관조도와 난류를 고려한 부정류와 정상류 해석의 적용 연구

Transient and Steady State Analysis considering Roughness and Reynolds Number in Water Distribution Systems

  • 투고 : 2005.12.30
  • 심사 : 2006.05.18
  • 발행 : 2006.06.15

초록

In order to compute pressure variation for a water distribution system, an expression for the friction factor as a function of Reynolds number and the relative roughness needs to be properly incorporated in computational algorithm. Considering Moody s friction variation, Developed Unsteady Network Analyzer (UNA) has been modified to match computational results with EPANET 2.0. Substantial improvement can be found in the application of Improved UNA to both an hypothetical pipeline network and a real system located in Ulsan City. Random number generator is employed to represent the uncertainty of water use in real pipeline network. Comparisons of application between EPANET 2.0 and improved UNA 2.0 indicate advantages and potentials of this approach.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김상현, 김봉기, 조임영, 이현동 (2003) 관로시스템의 천이류 해석에 의한 부정류 마찰항 고려방법에 대한 비교 연구, 대한환경공학회지. Vol. 25, Issue. 5, pp. 602-608
  2. 한국토지공사 (2004) 주택단지내 적정 상수량 산정에 관한연구, 상하수도협회
  3. 울산시 2004년 2월 상수도 검침량 (2004) 상수도시설관리사업소
  4. Haaland S.E. (1981) Simple and Explicit Formulas for the Friction Factor in Turbulent Pipe Flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering. ASME, vol 105, pp. 89-90
  5. Rossman L.A. (2000) 'EPANET2 Users Manual', EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
  6. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A, Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. (1994), Numerical Recipes in Fortran, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, p. 266-319
  7. Colebrook, C.F., (1939), Turbulent Flow in Pipes, With Particular Reference to the Transition Region Between the Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws. J. Inst. Civ. Eng., vol. 11, pp. 133-156 https://doi.org/10.1680/ijoti.1939.13150
  8. Wylie. E. B., Streeter V. L. (1993) Fluid transients in systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood cliffs, N.J