KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggestion of Slope Evaluation by DEM-based Aggregation Method

DEM 기반 조합방법에 의한 경사도 평가기법의 제안

  • 이근상 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구원 수자원환경연구소) ;
  • 최연웅 (전북대학교 공업기술센터) ;
  • 조기성 (전북대학교 공과대학 토목공학과, 공업기술연구센터)
  • Received : 2006.07.14
  • Accepted : 2006.09.21
  • Published : 2006.11.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The slope information based on DEM is very useful for urban planning, landscape, road design and water resource areas such as rainfall-runoff and soil erosion estimation. The resolution of slope, which is from DEM, can be variously decided by an application fields and the kinds of modeling method. In particular, the more decreased resolution makes the more decreased slope value because of the increased horizontal distance. This study presents slope evaluation method by aggregation method based on discharge and Manning's velocity equation to advance the loss of slope information in according to the resolution, and then applied it to calculate topographic factors of soil erosion model. As a result, conventional method shows 34.8% errors but aggregation method shows 12.6% errors. This study selected up-, middle-, and downstream region in watershed and analyzed the capability of aggregation method in order to estimate the influence of topographic characteristics. As a result of estimation, aggregation method shows more advanced results than conventional method. Therefore, the slope evaluation method by aggregation method can improve efficiently the loss of slope information in according to the variation of resolution in water resource area such as rainfall-runoff model.

DEM에 기초한 경사정보는 도시계획, 조경, 도로설계분야는 물론 강우유출 및 토사유실평가와 같은 수자원분야에서도 매우 유용하게 활용된다. DEM에서 추출한 경사도의 해상도는 응용분야 및 모델링의 종류에 따라 다양하게 결정될 수 있으며, 특히 해상도가 낮아질수록 수평거리가 증가하기 때문에 경사도는 감소하는 특징을 갖는다. 본 연구에서는 해상도에 따른 경사정보의 손실을 개선하고자 유량공식과 Manning의 유속공식을 조합한 경사도 평가기법을 제안하였으며, 토사유실모델의 지형인자를 계산하는데 활용하였다. 적용결과 기존의 경사도 평가기법을 이용한 지형인자는 34.8%의 오차를 나타낸 반면, 조합방법에 의한 경사도를 활용한 경우에는 12.6%로 비교적 낮은 오차특성을 확보할 수 있었다. 또한 지형특성에 따른 영향을 평가하기 위해, 유역내 상 중 하류 지역을 선정하여 조합방법에 의한 효용성을 평가한 결과, 조합방법이 기존방법에 비해 개선된 결과를 보였다. 따라서 조합방법에 의한 경사도 평가기법은 강우유출모델과 같은 수자원분야에서 해상도 변화에 따른 경사정보의 손실을 효과적으로 개선할 수 있을 있으리라 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이근상, 조기성(2002) GSIS 환경에서 DEM 정확도 분석 및 해상도의 영향 평가에 관한 연구, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 제22권 제3-D호, pp. 583-590
  2. 이원환 (1999) 수리학, 문운당, pp. 96-99
  3. ASCE (1999) GIS modules and distributed models of the watershed. ASCE: Virginia, USA
  4. Bartsch, P. (1998) Modelling Soil Loss to determine water erosion risk at Camp Williams national guard base. Ph.D. Dissertation, UTAH state university
  5. Burrough, P.A. (1986) Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, p. 50
  6. Dunn, M. and Hickey, R. (1998) The effect of slope algoritms on slope estimates within a GIS. Cartography, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 9-15 https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.1998.9714086
  7. Finnerty, D., Smith, M., Seo, D., Koren, V, and Molglen, E. (1997) Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radargage precipitation inputs. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 203, pp. 21-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00083-8
  8. Kennie, T.J.M. and Petrie, G. (1991) Introduction to Terrain Modelling - Application Fields and Terminology. McGraw-Hill, NY, USA
  9. Maidment, R. (1993) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw Hill, Inc., New york, USA
  10. McCool, D.K., Foster, G.R., Mutchler, C.K., and Meyer, L.D. (1989) Revised Slope Length Factor the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 1571-1576 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31192
  11. Shi, W.Z., Li, Q.Q., and Zhu, C.Q. (2005) Estimating the propagation error of DEM from higher-order interpolation algorithm. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 26, No. 14, pp. 3069-3084 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500057905
  12. Vieux, B.E. (1994) Distributed hydrologic modeling using GIS. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  13. Vieux, B.E and Bedient, P.B. (2004) Assessing urban hydrologic prediction accuracy through event reconstruction. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 299, pp. 217-236 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(04)00366-X
  14. Wang, F. and Hall, G.B. (1996) Fuzzy representation of geographical boundaries in GIS. International Journal of Geographic Information System, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 573-590 https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799608902098
  15. Wischmeier, W.H. and Smith, D.D. (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses; a guide to conservation planning. Agriculture Handbook, No. 537, US Department of Agriculture, US Government Printing Office, Washington, USA
  16. Yitayew, M., Pokrzywka, M.S., and Renard, K.G. (1999) Using GIS for facilitating erosion estimation. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, Vol. 15, pp. 295-301 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.5780