References
- Agarwal A, Sharma RK and Nelson DR. 2003. New semen quality scores developed by principal component analysis of semen characteristics. J. Androl., 24:343-352 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02681.x
- Armann RP. 1989. Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately? J. Androl., 10:89-98 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00066.x
- Armant DR and Ellis MA. 1995. Improved accuracy of sperm motility assessment using a modified Micro-Cell sperm counting chamber. Fertil. Steril., 63:1128-1130 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57562-1
- Auger J, Leonce S, Jouannet P and Ronot X. 1993. Flow cytometric sorting of living, highly motile human spermatozoa based on evaluation of their mitochondrial activity. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 41:1247-1251 https://doi.org/10.1177/41.8.8331289
- Bielanski W, Dudek E, Bittmar A and Kosiniak K. 1982. Some characteristis of common abnormal forms of spermatozoa in highly fertile stallions. J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl., 32:21-26
- Budworth PR, Amann RP and Chapman PL. 1988. Relationships between computerized measurements of motion of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa and fertility. J. Androl., 9:41-54 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1988.tb01007.x
- Chan SY, Wang C, Song BL, Lo T, Leung A, Tsoi WL and Leung J. 1989. Computer-assisted image analysis of sperm concentration in human semen before and after swim-up separation: Comparison with assessment by haemocytometer. Int. J. Androl., 12:339-345 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.1989.tb01322.x
- Coetzee K, Kruger TF and Lombard CJ. 1999. Repeatability and variance analysis on multiple computer-assisted (IVOS) sperm morphology readings. Andrologia, 31: 163-168 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0272.1999.00257.x
- Davis RO and Siemers RJ. 1995. Derivation and reliability of kinematic measures of sperm motion. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 7:857-869 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9950857
- Davis RO, Drobnis EZ and Overstreet JW. 1995. Application of multivariate cluster, discriminate function, and stepwise regression analyses to variable selection and predictive modeling of sperm cryosurvival. Fertil. Steril., 63:1051-1057 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57547-5
- Donnelly ET, Lewis SE, McNally JA and Thompson W. 1998. In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome. Fertil. Steril., 70: 305-314 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00146-0
- Dowsett KF and Pattie WA. 1982. Characteristics and fertility of stallion semen. J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl., 44:77-86
- Dunphy BC, Kay R, Barratt CL and Cooke ID. 1989. Quality control during the conventional analysis of semen, an essential exercise. J. Androl., 10:378-385 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00124.x
- Farrell PB, Foote RH, McArdle MM, Trouern-Trend VL and Tardif AL. 1996. Media and dilution procedures tested to minimize handling effects on human, rabbit, and bull sperm for computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA). J. Androl., 17:293-300
- Fernandes PA, McCoshen JA, Cheang M, Kredentser JV and Wodzicki AM. 1990. Quantitative analysis of the effect of freezing on donor sperm motion kinetics. Fertil. Steril., 54:322-327 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53711-X
- Hirano Y, Shibahara H, Obara H; Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, Yamaguchi C, Tsunoda H and Sato I. 2001. Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) and fertilization rates in vitro. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 18:213-218
- Holt W, Watson P, Curry M and Holt C. 1994. Reproducibility of computer-aided semen analysis: comparison of five different systems used in a practical workshop. Fertil. Steril., 62:1277-1282 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57201-X
- Iguer-Ouada M and Verstegen JP. 2001. Evaluation of the 'Hamilton Thorn computer-based automated system' for dog semen analysis. Theriogenology, 55:733-749 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00440-X
- Imade GE, Towobola OA, Sagay AS and Otubu JA. 1993. Discrepancies in sperm count using improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers. Arch. Androl., 31:17-22 https://doi.org/10.3109/01485019308988375
- Jequier AM and Ukombe EB. 1983. Errors inherent in the performance of a routine semen analysis. Br. J. Urol., 55:434-436 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1983.tb03339.x
- Jeulin C, Lewin LM, Chevrier C and Schoevaert Brossault TD. 1996. Changes in flagella movement of rat spermatozoa along the length of the epididymis : Manual and computer-aided image analysis. Cell. Motil. Cystoskeleton, 35:147-161 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1996)35:2<147::AID-CM7>3.0.CO;2-7
- Johnson JE, Boone WR and Blackhurst DW. 1996. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer. Fertil. Steril., 65:156-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58044-3
- Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF and Oehninger S. 1988. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril., 49: 112-117 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59660-5
- Lackey BR, Boone WR, Gray SL and Henricks DM. 1998. Computer-assisted sperm motion analysis of bovine sperm treated with insulin-like growth factor I and II: implications as motility regulators and chemokinetic factors. Arch. Androl., 41:115-125 https://doi.org/10.3109/01485019808987953
- Magistrini M, Chanteloube P and Palmer E. 1987. Influence of season and frequency of ejaculation on production of stallion semen for freezing. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl., 35:127-133
- Marshburn PB, McIntire D, Carr BR and Byrd W. 1992. Spermatozoal characteristics from fresh and frozen donor semen and their correlation with fertility outcome after intrauterine insemination. Fertil. Steril., 58: 179-188 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55157-7
- McDonnell SM and Hize AL. 2005. Aversive conditioning of periodic spontaneous erection adversely affects sexual behavior and semen in stallions. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 89:77-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.06.016
- Purvis K, Tollefsrud A and Rui H. 1989. Correlates of human sperm motility assessed by laser Doppler spectroscopy. Int. J. Androl., 12:10-16 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.1989.tb01280.x
- Pusch HH, Leitinger S, Winter R and Urdl W. 1986. Evaluation of sperm motility by laser-Doppler-spectroscopy in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum. Reprod., 1:233-235 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136391
- Quintero-Moreno A, Miro J, Teresa Rigau A and Rodriguez-Gil JE. 2003. Identification of sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in stallion ejaculates. Theriogenology, 59: 1973-1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01297-9
- Rashid MRZ, Fishel SB and Thornton S. 1998. The predictive value of the zona free hamster egg penetration test in relation to in vitro fertilization at various insemination concentrations. Hum. Reprod., 13:624-629 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.3.624
- Squires EL, Pickett BW, Graham JK, Vanderwall DK, McCue PM and Bruemmer JE. 1999. Cooled and frozen stallion semen. Anim. Reprod. Biotech. Lab. Colorado State Univ. Bulletin No. 09
- Thurston LM, Watson PF, Mileham AJ and Holt WV. 2001. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J. Androl., 22:382-394
- Vetter CM, Miller JE, Crawford LM, Armstrong MJ, Clair JH, Conner MW, Wise LD and Skopek TR. 1998. Comparison of motility and membrane integrity to assess rat sperm viability. Reprod. Toxicol., 12:105-114 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6238(97)00155-X
- 박남건, 오운용, 이성수, 오창언, 강수원, 고서봉, 강민수, 김희석. 1995. 제주재래마 정액의 동결 보존에 관한 연구. 농업논문집, 37:459-463
- 양보석, 강승률, 이성수, 조인철, 검영훈, 전창익, 정진관, 2001. 제주마 정액의 일반성상에 관한 연구. 한국수정란이식학회지, 16: 127-131
- 오운용, 박남건, 김영훈, 이성수, 김희석, 김중계, 신원집. 1994. 제주재래마 정액의 일반성상에 관한 조사연구. 농업논문집, 36:552-557