대한수의학회지 (Korean Journal of Veterinary Research)

  • 제46권3호
  • /
  • Pages.185-196
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 2466-1384(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1392(eISSN)
대한수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Science)
권호 표지

육계의 뉴켓슬병 방어역가 측정에 있어서 ELISA 검사법의 효용성

Efficacy of ELISA for measurement of protective newcastle disease antibody level in broilers

  • 김종녀 (충북대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 허원 ((주)대성미생물연구소) ;
  • 모인필 (충북대학교 수의과대학)
  • Kim, Jong-Nyeo (Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine/College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Heo, won (Daessung Microbiological Labs. Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Mo, In-Pil (Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine/College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
  • 심사 : 2006.05.28
  • 발행 : 2006.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Newcastle disease (ND) is a highly contagious disease of poultry that can cause severe economic losses throughout the world. Vaccination has been used for a long time and proved as one of the most effective method to reduce the economic loss due to ND virus infection, The measurement of antibody titer such as hamagglutination-inhibition (Hl) test with sera has been used as a useful method to evaluate the immunity leve of host. However, Hl test is gradually being replaced by the enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA), To evaluate the efficacy of ELISA in the chickens vaccinated with different procedure, present study has been performed. After SPF chicks and commercial broilers were vaccinated with different kinds of live vaccines such as V4, VG/GA and/or Bl at various time, the antibody level has been measured using both HI test and ELISA. Challenge test with velogenic viscerotropic NDV was also performed to measure the protective level of antibody. In the SPF chickens, the mean ELISA titer after vaccination and survival rate after challenge was increased and correlated with days post inoculation. More than 80% of chickens with higher than 1,000 ELISA titer after vaccination were survived after challenge with velogenic ND virus and had good correlation between survival rate and antibody titier. In commercial broiler chickens, most of them at market age had low level of ELISA titer regardless of the number of vaccination, and had a low correlation between survival rate and ELISA titer. However, the ELISA titer of remaining birds after challenge was increased. This result indicated that ELISA titer had good response against velogenic NOV infection compared to Hl titer.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : (주)메덱스

참고문헌

  1. 송창선, 이윤정, 한명국, 성환우, 강경수, 이중복, 김재학 등. 최근 야외농장에서 실시하고 있는 뉴캣슬병 생독백신 접종효능에 대한 평가. 대한수의학회지. 2000, 40(3), 563-573
  2. Adair BM, McNulty, MS, Todd D, Connor TJ, Burns K. Quantitative estimation of Newcastle disease virus antibody levels in chickens and turkeys by ELISA. Avian Pathol. 1989, 18, 175-192 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458908418589
  3. Alexader DJ, Collins MS. The structural polypeptides of avian paramyxovirises. Arch. Virol. 1981, 67, 309-323 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01314834
  4. Alexander DJ. Newcastle disease in countries of the European Union. Avian Pathol. 1995, 24, 3-10 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459508419045
  5. Alexander DJ. Newcastle disease and other avian paramyxoviridae infections. In Calnek BW, with John Barnes H, Beard CW, McDougald LR, Saif YM. (eds.), Disease of poultry. 1997, 10th ed, Iowa state University Press. Ames. IA. pp. 541-569
  6. Alexander DJ. Newcastle disease in ostriches (Struthio camelus)-a review. Avian Pathol. 2000, 29, 95-100 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450094117
  7. Al-Garib SO, Gielkens ALJ, Gruys E, Hartog L, Koch G. Immunoglobulin class distribution of systemic and mucosal antibody response to Newcastle diasease in chickens. Avian Dis. 2003, 47, 32-40 https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086(2003)047[0032:ICDOSA]2.0.CO;2
  8. Allan WH, Lancaste JE, Toth B. Newcastle disease vaccines-their production and use. Animal Production and Health Series No. 10. 1978 FAO, Rome, Italy
  9. Daniele RP. Immunoglobulin secretion in the airway. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 1990, 52, 177-195 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.52.030190.001141
  10. De Leevw O, Peeters B. Complete nucleotide sequence of Newcastle disease virus: Evidence for the existence of a new genus within the subfamily Paramyxovirinae. J. Gen. Virol. 1999, 80, 131-136 https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-80-1-131
  11. Fedova D, Novotny J, Kubinova I. Serological diagnosis of parainfluenza virus infections: Verification of the sensitivity and specificity of the heamagglutination-inhibition (HI), complement-fixation (CF), immunofluorescence (IFA)test and enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). Acta virol. 1992, 36, 304-312
  12. Giambrone JJ. Laboratory evaluation of Newcastle disease vaccination programs for broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 1985, 29, 479-487 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590509
  13. Holmes HC. Resistance of the respiratory tract of the chicken to Newcastle disease virus infection flowing vaccination: The effect of passively acquired antibody on its development. J. Comp. Pathol. 1979, 89, 11-19 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9975(79)90003-3
  14. Holmes HC. Virus neutralizing antibody in sera and secretion of the upper and lower respiratory tract of the chicken inoculatecd with live and inactivated Newcastle disease. J. Comp. Pathol. 1979, 89, 21-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9975(79)90004-5
  15. Iorio R, Bratt M. Neutralization of Newcastle disease virus by monoclonal antibodies to the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein: requirement for antibodies to four sites $f_0$ complete neutralization. J. Virol. 1984, 51, 445-451
  16. Iorio RM, Borgman JB, Glickman RL, Bratt M. Genetic variation within a neutralizing domain on the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein of Newcastle disease virus. J. Gen. Virol. 1986, 67, 1393-1403 https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-67-7-1393
  17. Jayawardane GW, Spradbrow PB. Mucosal immunity in chickens vaccinated with the V4 strain of Newcastle disease virus. Vet Microbiol. 1995, 46, 69-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(95)00073-J
  18. Kant A, Koch G, Van Roozelaar DJ, Balk F, Ter Huurne A. Differentiation of virulent and non-virulent strains of newcastle disease virus within 24 hours by polymerase chain reaction. Avian Pathol. 1997, 26, 837-849 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459708419257
  19. Korani T, Odagiri Y, Nakamura J, Horlughi T. Pathological changes of tracheal mucosa in chickens infected with lentogenic NDV. Avian Dis. 1987, 31, 491-497 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590729
  20. Marino OC, Hanson RP. Cellular and humoral response of in ovo-bursectomized chickens to experimental challenge with velogenic Newcastle disease virus. Avian Dis. 1987, 31, 293-301 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590875
  21. Marquardt WW, Snyder DB, Savage PK, Kadavil SK, Uancey FS. Atibody response to Newcastle disease virus given by two different routes as measured by ELISA and Hemagglutination-Inhibition test and associated tracheal immunity. Avian Dis. 1985, 29, 71-79 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590695
  22. Meulemans G, Gonze M, Carlier MC, Petit P, Burny A, Le Long L. Protective effect of HN and F glycoprotein-specific monoclonal antibodies on experimental Newcastle disease. Avian Pathol. 1986, 15, 761-768 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458608436338
  23. Miers LA, Bankowski RA, Zee YC. Optimizing the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for evaluating immunity of chickens to Newcastle disease. Avian Dis. 1983, 27, 1112-1125 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590211
  24. Parry SH, Aitken ID. Local immunity in the respiratory tract of the chicken, II The secretory immune response to Newcastle disease virus and the role of IgA. Vet. Microbiol. 1977, 2, 143-165 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(77)90005-0
  25. Pipkin PA, Afzal MA, Heath AB, Linor PD. Assay of humoral immunity to mumps virus. J. Vrol. Methods. 1999, 79, 219-225 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00019-1
  26. Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method for estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 1938, 27, 493-497
  27. Reynlods DL, Maraqa AD. Protective immunity against Newcastle disease virus: The role of antibodies specific to Newcastle disease virus polypeptides. Avian Dis. 2000, 44, 138-144 https://doi.org/10.2307/1592517
  28. Reynolds DL, Maraqa AD. Protective immunity against Newcastle disease virus: The role of cell-mediated immunity. Avian Dis. 2000, 44, 145-154 https://doi.org/10.2307/1592518
  29. Russell PH, Dwivedi PN, Davison TF. The effect of cyclosporin A and cyclophosphamide on the populations of B and T cells and virus in the Harderian of chickens vaccinated with the Hitcher B1 strain of Newcastle disease virus. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1997, 60, 171-185 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2427(97)00094-9
  30. Russell PH. Newcastle disease virus: Virus replication in the Harderian gland stimulates lacrimal 19A; the yolk sac provides early lacrimal IgG Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1993, 37, 151-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2427(93)90062-9
  31. Samberg Y, Hornstein K, Cuperstein E, Rivka G. Spray vaccination of chickens with an experimental vaccine against Newcastle disease. Avian Pathol. 1977, 6, 251-258 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457708418233
  32. Steward M, Vipond IB, Millar NS, Emmerson PT. RNA editing in Newcastle disease virus. J. Gen. Virol. 1993, 76, 2519-2527
  33. Stone-Hulslander J, Morrison TG. Detection of an interaction between the HN and F proteins in Newcastle disease virus-infected cells. J. Virol. 1997, 71, 6287-6295
  34. Timms L, Alexander DJ. Cell-mediated immune response of chickens to Newcastle disease vaccines. Avian Pathol. 1977, 6, 51-59 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457708418212
  35. Wilson RA, Charles PJ, Betsy F, Robert JE. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that measures protective antibody levels to Newcastle disease virus in chickens. Avian Dis. 1984, 28, 1079-1085 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590283