임플랜트 지대주 재료에 대한 치은 섬유아세포의 반응

ATTACHMENT AND PROLIFERATION OF HUMAN GINGIVAL FIBROBLASTS ON THE IMPLANT ABUTMENT MATERIALS

  • 임현필 (전남대학교 치의학 전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 김선헌 (전남대학교 치의학 전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 박상원 (전남대학교 치의학 전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 양홍서 (전남대학교 치의학 전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 방몽숙 (전남대학교 치의학 전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 박하옥 (전남대학교 치의학 전문대학원 보철학교실)
  • Lim Hyun-Pil (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim Sun-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park Sang-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yang Hong-So (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Vang Mong-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park Ha-Ok (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Chonnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.02.01

초록

Purpose: The biocompatibility and bio-adhesive property of a dental implant abutment are important for proper soft tissue healing and maintenance of osseointegration of implant. However, studies of soft tissue healing and mucosal attachment of various materials of implant abutment other than titanium are still needed. In this study, cell attachment, proliferation, cytotoxicity of human gingival fibroblast for ceramic, gold alloy, Ni-Cr alloy and, commercially available pure titanium as a control were evaluated, using MTS and scanning electron microscopy. Materials and Methods: Specimen was designed to disc, 4mm diameter and 1mm thickness, made of ceramic, gold alloy, Ni-Cr alloy and commercially available pure titanium. Primary culture of human gingival fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotics. Cells were inoculated in the multiwell plates placed the specimen disc. Cell Titer 96 AQucous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay were done after 1hour 3hours, 24hours, 3days, 5days of incubation. The discs were processed for scanning electron micrography to evaluate cell attachment and morphologic change. Results: The results were obtained as fellows. 1. The ceramic showed high cell attachment and proliferation and low cytotoxicity, which is as much bioadhesive and biocompatible as titanium. 2. The gold alloy represented limited proliferation of human gingival fibroblast and the highest cytotoxicity among tested materials (p<0.05). 3. The Ni-Cr alloy limited the proliferaion of the human gingival fibroblast compared to titanium(p<0.05) but cytotoxicity on the bottom of well was not so considerable, compared to titanium. 4. On the scanning electron micrographs , the ceramic showed good attachment and proliferation of human gingival fibroblast, which was similar to titanium. But gold alloy and Ni-Cr alloy showed the shrinkage of gingival fibroblast both after 24 hours and 3 days. On 5th day, small amount of the human gingival fibroblast proliferation was observed on the Ni-Cr alloy, while the shrinkage of gingival fibroblast was still observed on the gold alloy. Conclusions: These results suggest that the ceramic abutment is as biocompatible as titanium to make proper mucosal seal. The gold alloy has a high cytotoxicity to limit proliferation of gingival fibroblast, which suggest limited use on the anterior tooth where soft tissue healing is recommeded.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. McKinney RV, Steflik DE, Koth DL. Evidence for junctional epithelial attachment to ceramic dental implants : A transmission electron microscope study. J Periodontol 1985: 425-436
  2. Adell R. Lekholm U, Rockler B. Branemark P-I, Lindhe J, Eriksson B. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. 1. A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986: 15:39-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80010-2
  3. Lekholm U, Ericsson I. Adell R. Slots J. The condition of the soft tissues at tooth and fixture abutments supporting fixed bridges : A microbiological and histological study. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:558-562 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00847.x
  4. Akagawa Y. Takata T. Matsumoto. T. Nikai H. Tsuru H. Correlation between clinical and histological evaluations of the peri-implant gingival around single crystal sapphire endosseous implant. J Oral Rehabil 1989; 16: 581-587 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01381.x
  5. Gould TR. Brunette DM. Westbury L. The attachment mechanism of epithelial cells to titanium in vitro. Journal of Periodontal Research 1981: 16: 611-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1981.tb00999.x
  6. Berglundh T. Lindhe J. Dimension of the peri-implant mucosa : Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00520.x
  7. Lee DH, Kim WH, Seol KS. Lee JH, Lee YS. Choi SK. Osseointegrated Implant. p455. Shinhung international co. 2002
  8. Friadent Catalog. p 115. Friadent. 2002
  9. Kucey BK. Fraser DC. The Procera abutment-the fifth generation abutment for dental implants. Journal of Canadian Dental Association. Journal de L' Association Dentaire Canadienne 2000; 66: 445-9
  10. Abrahamsson I. Berglundh T. Glantz PO. Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1998 :25: 721-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02513.x
  11. Thomson P. Larsson C. Ericson L E. Sennerby L. Lausmaa J. Kasemo B. Structure of the interface between rabbit cortical bone and implants of gold. zirconium and titanium. Journal of materials science : Materials in Medicine 1997; 8 : 653-66 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018579605426
  12. Myer AE. Baier RE. Glantz P-O. Naiella JR. Biomaterials: Selection. evaluation. and preparation. Dental Implants. Principles and practice. pp31-42 W.B. Saudners Comp. Philadelphia 1991
  13. Chung HJ. Documentary consideration and prevention of crestal bone loss around Implant. Dental Success 2003:23:48-58
  14. Hashimoto M, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Single-crystal sapphire endosseous dental implant loaded with functional stress-clinical and histological evaluation of peri-implant tissues. J Oral Rehabil 1988: 15: 65-76 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1988.tb00147.x
  15. Hashimoto M, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Ultrastructure of the peri-implant junctional epithelium on single-crystal sapphire endosseous dental implant loaded with functional stress. J Oral Rehabil 1989:16:261-70 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01341.x
  16. Arvidson K, Fartash B, Moberg LE, Grafstrom R. Ericsson I. In vitro and in vivo experimental studies on single crystal sapphire dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991 :2:47-55 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020201.x
  17. Arvidson K, Fartash B, Hilliges M, Kondell PA. Histological characteristics of peri-implant mucosa around Branemark and single-crystal sapphire implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996:7:1-10 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070101.x
  18. Steinmann S. Titanium-the material of choice? Perio 2000 1998: 17 : 7-21 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00119.x
  19. Moon IS. The relationship between implant and surrounding tissue in a periodontal point of view. Dental Implant 2002:2(3) :20-26
  20. Craig RG. Hanks CT. Cytotoxicity of experimental casting alloys evaluated by cell culture tests. J Dent Res 1990:69:1539-42 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690081801
  21. Craig RG, Hanks CT. Reaction of fibroblasts to various dental casting alloys. J Oral Pathol 1988:17:341-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1988.tb01547.x
  22. Bumgardner JD, Lucas LC. Cellular response to metallic ions released from nickel-chromium dental alloys. J Dent Res 1995:74:1521-7 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740081401
  23. Bumgardner JD, Doeller J, Lucas LC. Effect of nickel-based dental casting alloys on fibroblast metabolism and ultrastructural organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1995:29:611-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290508
  24. Choi YJ, Yook JI, Chung MK. Cytotoxicty of dental cast base metal alloys on human oral keratinocytes. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 1999:37:717-729