References
- Young RH, Scully RE. Villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. a clinicopathologic analysis of 13 cases. Cancer 1989;63:1773-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19900501)63:9<1773::AID-CNCR2820630920>3.0.CO;2-J
- Ballo MS, Silverberg SG, Sidawy MD. Cytologic features of well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Acta Cytol 1996;40:536-40 https://doi.org/10.1159/000333911
- Novotny DB, Ferlisi P. Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the cervix: cytologic presentation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:383-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199711)17:5<383::AID-DC13>3.0.CO;2-J
- Chang WC, Matisic JP, Zhou C, Thomson T, Clement PB, Hayes MM. Cytologic features of villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cancer(Cancer Cytopathol) 1999;87:5-11 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990225)87:1<5::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO;2-D
- Khunamornpong S, Siriaunkgul S, Suprasert P. Welldifferentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytomorphologic observation of five cases. Diag Cytopathol 2002;26:10-4 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.10028
- Utsugi K, Shimizu Y, Akiyama F, Umezawa S, Hasumi K. Clinicopathologic features of villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecologic Oncology 2004;92:64-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.10.020
- Kaku T, Kamura T, Shigematsu T, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix with predominantly villoglandular papillary growth pattern. Gynecologic Oncology 1997;64:147-52 https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1996.4539
- Jones MW, Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ. Well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathological study of 24 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1993;12:1-7 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-199301000-00001
- Dede M, Deveci G, Deveci MS, et al. Villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in a pregnant woman: a case report and review of literature. Tohogu J Exp Med 2004;202:305-10 https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.202.305
- Macdonald RD, Kirwan J, Hayat K, Herrington CS, Shawki H. Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the cervix: clarity is needed on the histological definition for this difficult diagnosis. Gynecologic Oncology 2006;100:192-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.133
- Heron DE, Axtell A, Gerszten K, et al. Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the cervix recurrent in an episiotomy scar: a case report in a 32-year-old female. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:366-71 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.15231.x
- Garcea A, Nunns D, Ireland D, Brown L. A case of villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the cervix with lymph node metastasis. BJOG 2003;110:627-9 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02097.x
- Khunamornpong S, Maleemonkol S, Siriaunkgul S, Pantusart A. Well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a report of 15 cases including two with lymph node metastasis. J Med Assoc Thai 2001;84:882-8
- Fadare O, Zheng W. Well-differentiated papillary villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix with a focal high-grade component: is there a need for reassessment? Virchows Arch 2005;447:883-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-005-0030-3
- Bouman A, Oosterhuis GJ, Naudin ten Cate L, van Doorn GA. Villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the cervix Beware of a wolf in sheep's clothing. Eur J Obstet Gyncol Reprod Biol 1999;87:183-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00106-2
- Collinet P, Prolongeau JF, Vaneecloo S. Villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gyncol Reprod Biol 1999;86:101-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00047-0
- Ajit D, Dighe S, Gujral S. Cytologic features of villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Acta Cytol 2004;48:288-9
- Reale D, Vitullo G, Di Virgilio M, Trubiani O, Pizzicannella G. Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix: a case report. Pathologica 2001;93:128-31
- Burja IT, Thompson SK, Sawyer Jr WL, Shurbaji MS. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears. a study with cytohistologic correlation. Acta Cytol 1999;43:351-6 https://doi.org/10.1159/000331080
- DiTomasso JP, Ramzy I, Mody DR. Glandular lesions of the cervix. validity of cytologic criteria used to differentiate reactive changes, glandular intraepithelial lesions and adenocarcinoma. Acta Cytol 1996;40:1127-35 https://doi.org/10.1159/000333970
- Raab SS, Isacson C, Layfield LJ. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. cytologic criteria to separate clinically significant from benign lesions. Am J Pathol 1995;104:574-82
- Gray W, Mckee GT. Diagnostic cytopathology, 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone, 2003:660-832
- Peralta-Venturino MN, Purslow MJ, Kini SR. Endometrialcells of the 'lower uterine segment' (LUS) in cervical smears obtained by endocervical brushings:a source of potential diagnostic pitfall. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;12:263-71 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840120315
- Fadare O, Ghofrani M, Chacho MS, Parkash V. The significance of benign endometrial cells in cervicovaginal smears. Adv Anat Pathol 2005;12:274-87 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pap.0000184174.76221.eb
- Lee KR, Miner LJ, Granter SR. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. a study of 34 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;107:30-5 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/107.1.30
- Drijkoningen M, Meertens B, Lauweryns J. High grade squamous intraepithelial leison(CIN3) with extension into the endocervical clefts. difficulty of cytologic differentiation from adenocarcinoma in situ. Acta Cytol 1996;40:889-94 https://doi.org/10.1159/000333998