DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Breed (Lean or Fat Pigs) and Sex on Performance and Feeding Behaviour of Group Housed Growing Pigs in a Tropical Climate

  • Renaudeau, D. (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unite de Recherches Zootechniques) ;
  • Giorgi, M. (Unite de Production et de Sante Animale) ;
  • Silou, F. (Unite de Production et de Sante Animale) ;
  • Weisbecker, J.L. (Unite de Production et de Sante Animale)
  • 투고 : 2005.07.05
  • 심사 : 2005.10.19
  • 발행 : 2006.04.01

초록

The effects of breed and sex on individual growth performance and feeding behaviour were studied between 45 and 90 kg BW in two replicates of forty group-housed pigs. The first and the second replicates were carried out during the warm season (i.e. between February and April 2003) and during the hot season (i.e. between August and October 2003), respectively. During the warm season, ambient temperature and relative humidity averaged $25.3^{\circ}C$ and 86.0%. The corresponding values for the hot season were $27.9^{\circ}C$ and 83.6%. The pigs were grouped in pens of 10 animals on the basis of breed (Creole or Large White) and sex (gilt or castrated male) and given ad libitum access to a grower diet (9.0 MJ/kg net energy and 158 g/kg crude protein) via feed intake recording equipment (Acema 48). An ear-tag transponder was inserted into each pig and this allowed the time, duration, and size of individual visits to be recorded. The growth performance and feeding pattern were significantly affected by breed, sex, and season. The Creole pigs (CR) had a lower average daily gain (ADG) (642 vs. 861 g/d, p<0.01) and carcass lean content ($LC_{90kg}$) (35.4 vs. 54.5%; p<0.01) and a higher backfat thickness at 90 kg BW ($BT_{90kg}$) (23.4 vs. 10.4 mm; p<0.01) than Large White pigs (LW) whereas the average daily feed intake (ADFI) was not affected by breed (2.34 vs. 2.22 kg/d, respectively for CR and LW pigs; p>0.10). Consequently, the food:gain ratio was higher in CR than in LW (3.65 vs. 2.58; p<0.01). CR had less frequent meals but ate more feed per meal than LW (5.9 vs. 8.8 meals/d and 431 vs. 279 g/meal; p<0.01). The rate of feed intake was lower (27.6 vs. 33.9 g/min; p<0.01) and the ingestion time per day and per meal were higher in CR than in LW (87.1 vs. 69.7 min/d and 15.8 vs. 8.4 min/meal; p<0.01). The ADFI and BT90 kg were higher (2.38 vs. 2.17 kg/d and 18.1 vs. 15.9 mm; p<0.05) and LC90 kg was lower (43.5 vs. 46.4%; p<0.01) in castrated males (CM) than in gilts (G) whereas ADG was not affected by sex (p = 0.12). The difference in lean content between CM and G was greater in CR than in LW. The ADFI and ADG were reduced during the hot season (2.18 vs.2.38 kg/d and 726 vs. 777 g/d, respectively; p<0.05) whereas feed conversion and carcass lean content were not affected by season (p>0.05). Average feeding time per meal and meal size decreased during the hot season (10.9 vs. 13.2 min/meal and 316 vs. 396 g/meal; p<0.01) whereas the rate of feed intake was not affected by season (p = 0.83). On average, 0.69 of total feed intake was consumed during the diurnal period. However, this partition of feed intake was significantly affected by breed, sex, and season. In conclusion, the breed, sex and season significantly affect performance and feeding pattern in growing pigs raised in a tropical climate. Moreover, the results obtained in the present study suggest that differences observed in BW composition between CR and LW are associated with difference in feeding behaviour, in particular, the short-term regulation of feed intake.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Azzara, A. V. 2004. Genetic and biobehavioral analysis of the controls of meal size in mice. Appetite 42:107-109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2003.08.012
  2. Berbigier, P. 1975. Echanges thermiques au niveau de la peau des porcelets eleves en climat tropical 1. Influence des conditions climatiques et de la race. Annales de Zootechnie 24:423-432 https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:19750308
  3. Canope, I. and Y. Raynaud. 1981. Etude comparative des performances de reproduction, d'engraissement et de carcasse des porcs Creoles et large White en Guadeloupe. Journee de la Recherche Porcine en France 13:307-316
  4. de Haer, L. C. M. and A. G. de Vries. 1993. Effects of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern of group housed growing pigs. Lives. Prod. Sci. 36:223-232 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(93)90055-M
  5. de Haer, L. C. M. and J. W. M. Merks. 1992. Patterns of daily food intake in growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 54:95-104 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100020614
  6. Feedes, J. J. R., B. A. Young and J. A. DeShazer. 1989. Influence of temperature and light on feeding behaviour of pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23:215-222 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90112-3
  7. Foster, W. H., D. J. Kilpatrick and I. H. Heaney. 2004. Genetic variation in the efficiency of energy utilization by the fattening pig. Anim. Prod. 37:387-393 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100001999
  8. Houpt, T. R. 1984. Control of feeding in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 59:1345-1353 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5951345x
  9. Hyun, Y. and M. Ellis. 2002. Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:568-574
  10. Hyun, Y., M. Ellis, F. K. McKeith and E. R. Wilson. 1997. Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1443-1451
  11. Hyun, Y., B. F. Wolter and M. Ellis. 2001. Feed intake pattern and growth performance of purebred and crossbred Meishan and Yorkshire pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:837-843 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.837
  12. Kadzere, C. T., M. R. Murphy, N. Silznikove and E. Maltz. 2002. Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Lives. Prod. Sci. 77:59-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00330-X
  13. Labroue, F., R. Gueblez, P. Sellier and M. C. Meunier-Salaün. 1994. Feeding behaviour of group-housed Large White and Landrace pigs in French central test stations. Lives. Prod. Sci. 40:303-312 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(94)90097-3
  14. Le Dividich, J., J. Noblet, P. Herpin, J. van Milgen and N. Quiniou. 1998. Thermoregulation. In: Progress in Pig Science (Ed. J. Wiseman, M. A. Varley and J. P. Chadwick), pp. 229-263. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham
  15. Lee, D. N., H. T. Yen and C. S. Chi. 1995. Factors affecting feed intake in boars. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci. 24:237-246
  16. Levasseur, P., V. Courboulay, M. C. Meunier-Salaün, J. Y. Dourmad and J. Noblet. 1998. Influence de la source d'energie et de la concentration energetique de l'aliment sur le comportement alimentaire, les performances zootechniques et les qualites de carcasse du porc charcutier. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 30:245-252
  17. Massabie, P., R. Granier and J. L. Dividich. 1996. Influence de la temperature ambiante sur les performances zootechniques du porc a l'engrais alimente ad libitum. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 28:189-194
  18. Metayer, A. and G. Daumas. 1998. Estimation, par decoupe, de la teneur en viande maigre des carcasses de porcs. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 30:7-11
  19. Nielsen, B. L. 2001. The effect of group size on the behaviour and performance of growing pigs using computerised single-space feeders. Pig News and Information 14:127N-129N
  20. Nielsen, B. L., A. B. Lawrence and C. T. Whittemore. 1995. Effect of group size on feeding behaviour, social behaviour, and performance of growing pigs using single- space feeders. Lives. Prod. Sci. 44:73-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(95)00060-X
  21. Nienaber, J. A., G. L. Hahn, R. A. Eigenberg, R. L. Korthals, J. T. Yen and D. L. Harris. 1997. Genetic and heat stress interaction effects on finishing swine. In: Proceeding of the fifth International Symposium - Livestock Environment (Ed. R. W. Bottcher and S. J. Hoff), pp. 1017-1023. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Bloomington, Minnesota
  22. Nienaber, J. A., G. L. Hahn, R. L. Korthals and T. P. McDonald. 1993. Eating behavior of swine as influenced by environmental temperature. Transactions of the ASAE 36:937- 944
  23. Noblet, J., C. Karege and S. Dubois. 1994. Prise en compte de la variabilité de la composition corporelle pour la prevision du besoin energetique et de l'efficacite alimentaire chez le porc en croissance. Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 26:267-276
  24. Noblet, J., C. Karege, S. Dubois and J. van Milgen. 1999. Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1208-1216
  25. Quiniou, N., S. Dubois, Y. L. Cozler, J. F. Bernier and J. Noblet. 1999a. Effect of growth potential (body weight and breed/castration combination) on the feeding behaviour of individually kept growing pigs. Lives. Prod. Sci. 61:13-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00048-2
  26. Quiniou, N., S. Dubois and J. Noblet. 2000a. Voluntary feed intake and feeding behaviour of group-housed growing pigs are affected by ambient temperature and body weight. Lives. Prod. Sci. 63:245-253 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00135-9
  27. Quiniou, N., P. Massabie and R. Granier. 2002. Diurnally variation of ambient temperature around 24 or 28$^{\circ}C$: Influence on performance and feeding behavior of growing pigs. In: Swine Housing. Proceedings of the First International Conference. pp. 232-239. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
  28. Quiniou, N., J. Noblet, J. Y. Dourmad and J. van Milgen. 1999b. Influence of energy supply on growth characteristics in pigs and consequences for growth modelling. Lives. Prod. Sci. 60:317-328 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00103-7
  29. Quiniou, N., D. Renaudeau, A. Collin and J. Noblet. 2000b. Effets de l'exposition au chaud sur les caracteristiques de la prise alimentaire du porc a diferents stades phydiologiques. INRA Prod. Anim. 13:233-245
  30. Quiniou, N., D. Renaudeau, S. Dubois and J. Noblet. 2000c. Effect of diurnally fluctuating high ambient temperatures on performance and feeding behaviour of multiparous lactating sows. Anim. Sci. 71:571-575 https://doi.org/10.1017/S135772980005534X
  31. Renaudeau, D., J. L. Weisbecker and J. Noblet. 2003. Effect of season and dietary fibre on feeding behaviour of lactating sows in a tropical climate. Anim. Sci. 77:429-437 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800054370
  32. Rinaldo, D., I. Canope, R. Christon, C. Rico, J. Ly and F. Dieguez. 2003. Creole pigs in Guadeloupe and Cuba : a comparison of reproduction, growth performance and meat quality in relation to dietary and environmental conditions. Pig News and Information 24:17-26
  33. Rinaldo, D., J. Le Dividich and J. Noblet. 2000. Adverse effects of tropical climate on voluntary feed intake and performance of growing pigs. Lives. Prod. Sci. 66:223-234 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00181-0
  34. SAS.1997. SAS/STAT User's Guide (version 7 4th Ed.). SAS Inst.Inc.cary, NC
  35. Wangsness, P. J., J. L. Gobble and G. W. Sherrit. 1980. Feeding behavior of lean and obese pigs. Physiol. Behav. 24:407-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(80)90107-9
  36. Xin, H. and J. A. de Shazer. 1991. Swine responses to constant and modified diurnal cyclic temperatures. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 34:2533-2540 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31903

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of housing conditions (clean vs. dirty) on growth performance and feeding behavior in growing pigs in a tropical climate vol.41, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9223-5
  2. Effect of heat challenge on peripheral blood mononuclear cell viability: comparison of a tropical and temperate pig breed vol.43, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9838-9
  3. Effect of gender, housing density and the interaction on growth performance and carcass and meat quality of pigs slaughtered at 110 kg body weight vol.11, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013111-2869
  4. Acclimation to high ambient temperature in Large White and Caribbean Creole growing pigs1 vol.85, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-430
  5. Effects of Dehairing Methods and Sex on Pork Quality and Boar Taint Compound Levels in Tissues vol.20, pp.10, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1618
  6. Effect of sugarcane diets and a high fibre commercial diet on fresh meat and dry-cured ham quality in local Caribbean pigs vol.82, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.12.013
  7. Tail-biting: A new perspective vol.186, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.028
  8. Effects of mammalian in utero heat stress on adolescent body temperature vol.29, pp.7, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2013.843723
  9. Breed Characteristics of Indigenous Pigs in Okinawa :Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality vol.54, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5938/youton.54.3_121
  10. Effect of feed restriction and refeeding on performance and metabolism of European and Caribbean growing pigs in a tropical climate vol.9, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41145-w
  11. Effect of chronic and acute heat challenges on fecal microbiota composition, production, and thermoregulation traits in growing pigs1,2 vol.97, pp.9, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz222
  12. Effect of MSTN Mutation on Growth and Carcass Performance in Duroc × Meishan Hybrid Population vol.10, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060932
  13. Modeling chlordecone toxicokinetics data in growing pigs using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach vol.250, pp.None, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126151
  14. Effects of sire line, birth weight and sex on growth performance and carcass traits of crossbred pigs under standardized environmental conditions vol.63, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-63-367-2020
  15. Effects of Feed Removal during Acute Heat Stress on the Cytokine Response and Short-Term Growth Performance in Finishing Pigs vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010205
  16. The Genetics of Thermoregulation in Pigs: A Review vol.8, pp.None, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.770480
  17. Effects of acute heat stress on salivary metabolites in growing pigs: an analysis using nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics profiling vol.63, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e23