한국안전학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Safety)

  • 제21권5호
  • /
  • Pages.77-83
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1738-3803(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9953(eISSN)
한국안전학회 (The Korean Society of Safety)
권호 표지

원자력발전소 조직의 성향과 종사자의 조직적합도 및 직무만족/몰입

Organizational Personality Types, Employer-Organization Fit and Job Satisfaction/Involvement of the Nuclear Power Plants

  • 김대호 (한국원자력연구소 계측제어.인간공학연구부) ;
  • 이용희 (한국원자력연구소 계측제어.인간공학연구부)
  • Kim, Dae-Ho (Instrumentation & Control.Human Factors Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Hee (Instrumentation & Control.Human Factors Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to assess the organizational personality types, employee-organization fits and the job satisfaction/involvement in a Korea standard nuclear power plant(NPP), which is a representative safety work place. First we chose 427 procedures that are related to safety out of 777 officially managed procedures referenced by 13.5 of FSAR(final safety analysis report). Next, we finally chose 70 procedures of 8 divisions for 44 employees regarding the duties for NPPs' division, experiences of operations, an operational know-how, and the indication of operational weakness. This study used OPTI(organizational personality type indicators) and the combination of 4 preference types for determining the organizational personality to produce personality types of organizations for NPPs' division. To assess the job satisfaction and involvement, we used a questionnaire and an interview, for 300 employees(83.5%) of the Korea standard NPP.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E., General systems theory: applications for organization and management, Academy of Management Journal, 15, pp. 444 -465, 1972
  2. Morgan, G., Images of organization, Sage Publications, 1986
  3. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L., The social psychology of organizations(2nd ed.), New York: Wiley, 1978
  4. Matteson, M. T., & Ivancevich, J. M., Type A and B behavior patterns and health symptoms: Examining individual and organizational fit, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 24, pp. 585 -589, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-198208000-00012
  5. O'Reilly, C. A., III, Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F., People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit, Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 487-516, 1991 https://doi.org/10.2307/256404
  6. Boxx, W. R., Odom, R. Y., & Dunn, M. G., Or- ganizational values and value congruency and their impact on satisfaction, commitment, and cohesion, Public Personnel Management, 20, 195 -205, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609102000207
  7. Vancouver, J. B., et al., Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, pp. 666-679, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.666
  8. Schneider, B. et al., Personality and organizations: A test of the homogeneity of personality hypothesis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, pp. 462-470, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.462
  9. Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H., Manual: A guide to the development and use of the MyersBriggs Type Indicator, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc, 1985
  10. Bridges, W., The character of organizations. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1992
  11. Locke, E. A., Handbook of industrial & organization psychology, Chicago: Raud McNally, 1976
  12. Smith, P. C. et al., The measurement of satisfaction in work and behavior, Chicago: Raud McNally, 1969
  13. Weiss, D. J. et al., Manual for the minnesota satisfaction questionnaire, Minnesota Studies on Vocational Rehabilitation, Vol 22, Minneapolis, MN: Industrial Relations Center, Work Adjustment Project, University of Minnesota, 1967
  14. Dunham, R. B. et al., Validation of the index of organizational reactions with the JDI, the MSQ, and face scales, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 20, pp. 420-432, 1977 https://doi.org/10.2307/255415
  15. Allen, N. J & Meyer, J. P., The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, pp. 1-18, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  16. 유태용, 조직의 성격유형을 측정하기 위한 척도 개발 연구, 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 12(1), pp. 113 -139, 1999
  17. Edwards, J. R., Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 46, pp. 641-665, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00889.x
  18. Kristof, A. L., Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, pp. 149, 1996
  19. Argyris, C., Some problems in conceptualizing or- ganizational climate: A case study of a bank. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 501-520, 1957 https://doi.org/10.2307/2390797
  20. Schneider, B., et al., What is this thing called fit? In N. R. Anderson & P. Herriott(Eds.), Handbook of selection and appraisal(2nd ed., pp. 393 -412) London: Wiley, 1997
  21. 김대호, 장통일, 이용희, 한국형 표준원전 조직의 조직성향과 적합도 및 직무만족/몰입, 한국안전 학회 추계학술대회, 2005