대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제44권3호
  • /
  • Pages.325-332
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

EFFECT OF IMPLANT DESIGNS ON INSERTION TORQUE AND IMPLANT STABILITY QUOTIENT (ISQ) VALUE

  • Piao Chun-Mei (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koak Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Seong-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han Chong-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Fang Xian-Hao (Department of Stomatology, College of Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. Primary implant stability has long been identified as a prerequisite to achieve osseointegration. So the application of a simple, clinically applicable noninvasive test to assess implant stability and osseiointegratation are considered highly desirable. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ISQ value and the insertion torque of the 3 different implant system, then to evaluate whether there was a correlation between ISQ value and insertion torque; and to determine whether implant design has an influence on either insertion torque or ISQ value. Material and method. The experiment was composed of 3 groups: depending on the implant fixture design. Group1 was Branemark type parallel implant in $3.75{\times}7mm$. Group2 was Oneplant type straight implant in $4.3{\times}8.5mm$. Group3 was Oneplant type tapered implant in $4.3{\times}8.5mm$. Depending on the density of the bone, 2 types of bone were used in this experiment. Type I bone represented for cortical bone, type II bone represented for cancellous bone. With the insertion of the implant in type I and type II bone, the insertion torque was measured, then the ISQ value was evaluated, and then the correlation between insertion torque and ISQ value was analyzed Result and conclusion. Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions were drawn. 1. Within the 3 different implants, the insertion torque value and ISQ value were higher in type I bone, when compared with type II bone.(p<0.05) 2. In type I and type II bone, Oneplant type tapered implant has the highest value in insertion torque.(p<0.05) 3. In type I and type II bone, there was no difference in ISQ values among the 3 types of implant. (p>0.05) 4. Significant linear correlation was found in $Br{\aa}nemark$ type parallel implant: $3.75{\times}7mm$ in type II bone.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chiapasco M, Gatti C, Rossi E, Haefliger W, Markwalder TH. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading. A retrospective multicenter study on 226 consecutive cases. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:48-57 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00007.x
  2. lazzara RJ, Porter SS, Testori T, Galante J, Zetterquist LA. A prospective multicenter study evaluating loading of Osseotite implants two months after placement. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:180-9
  3. Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama S, Reingewirta Y, DubruiIIe JH. Timing of loading and effect of micro-motion on bone-iamplant interface. J Biomed mater Res (Applied Biomaterials) 1998;43:192-203 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<192::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K
  4. Szmukler-MoncIer S, PiatteIIi A, Favero JA, Dubruills ]H. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in implant dentistry. CIin Oral Implant Res 2000 Feb;11(1):II:12-25
  5. Jaffin RA, Kumar A, Berman CL. Immediate loading of implants in partially and fully edentulous jaws: a series of 27 case reports. J Periodontol 2000;71:833-38 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.5.833
  6. Glauser R, Ree A. Gottlow J, Hammerle CH, Scharer P. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: a prospective, '1-year clinical study. CIin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:204-13 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00142.x
  7. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:572-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120604.x
  8. Cochran DL, Buser D, Brugenakte C, Wiengart D, Taylor T, Bernard JP, Simpson JP, Peters F. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trails on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:144-53 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  9. Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Feldman 5, Vincenzi G, O' sullivan D, Rossi RJ, Anitua E, Bianchi F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. A multicenter prospective evaluation of a 2-months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3-year followup results. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:154-61 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130205.x
  10. Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading implants. Cochrance Database Syste Rev 2003;1:CD003878
  11. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branernark, A 15-year study of osseointegtated implants in the treatment of the edentulous saw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  12. Albrektsson T, Branemark P, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone to implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  13. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinanat. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501
  14. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Surg 1999a;28:266-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8
  15. Ostman P O, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance Frequency Analysis Measurements of Implants at Placement Surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:77-83
  16. Gapski R, Wang H L, Mascarenhas P, Lang N P. Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:515-27 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00950.x
  17. Meredith N. A review of nondestructive test methods and their application to measure the stability and osseiontegration of bone anchored end osseous implants. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1998;26:275-91 https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v26.i4.20
  18. Meredith N, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997a;8:226-333 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  19. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Imp Res 1997b;8:234-43 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  20. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:261-7 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  21. Cunha H A, Francischone E, Filho HN, Candido R, Oliverira G. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and tiunite single-tooth implants under immediate loading. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:578-85
  22. Johansson P, Strid KG. Assessment of bone quality from placement resistance during implant surgery. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:279-88
  23. O' sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implant a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 200;2(2):85-92 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x
  24. O' sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and second stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:474-80 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01041.x
  25. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericsson L. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;6:62-71