참고문헌
- 교육부 (1992). 고등학교 과학과 교육과정해설-공통과학, 물리, 화학, 생물, 지구과학. 교육부 고시 제 1992-19호, 서울: 대한교과서 주식회사
- 교육부 (1997). 초.중등학교 교육과정-국민공통 기본 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제 1997-15호[별책 1], 서울: 대한교과서 주식회사
- 권용주, Lawson, A. E. (1999). Why do most science educators encourage to teach school science through lab-based instruction?: a neurological explanation. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(1), 29-40
- 권치순, 허명, 양일호, 김영선 (2004). 초.중고 학생들의 과학 태도 변화에 대한 학습환경의 원인 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), 1256-1271
- 김영신, 양일호 (2005). 초등학교 학생들의 과학 태도 변화에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 초등과학교육, 24(3), 292-300
- 김주훈, 이미경 (2003). 과학과 교육목표 및 내용체계 연구(I). 한국교육과정 평가원, 연구보고 RRC 2003-4, 28-43
- 김효남, 정완호, 정진우, 양일호, 김영신 (1999). 초.중고 학생들의 과학 정의적 특성 추이 분석을 위한 단적 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(2), 194-203
- 노태희, 최용남 (1996) 초.중.고 학생들의 과학 수업환경 인식 및 태도와의 관계성 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 16(2), 217-225
- 서창교, 김은진, 이영숙 (2001). 웹에 기반한 델파이 의사결정지원시스템의 구현. 정보시스템연구, 10(1), 5-25
- 송진웅, 박승재, 장경애 (1992). 초중고 남녀 학생의 과학수업과 과학자에 대한 태도. 한국과학교육학회지, 12(3),109-118
- 심규철, 김현섭, 박영철 (2001). 중.고등학생 및 대학생의 과학 관련 태도에 대한 비교 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(3), 558-565
- 양일호, 조현준 (2005). 학교 과학수업에서 실험의 목적에 대한 고찰. 초등과학교육, 24(3) , 268-280
- 윤덕근, 김성사, 차희영, 이길재, 정완호 (2004). 과학고 학생들의 창의력과 과학적 사고력 향상을 위한 생물 실험 모듈의 적용효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), 556-564
- 이미경, 김경희 (2004). 과학에 대한 태도와 과학성취도의 관계, 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 399-407
- 이종성 (2001). 델파이 방법. 서울: 교육과학사
- 이지현, 남정희, 문성배 (2003). 실험실습법에 의한 수행평가가 중학생의 과학성취도 및 정의적 영역에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(1), 66-74
- 임청환 (1995). 국민학생과 중학생들의 과학에 관련된 태도연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 15(2), 194-200
- 임청환, 남진수 (1999). 초등학생의 정신용량과 인지양식에 따른 과학탐구능력. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(3), 441-447
- 장소영, 노석구 (2005). 초등학생의 과학선호도에 영향을 주는 과학수업에 대한 인식 조사. 초등과학교육, 24(4), 435-442
- 조연순, 성진숙, 채제숙, 구성혜 (2000). 창의적 문제해결력 신장을 위한 초등과학교육과정 개발 및 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(2), 307-328
- 허명 (1993) 초.중.고 학생의 과학 및 과학교과에 대한 태도 조사 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 13(3), 334-340
- 홍미영, 정은영, 맹희주 (2002). 초등학교 과학과 교수.학습 방법과 자료 개발 연구. 한국교육과정평가원, 연구보고 RRC 2002-18, 18-20
- 홍형득 (2002). 지식정보화사회와 차기정부의 과제. 한국행정학회 2002 추계학술대회 발표논문집, 351-368
- AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1989). Science for all americans: a project 2061 report on literacy coaIs in science, mathematics, and technology (pp. 11-15). Washigton, D. C.: AAAS Publication
- AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of science). (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy (pp.281-300). New York: Oxford University Press
- Amanda, B., Pam, M., Richard, G., & John, L. (1999). Helping students learn from laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(1), 27-31
- Babikian, Y. (1971). An empirical investigation to determine the relative effectiveness of discovery, laboratory, and expository methods of teaching science concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(3), 201-209
- Bartholomew, H., Osborn, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students 'ideas-about-science': Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88(5), 655-682
- Beaumont-Walters, Y., & Soyibo, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students' performance on five integrated science process skills. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(2), 133-145
- Bekalo, S., & Welford, G. (2000) . Practical activity in Ethiopian secondary physical sciences: Implications for policy and practice of the match between the intended and implemented curriculum. Research Papers in Education, 15(2), 185-212
- Boud, D. J. (1973). The laboratory aims questionnairea new method for course improbement? Higher Education, 2. 81-94
- Boud, D. J. (1980). The aims of science laboratory course: A survey of studnets, graduates and practising scientists. European Journal of Science Education, 2(4), 415-421
- Boud, D., Dunn, J., & Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1986). Teaching in laboratories. Guilford: SRHE & NFER-Nelson
- Bredderman, T. (1983 ). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53, 499-518
- Bybee, R., & DeBoer, G. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357-387). New York:MacMillan
- Chang, C.-Y., & Weng, Y.-H. (2002). An exploratory study on students' problem-solving ability in earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 441-451
- Clough, M. P., & Clark, R. (1994). Cookbooks and constructivism- a better approach to laboratory activities. The Science Teacher, 61(2), 34-37
- Collins, S., Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2001). What 'ideas-about-science' should be taught in school science? A delphi study of the expert community. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association 2001, Seattle, 1-29
- Cyphert, F. R., & Gant, W. L. (1970). The Delphi technique: A tool for collecting opinions in teacher education. In Exploring the potential of the Delphi technique by analyzing its application. Syrnposium conducted by AERA in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Foster, D., & Lock, R. (1987). Teaching science (pp. 11-13). London: Croom Helm
- Gardner, B. J. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1-41
- Gardner, P., & Gauld, C. (1990). Labwork and students attitudes. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 132-156). London: Routledge
- Garnett, P. J., Garnett P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Refocusing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(2), 26-32
- Garnett, P. J., & O' Loughlin, M. O. (1989). Using practical tests to assess laboratory work in chemistry. Australian Science Teachers Journal. 35(4), 27-37
- Germann, P. J., & Aram, R. (1996). Students performance on the science process skills of recording data, analysing data, drawing conclusions and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 773-798
- Germann, P. J., Aram, R., & Burke, G (1996a). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh-grade students to the science process skill of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 79-99
- Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996b). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals:Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 475-499
- Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science & Education, 11, 55-67
- Gupta, V. (2001). Aims of laboratory teaching. Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1-3
- Hart, C, Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655-675
- Hegarty-Hazel, E. (Ed.). (1990). The student laboratory and the science curriculum. Routledge: London
- Hellingman, C. (1982). A trial list of objectives of experimental work in science education. European Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 4(1), 29-43
- Hodson, D. (1988). Experiments in science and science teaching. Educational Philosophy Theory, 20(2), 253-266
- Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755-760
- Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory. In J. J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in School Science (pp. 93-108). NY: Routledge
- Hofstein, A. (2004), The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education, 5(3), 247-264
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54
- Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory: Some thoughts from the literature. University chemistry education, 5(2), 42-51
- Karnpourakis, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2003). A study of the effect of a practical activity on problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(3). 319-333
- Kenyon, L., & Reiser, B. (2005). Students' epistemologies of science and their influence on inquiry practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, April 4-7, 2005. Dallas, TX
- Kerr, J. (1963). A Classic enquiry into the nature and purpose of school science practical work, based on a study of 701 teachers in 151 schools. Practical work in school science, Leicester: Leicester University Press
- Lazarowitz, R., & Tamir, R. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. Gabel (Ed), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 94-128). New York: MacMillan
- Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The School Science Laboratory: Historical perspectives and context for contemporary teaching. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, part 1 (pp. 249-262). Kluwer Academic Publishers
- McComas, W. F. (1997). Research on Curriculum, teaching, and learning- TIle laboratory environment: An ecological perspective. Science Education International, 8(2), 12-16
- Molitor, L., & George, K. (1976). Development of a test of science precess skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 405-412
- Nakayama, G. (1988). A study of the relationship between cognitive styles and integrated science process skills. ERIC No. ED 291 592
- Nott, M. (1997). Keeping scientists in their place. School Science Review, 78(285), 49-60
- Nott, M., & Smith, R. (1995). 'Talking your way out of it', 'rigging', and 'conjuring': What science teachers do when practieals go wrong. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 399-410
- Nott, M., & Wellington, J. J. (1996). When the black box springs open: practical work in schools and the nature of science, International Journal of Science Education, 18, 807-824
- Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72(2), 143-155
- Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What 'ideas-about-science' should be taught in school science? A delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720
- Padilla, M. J., Okey, J. R., & Dillashaw, F. G. (1981). The relationship between science process skill and formal thinking abilities. A Paper Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting (54th, Grossinger's in the Catskills, Ellenville, NY, April 5-8). ED 201 488
- Reynolds, A J., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 97-107
- Robertson, M., Line, M., Jones, S., & Thomas, S. (2000). International students, learning environments and perceptions: A case study using the Delphi technique. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(1), 89- 102
- Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197-223
- Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting: The role of the Delphi technique. International Series In Operations Research and Management Science, -(30), 125-144
- Schibeci, R. A. (1983). Selecting appropriate attitudinal objectives for school science. Science Education, 67(5), 595-603
- Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in western australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219-228
- Swain, J. R. L. (1974). Practical objectives- a review. Education in Chemistry, 11(4), 152-156
- Tasker, R. (1981). Children's views and classroom experiences. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27, 33-39
- Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418
- Trumper, R. (2003). The physics laboratory-a historical overview and future perspectives. Science & Education, 12(4), 645-670
- Watson, R. (2000). The role of practical work. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say, (pp. 57-71). Buckingham: Open University Press
- Wellington, J. J. (1998). Practical work in school: time for a re-appraisal. In J. J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in School Science (pp. 3-15). NY: Routledge
- Wellington, J. J. (2000). Teaching and learning secondary science - contemporary issues and practical approaches (pp. 145-155). London and New York; Routledge
- White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7). 761-774
- Whitman. N. I. (1990). The committee meeting alternative: Using the Delphi Technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20(7-8), 30-36