Correlates of Subjective Well-being in Korean Culture

한국문화에서 주관안녕에 영향을 미치는 사회심리 요인들

  • 한덕웅 (성균관대학교 심리학과)
  • Published : 2006.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to review the results of the subjective well-being(swb) studies performed by Hahn and coworkers in Korean culture. As the correlates of swb, we dealt with demographic/individual difference variables, intrapersonal variables, interpersonal process variables, and Korean cultural variables. We proposed that the components of swb were consisted of quality of life(cognitive swb) and overall happy feelings about one's own life(emotional swb). It was also assumed that a measure of total swb could be calculated by summated mean of cognitive swb and emotional swb measures. The data of the swb studies were analyzed and interpreted according to the above three measures of swb. The results of a nationwide survey(Hahn, 2004) from age of 19 to 75 years ald(n=2,230) showed significant simple correlation coefficients between the following demographic/individual difference variables and swb: Gender difference in swb was found(total swb r=.08, p<.001; life satisfaction r=.10, p<.001; overall emotional swb r=.05, p<.05). Men were happier than women in terms of all three measures of swb. It was also found that women appeared to experience greater positive and negative emotions. Correlation between age and emotional swb(r=.09, p<.001) was significant, but life satisfaction was not significant(r=.04, n.s). Correlations between economic status and swb were also significant(total swb r =.23, p<.001; life satisfaction r=.15 p<.001; overall emotional swb r=.15, p<.001l). Although existence of father was negatively related to emotional swb(r=-.05, p<.05), the existence of mother was not related to any of swb measures. Similarly existence of brothers was related positively to overall emotional swb, but existence of sisters was not. Though existence of son was not related to swb, daughter contributed negatively to swb(total swb -.12, p<.01; life satisfaction -.09, p<.05; emotional swb r=-.12, p<.01). We assumed that family member-in-Iaw also contributed to swb because the extended dose social networks were important in Korean culture. The results showed that the following family member-in-law variables were related to swb: Parents-in-law(total swb r=.11, p<.01; life satisfaction r=.10, p<.01; emotional swb r=.10, p<.01), father-in-law(total swb r=.11, p<.01; life satisfaction r=.11, p<.01; emotional swb r=.06, n.s). The result suggested that especially father-in-law contributed to swb through financial and social support. Correlations between emotional experiences in everyday life and swb were also presented. The range of correlation coefficients between the positive emotion measures and swb were r=.30~.48(p<.001) when the above two measures obtained at same time. But the range decreased to r=.19~32(p<.001) when the swb measure was obtained 9 month later longitudinally. Intercorrelations between positive emotional experience; and life satisfaction were r=.37~58(p<.001) when two measures were obtained at same time. We also examined the effects of the intrapersonal cognitive responses to the most stressful life event upon swb. The results of nationwide survey(n=1,021) showed that self-disclosure(total swb r=.09, p<.010; life satisfaction r=.10, p<.01; emotional swb r=.07, p<.01), rumination(total swb r=-.17, p<.001), thought avoidance(total swb r=.12, p<.001; life satisfaction r=-.08; emotional swb r=-.12, p<.001) and suppression(total swb r=-.13, p<.001; life satisfaction r=-.08, p<.05: emotional swb r=-.13, p<.001) contributed to swb. It was also suggested that mismatch between self-guide and regulatory focus contributed negatively to emotional swb. It was also found that social comparison motives and fulfillment of the motives contributed to swb. The results of a survey research(n=363 college students) revealed that the higher the general social comparison motive, the lower the swb(total swb r=-.15, P<.01: life satisfaction r=-.17. p<.01; emotional swb r=-.10, p<.05). It was also found that satisfaction level of self-evalution motive contributed positively to swb(total swb r=-.14. p<.01: life satisfaction r=-.12, p<.05; emotional swb r=.15, p<.001). Both of self-improvement motive(r=.13, p<.05) and satisfaction level of self-improvement motive(r=.12, p<.05) contributed positively to emotional swb, respectively. The above results suggested that swb was depended upon the interaction effect of social comparison motive; and level of fulfillment of the motives. We also reported the significant multiple predictors of swb in a sample of age from 60years to 89years olds. The results of multiple regression analysis showed that the significant multiple predictors of swb were past illness(β=.174, p<.001), economic status(β=.418, p<.001), marital satisfaction(β=.0841, p<.001), satisfaction of offsprins(β=.065, p<.01), expectation level of social support from offsprings(β=-.049, p<.001), and negative emotions(β=-.454. p<.001) among 16 social psychological factors. It was also found that swb was an important multiple predictors of physical health. This finding was replicated in a longitudinal study. Both of positive and negative emotional experiences were significant multiple predictors of physical health one year later. The results of the discriminant analysis showed both of total swb and positive emotional experiences contributed to discriminate the happy and healthy olds from unhappy and unhealthy olds. We paper also examined the effects of the nonnative social behaviors upon swb in Korean culture. The main hypotheses of the study(Hahn, 2006, in press) was that the important nonnative behaviors would influence on swb through both of the mediation processes of adjustment to social relationships and psychological stress. The survey data were collected from 2,129 adults age of 19 to 75, from 7 regional areas in Korea. The results of the study revealed that almost all of correlation coefficients between 15 normative social behaviors and the above three criteria w-ere significant. The fitness test results of the covariance structural equation model showed that all of the fitness indices were satisfactory (GFI=.974, AGFI=.909, NNFI=.922, NFI=.973, CFI=.974. RMR=.049, RMSEA=.073). The results of the analysis revealed that the following five path coeffi6ents from behaviors to social adjustment were significant; behavior tor family and family members(t=5.87, p<.001), courteous behavior(t=4.39, p<.001), faithful behavior (t=2.15. p<.05). collectivistic behavior(t=8.31, p<.001). Seven path coefficients from the normative behaviors to psychological stress were significant; behavior for family and family members (t=-4.63, p<.001), faithful behavior(t=-3.86, p<.001). suppression of emotional expression(t=3.99, p<.001), trustworthy and dependable behavior(t=-2.21, p<.05), collectivistic behavior(t=3.72, p<.001), effortful and diligent behavior(t=2.94, p<.001), husbandry and saving behavior(t=3.40, p<.001). The above results suggested that four normative behaviors among seven behaviors contributed negatively to psychological stress in current Korean society. The results abo confirmed the hypothesized paths from social adjustment (t=10.40, p<.001) to swb and from psychological stress(t=-19.74, p<.001) to swb. The important results of the study were discussed in terms of the Confucian traditions and recent social changes in Korean culture. Finally limitations of this review paper were discussed and the suggestions for the future study were also proposed.

필자와 공동연구자들(2002)이 선행연구에서 개발한 주관안녕척도를 사용하여 한국문화에서 주관안녕에 영향을 미치는 변인들을 알아낸 연구 결과들을 개관하고, 국내외 연구들과 비교하여 시사점을 논의하고, 장래 연구할 과제들도 제안하였다. 먼저 주관안녕에 영향을 미치는 선행요인들로 ① 개인차와 인구통계 변인들, ② 개인과정 요인들, ③ 대인과정 요인들 및 ④ 한국문화의 요인으로 사회규범에 따른 행동을 다룬 연구 결과들을 개관했다. 또한 노인을 대상으로 주관안녕이 동시점에서 신체건강의 예측에 기여하는 수준과 아울러 1년 이상이 경과한 시점에서 종단적으로 신체건강이나 생사에 어떤 영향을 미치는지도 알아냈다. 본 논문은 한국문화에서 필자와 공동연구자들이 수행한 실증연구의 결과들과 연결시켜서 주관안녕을 연구하는데 따르는 이론, 방법 및 과제들을 구체적으로 논의함으로써 장차 문화비교 연구와 아울러 국내 연구에 시사점들을 제시한데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강혜자, 한덕웅 (2005). 자기차이에 따른 우울과 불안의 경험. 한국심리학회: 건강, 10(3) , 349-374.
  2. 김교헌 (1991). 친교 관계에서 자기노출의 기능 한국심리학회지: 임상, 10(1), 137-158.
  3. 김교헌, 한덕웅 (1996). 자기노출의 목표, 자발성 및 분노억제경향이 생리적 각성, 정화 및 평가에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 1(1), 66-88.
  4. 나영심, 한덕웅 (2005). 자기지침과 조절초점의 불일치가 자기정서에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(4), 431-453.
  5. 박군석, 한덕웅, 이주일 (2004). 한국노인의 신체건강과 주관안녕에 영향을 미치는 요인들. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(2) 441-470.
  6. 박군석, 한덕웅, 이주일 (2005a). 건강하고 행복 한 노인들의 사회심리학적 특징. 2005년 제1차 한국건강심리학회 학술대회 논문집, 156-173.
  7. 박군석, 한덕웅, 이주일 (2005b). 한국 노인의 생과 사에 기여하는 요인. 한국건강심리학회. 2005년 제 4차 학술대회 논문집, 11-18.
  8. 이희란, 한덕웅 (2005). 실패의 경험 후 상향비교의 목표설정이 자기평가에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19 (3),55-81.
  9. 장은영, 한덕웅 (2004). 사회비교의 목표, 대상 및 결과에 따른 자기정서의 경험. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(3), 127-153.
  10. 조긍호 (2003). 한국인 이해의 개념틀. 나남출판.
  11. 차재호 (1983/1994). 국민성 활성화 시안: 시안의 심리학적 접근. 한국정신문화연구원(편), 한국인의 윤리관(319-382쪽). 한국정신문화연구원.
  12. 차재호 (1994). 한국문화의 분석. 문화설계의 심리학(119-153쪽). 서울: 서울대학교 출판부.
  13. 최상진 (2000). 한국인 심리학. 서울 중앙대학교 출판부.
  14. 한덕웅 (1994). 퇴계심리학: 성격 및 사회심리학적 접근 서울: 성균관대학교 출판부.
  15. 한덕웅 (1999). 사회비교의 목표와 성공/실패 경험에 따른 비교 대상의 선택. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13(2), 311-329.
  16. 한덕웅 (2002). 한국문화는 유교에서 어떤 영향을 받았는가. 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 학술발표논문집, 254-260.
  17. 한덕웅 (2003a). 한국유학심리학. 시그마프레스.
  18. 한덕웅 (2003b). 4단7정의 경험이 주관안녕, 건강지각 및 신체건강지각에 미치는 영향. 2003년 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 논문집. 310-311.
  19. 한덕웅 (2004). 한국인의 중요한 가치. 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 발표논문집.
  20. 한덕웅 (2005). 한국문화에서 관습화된 사회행동이 주관안녕에 미치는 영향. 2005 학술대회 논문집 및 정기총회 자료집 17-26.
  21. 한덕웅 (2006). 한국문화에서 사회규범에 따른 행동들이 주관안녕에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 11(2), 363-387.
  22. 한덕웅, 박준호 (2003). 스트레스 사건에 관한 반복생각과 분노경험이 주관안녕과 건강지각에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(1), 147-168.
  23. 한덕웅, 박준호 (2005). 스트레스 사건에 관한 생각억제와 자기노출이 행복과 건강에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(2),183-209.
  24. 한덕웅, 박준호, 김교헌 (2004). 스트레스 사건에 관한 자기노출, 반복생각 및 정서경험이 신체건강에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(1), 99-130.
  25. 한덕웅, 장은영 (2001). 내집단과 개인의 수행 환류가 자기평가에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), 167-183.
  26. 한덕웅, 장은영 (2003a). 사회비교 동기와 강요된 사회비교가 주관안녕과 건강지각에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(3), 619-644.
  27. 한덕웅, 장은영 (2003b). 사회비교가 분노경험, 주관안녕 및 건강지각에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(1), 85-112.
  28. 한덕웅, 표승연 (2002) 정서경험에 따른 주관 안녕, 건강지각 및 신체질병의 예측. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 7(3), 403-427.
  29. 한창수 (2005). 한국 노인의 우울증상과 행복. 2005 사회문제심리학회 학술대회논문집 47-60.
  30. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.
  31. Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions . N.Y.: Guildford Press.
  32. Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
  33. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of Human concerns New Brunswik, N.J.: Rutgers university Press.
  34. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Subjective emotional well-being. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones(Eds.). Handbook of emotion(2nd Ed. Chap. 21, 325-336). N.Y.: The Guilford Press.
  35. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and Happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh(Eds.). Culture and Subjective well-being(pp. 185-218). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  36. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, Massachusetts; The MIT Press.
  37. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125 (2), 276-302.
  38. Lawton, M. (1987). Lauton's PGC morale scale Polisher Research Institute, Philadelpia Geriatric Center.
  39. Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. L. (2000). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh(Eds.). Culture and Subjective well-being(pp. 291-317). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  40. Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333-1349.
  41. Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Gender differences in emotion. In B. M. Clinchy., & J. K. Norem(Eds.), The gender and psychology reader(pp. 236-264). N.Y.: New York University Press.
  42. NG, S. G., Woo, J., Kwan, A., Chong, A., & Lai, S. (2005). Positive Ageing: What is it and why do some people age well? 사회문제심리학회 학술대회 논문집, 27-45.
  43. Okma, P., & Veenhoven, R (2001). Is a longer life a better life? Happiness of the very old in 8 EU-conuntries. Sociale Wetenschappen, 43.
  44. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. Zanna(Ed.), Advances in experimental Social Psychology(Vol. 30, 1-46). N. Y.: Academic Press.
  45. Shin, D. C., Ahn C. S., Kim, K. D., & Lee, H. K. (1983). Environmental effects on perceptions of life quality in Korea. Social Indications Research, 12, 393-416.
  46. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contests. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506-520
  47. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
  48. Williamson, G. M. (2002). Aging well: Outlook for the 21st century. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez(Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology (pp.63-73). N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
  49. Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294-306.