output and chemical composition of eggs. Ophelia, 46,165-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1997.10432582
  17. Mashiko, K. 1990. Diversified egg and clutch sizes among local populations of the fresh-water prawn Macrobrachium nipponense (De Haan). J. Crust. Biol., 10,306-314.
  18. Mashiko, K. 1992. Genetic egg and clutch size variations in freshwater prawn populations. Oikos, 63, 454-458. https://doi.org/10.2307/1548489
  19. Oh, C.W. and R.G. Hartnoll. 1999. Size at sexual maturity, reproductive output and seasonal reproduction of Philocheras trispinosus (Hailstone, 1835) (Crustacea: Decapoda) on Port Erin Bay, Isle of Man. J. Crust. Biol., 19, 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1163/193724099X00051
  20. Oh, C.W. and K.Y. Park. 2000. Comparative study on reproductive effort and spawning frequency of the two palaemonid prawns(Exopalaemon modestus and Palaemon gravieri) with different habitats. J. Fish.Sci. Tech., 3, 180-187.
  21. Pillay, K.K. and N.B. Nair. 1971. The annual reproductive cycles of Uca annulipes ， Portunus pelagicus and Metapenaeus affinis (Decapada: Crustacea) from the south-west coast of lndia. Mar. Biol., 11 , 152-166.
  22. Strathmann, R.R. 1985. Feeding and unfeeding larval development and life-history evolution in marine invertebrates. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16, 339-361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.16.1.339
  23. Thorson, G. 1950. Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Bio. Rev., 25, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1950.tb00585.x
  24. Vance, R.R. 1973. On reproductive strategies in marine benthic invertebrates. Ame. Nat., 107, 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1086/282839
  25. Wear, R.G. 1974. lncubation in British decapod crustacea, and the effects of temperature on the rate and success of embryonic development. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K.,54, 745-762. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400022918
  26. Willows, R.l. 1990. Mode of development and reproductive effort in marine invertbrates: no relationship predicted by life-history theory? Func. Ecol., 4, 130-132.
  27. Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc.,Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1-663.