대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제44권3호
  • /
  • Pages.314-324
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

A STUDY ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN IMPLANT STABILITY VALUES AND INITIAL INSERTION TORQUE

  • Lee Jong-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang Jae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. Osseointegration is important mechanism of dental implant but it is not easy to evaluate. Indirect measurement is non-invasive and clinically applicable but they need more study about correlation between indirect values and degree of osseointegration. Purpose. The aims of this study were to evaluate the coefficient of correlation between indirect measurement and direct measurement under different healing time, and assessment of effect of initial insertion torque to the implant stability. Material and Methods. 20 rabbits received 3 implants on each side of tibia. Three kinds of implants (machined surface implant, Sandblasted with Large grit and Acid etched implant, Resorbable Blast Media treated implant) were used. During the surgery implant insertion torque were measured with $Osseocare^{TM}$. After the 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks of healing time, animals were sacrificed and stability values (Implant Stability Quotient with $Osstell^{TM}$, removal torque with torque gauge) were measured. Results. The Bone quality of rabbit tibia was classified into 2 groups according to the insertion torque. Resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) and removal torque showed positive correlation until $4^{th}$ week (r=0.555, p=0.040). After $8^{th}$ week (r=0.011, p=0.970) the correlation became weak and it turned negative at $12^{th}$ week (r=-0.074, p=0.801). Insertion torque and ISQ showed changing correlation upon the healing time ($1^{st}$ week: r=0.301, p=0.033, $4^{th}$ week: r=-0.429, p=0.018, $8^{th}$ week: r=0.032, p=0.865, $12^{th}$ week: r=-0.398, p=0.029). Insertion torque and removal torque has positive correlation but it was not statistically significant ($1^{st}$ week: r=0.410, p=0.129, $4^{th}$ week: r=0.156, p=0.578, $8^{th}$ week: r=0.236, p=0.398, $12^{th}$ week: r=0.260, p=0.350). Conclusion. In this study, bone quality may affect the degree of osseointegration positively during healing time and correlation between ISQ and degree of osseointegration can be different according to the healing time and bone quality.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The impact of oral implants-past and future, 1966-2024. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71;327
  2. Branemark PI. Introduction to Osseointegration. In: Branernark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T editors. Tissue integrated prosthesis: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p.11-76
  3. Zarb G, Albreksson T. Osseointegration: A requiem for the periodontal ligament? Guest editorial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991;11:88-91
  4. Adell R. The surgical principles of osseointegration. In: Worthington P, Branemark PI editors. Advanced osseointegration surgery: Applications in the maxillofacial region. Carol Stream: Quintessence;1992. p.94-107
  5. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. Direct bone anchorage of oral implants: Clinical and experimental considerations of the concept of osseointegration. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:30-41
  6. Yi YA, Cha IH, Lee HY, Han DH. The influencing factors of periotest value and implant stability quotient. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:40-50
  7. Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Collins T A, Krogh PH. The reverse-torque test: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:179-85
  8. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of implant-tissue interlace using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996:7;261-7 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  9. Meredith N. Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997:8;226-33 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  10. Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit. A 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:69-75
  11. Lee JS, Kim YS, Kim CW. A study on the removal torque of titanium implants. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1994;32:148-169
  12. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998:11;491-501
  13. Becker W, Sennerby L, Bedrossian E, Becker BE, Lucchini JP. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: A cohort, prospective clinical trial. J Periodontol 2005;76:391-7 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.391
  14. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants: A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:297-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80163-5
  15. Park C, Lim JH, Cho IH, Lim HS. A study on the measurement of the implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:182-206
  16. Kim SJ, Shin SW, Jung SM, Ryu JJ. A study on the stability of 5 different surface treatment methods to dental implant using resonance frequency and histomorphometric analysis. J Korean Acad prosthodont 2005;43:78-94
  17. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixture in type IV bone 5-year analysis. J Periodont 1991;62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  18. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallis T. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:129-134
  19. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, Gunsolley J. A multi-center study comparing dual add-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol 2001;72:1384-90 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1384
  20. Iezzi G, Degidi M, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. Bone response to submerged, unloaded implants inserted in poor bone sites: A histological and histomorphometrical study of 8 titanium implants retrieved from man. J Oral Implantol 2005;31:225-33 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[225:BRTSUI]2.0.CO;2
  21. Trisi P, Rao W, Rebaudi A. A histometric comparison of smooth and rough titanium implants in human low-density jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:689-98
  22. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue integrated prosthesis: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1985. p. 199-209
  23. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:597-607 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
  24. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Metal selection and surface characteristics. In: Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue integrated prosthesis: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1985. p. 99-116
  25. Johansson P, Strid CG. Assessment of bone quality form cutting resistance during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1994;9:279-88
  26. Neugebauer J, Traini T, Thams U, Piattelli A, Zoller JE. Peri-implant bone organization under im- mediate loading state. Circularly polarized light analyses: a minipig study. J Periodontol 2006;77:152-60 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.040360