Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Study on osseointegration of a Korean Transitional implant system in beagle dog

성견에서 국산 임시 임플란트의 골 유착반응에 관한 연구

  • Lee, Wook-Jae (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jung, Jong-Won (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Sang (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Pi, Sung-Hee (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • You, Hyung-Keun (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Shin, Hyung-Shik (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 이욱재 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학 교실) ;
  • 정종원 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학 교실) ;
  • 김윤상 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학 교실) ;
  • 피성희 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학 교실) ;
  • 유형근 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학 교실) ;
  • 신형식 (원광대학교 치과대학 치주과학 교실)
  • Published : 2006.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, dental implant systems have been widely used for the treatment of the extraction site, but we have been confronted with many limitations in esthetics, phonetics and function. Transitional implants(TI) were developed as a method of providing fixed provisional restorations during conventional implant healing. Until now, little data have been provided on korean transitional implants. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implant placement site histologically after 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Materials and Methods : Test group( IntermetzzoTM MEGAGEN, KOREA) and control group(Mini Drive Lock, Intra Rock, U.S.A.) were immediately placed in interseptal or interproximal bone of beagle dog after mandibular premolars extraction, and had a healing period with non-submerged state but without loading, Both TI surfaces were composed of rough surfaces. Results: In the test group, the average percentage of BIC were respectively 39.40%(SD7.35) after 4 weeks and 44.05%(16.76) after 8 weeks, and In the control group were 50.75%(1.48) and 59.40%(0.00). Discussion: We evaluated the initial ability of the osseointegration of TI through this study. Because TI is placed with a conventional implant simultaneously and loaded immediately, the ability of osseointegration is a very important factor for the success of TI during the initial healing phase. Conclusion: The results of the histological evaluation of these two groups were similar to those mentioned in other studies for osseointegration of implant.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI: Osseointegration and its experimental back ground. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399- 410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Alberktsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants: A Swedish multicenter study of 8.139 consecutively inserted Novel pharma implants. J Periodontal 1988;59:287-296 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287
  3. Froum S, Emtiaz S, Bloom MJ, Tarnow DP. The use of transitional implants for immediate fixed temporary prostheses in cases of implant restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:737-746
  4. Petrungaro PS. Fixed temporization and bone-augmented ridge stabilization with transitional implants. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:1071-1078
  5. Nagata M, Nagaoka S, Mukunoki O. The efficacy of modular transitional implants placed simultaneously with implant fixtures. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:39-42, 44
  6. Bichacho N, Landsberg CJ, Rohrer M, Davidovich Y. Immediate fixed transitional restoration in implant therapy. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999;11:45-51
  7. Bohsali K, Simon H, Kan JY, Redd M. Modular transitional implants to support the interim maxillary overdenture. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:975-.978
  8. Petrungaro PS. Reconstruction of severely resorbed atrophic maxillae and management with transitional implants. Implant Dent 2000;9:271-277 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009030-00015
  9. Minsk L. Interim implants for immediate loading of temporary restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:186-196
  10. Brown MS, Tarnow DP. Fixed provisionalization with transitional implants for partially edentulous patients: A case report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2001;13:123-127
  11. Simon H, Angelo A Caputo. Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:839-845
  12. Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Schmidinger S. Provisional implants for anchoring removable interim prostheses in edentulous jaws: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:582-588
  13. Ahn MR, An KM, Choi JH, Sohn DS. Immediate loading with mini dental implants in the fully edentulous mandible. Implant Dent 2004;13:367-372 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000148560.65514.3d
  14. Froum SJ, Simon H, Cho SC, Elian N, Rohrer MD, Tarnow DP. Histologic evaluation of bone implant contact of immediately loaded transitional implants after 6 to 27 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:54-60
  15. Chopard RP. Histomorphometric evaluation of new bone formation in the diabetic rats submitted to insertion of the temporary implants. J Braz Dent 2004;15;no2
  16. Zubery Y, Bichacho N, Moses O, Tal H. Immediate loading of modular transitional implants: A histologic and histomorphometric study in dog. Int J Restorative Dent 1999;19:343-353
  17. Branemark PI: Introduction to osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. p.l. Berlin, Chicago, Tokyo, Quintessence, 1985
  18. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, & Lindstro J : Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone to implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1981;52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  19. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman O .: Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery1981; 16: 1.-132
  20. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI :A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery1981; 10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  21. Meredith N: Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1998;11: 491-501
  22. Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T,. : Tissue integrated prostheses : osseointegration in clinical dentistry, 1985; 1-343 Chicago: Quintessence
  23. Roberts WE, Garetto LP, De Castro RA: Remodeling of devitalized bone threatens periosteal margin integrity of endosseous titanium implants with threaded or smooth surfaces: indications for provisional loading and axially directed occlusion. Journal of Indiana Dental Association1989; 68: 19.24
  24. Branemar KR, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Thomsen P: Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: an experimental in vivo study in the rat. Biomaterials 1997; 18:969-978 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00018-5
  25. Kwak JW, Kim TH, Park HJ, Oh HK: 성견 장골에서 임플란트 표면 처리 방법에 다른 골 유착 효과. 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지 2004; 26: 531-540
  26. Novaes AB Jr, Souza SL, Oliveira PT, Souza AM, : Histomorphometric Analysis of the Bone-Implant Contact Obtained with 4 Different Implant Surface Treatments Placed Side by Side in the Dog Mandible. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2002;17:377-383
  27. Evans GH, Mendez AJ, Caudill RF.: Loaded and nonloaded titanium versus hydroxylapatite-coated threaded implants in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:360-371
  28. Novaes AB Jr, Vidigal GM Jr, Novaes AB, Grisi MFM, Polloni S, Rosa A. Immediate implants placed into infected sites: A histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:422-427
  29. Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF.: Evaluation of hydroxylapatitecoated titanium dental implants in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:601-607 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(87)90270-9
  30. Gammage DD, Bowman AE, Meffert RM, Cassingham RJ, Davenport WA.: A hsitologic and scanning electron micrographic comparison of the osseous interface in loaded IMZ and Integral implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Den1990;10:125.135
  31. Weber HP, Buser D, Donath K, et al.: Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:11-19 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070102.x
  32. Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR: Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998;19:2219-2232 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00144-6