Molecular & Cellular Toxicology

The Korean Society of Toxicogenomics and Toxicoproteomics (대한독성유전 단백체학회)
권호 표지

Biological Effects of Ceramic-coating on Titanium

  • Sohn, Sung-Hwa (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Bum (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Nam (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hye-Won (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, In-Kyoung (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Ho (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University) ;
  • Seo, Sang-Hui (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Ri (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Min (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Meyoung-Kon (Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Korea University)
  • Published : 2006.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Several features of the implant surface, such as roughness, topography, and composition play a relevant role in implant integration with bone. This study was conducted in order to determine the effects of ceramic-coatings on Ti surfaces on the biological responses of a human osteoblast-like cell line (MG63). MG63 cells were cultured on Zr (Zrconium-coated surface), Nb (Niobium-coated surface), and control (Uncoated Titanium) Ti. The morphology of these cells was assessed by SEM. The cDNAs prepared from the total RNAs of the MG63 were hybridized into a human cDNA microarray (1,152 elements). The appearances of the surfaces observed by SEM were different on each of the three dental substrate types. MG63 cells cultured on Zr, Nb and control exhibited cell-matrix interactions. In the expression of several genes were up-, and down-regulated on the different surfaces. The attachment and expression of key osteogenic regulatory genes were enhanced by the surface morphology of the dental materials used.

Keywords

References

  1. Shah, A.K. et al. High-resolution morphometric analysis of human osteoblastic cell adhesion on clinically relevant orthopedic alloys. Bone 24(5) 499-506 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00077-0
  2. Cooper, L.F. et al. Incipient analysis of mesenchymal stem-cell-derived osteogenesis. J Dent Res. 80(1), 314-320 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800010401
  3. Carinci, F. et al. Titanium-cell interaction: analysis of gene expression profiling. J Biomed Mater Res. 66 B(1), 341-346 (2003)
  4. Viornery, C. et al. Osteoblast culture on polished titanium disks modified with phosphonic acids. J Biomed Mater Res. 62(1), 149-155 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10205
  5. Kim, H.K., Jang, J.W. & Lee, C.H. Surface modification of implant materials and its effect on attachment and proliferation of bone cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 15(7), 825-830 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000032824.62866.a1
  6. Ogawa, T., Sukotjo, C. & Nishimura, I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 11(4), 241- 247 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1053/jopr.2002.129772
  7. Schneider, G.B. et al. Implant surface roughness affects osteoblast gene expression. J Dent Res. 82(5), 372-376 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200509
  8. Carinci, F. et al. Zirconium oxide: analysis of MG63 osteoblast-like cell response by means of a microarray technology. Biomaterials 25(2), 215-228 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00486-1
  9. Orsini, G. et al. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(6), 779-784 (2000)
  10. Son, W.W. et al. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized/hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 66(2), 520-525 (2003)
  11. Ogawa, T. & Nishimura, I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 18(2), 200-210 (2003)
  12. Kim, C.S. et al. Effect of various implant coatings on biological responses in MG63 using cDNA microarray. J Oral Rehabil. 33, 368-379 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01553.x
  13. Kim, C.S. et al. Gene-expression profiling of titanium- cell interaction. J Korea Acad Prosthdont. 43(3), 393-408 (2005)
  14. Sohn, S.H. et al. Biological effects of different thin layer hydroxyapatite coatings on anodized titanium. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 1(4), 237-247 (2005)
  15. Carinci, F. et al. Analysis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells' response to a rough implant surface by means of DNA microarray. J Oral Implantol. 29(5), 215-220 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0215:AOOMCR>2.3.CO;2
  16. Hornez, J.C. et al. Multiple parameter cytotoxicity index on dental alloys and pure metals. Biomol Eng. 19(2-6), 103-117 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0344(02)00017-5
  17. Monsees, T.K. et al. Effects of different titanium alloys and nanosize surface patterning on adhesion, differentiation, and orientation of osteoblast-like cells. Cells Tissues Organs 180(2), 81-95 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1159/000086749
  18. Carinci, F. et al. Analysis of MG63 osteoblastic-cell response to a new nanoporous implant surface by means of a microarray technology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15(2), 180-186 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00997.x
  19. Lossdorfer, S. et al. Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity. J Biomed Mater Res. 70A(3), 361-369 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30025
  20. Chaudhary, L.R., Hofmeister, A.M. & Hruska, K.A. Differential growth factor control of bone formation through osteoprogenitor differentiation. Bone 34(3), 402-411 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2003.11.014
  21. Mustafa, K. et al. Determining optimal surface roughness of TiO (2) blasted titanium implant material for attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells derived from human mandibular alveolar bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 12(5), 515-525 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120513.x
  22. DeRisi, J. et al. Use of a cDNA microarray to analyse gene expression patterns in human cancer. Nat Genet. 14(4), 457-460 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1296-457
  23. Vawter, M.P. et al. Application of cDNA microarrays to examine gene expression differences in schizophrenia. Brain Res Bull. 55(5), 641-650 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00522-6
  24. Park, G.H. et al. Genome-wide expression profiling of 8-chloroadenosine- and 8-chloro-cAMP-treated human neuroblastoma cells using radioactive human cDNA microarray. Exp Mol Med. 34(3), 184-193 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2002.27
  25. Tanaka, T.S. et al. Genome-wide expression profiling of mid-gestation placenta and embryo using a 15,000 mouse developmental cDNA microarray. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97(16), 9127-9132 (2000)
  26. Eisen, M.B. et al. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95(25), 14863-14868 (1998)