DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전분 제조방법에 따른 밤전분의 이화학적 특성

Physicochemical Properties of Chestnut Starch According to the Processing Method

  • Kim, Yong-Doo (Division of Food Science, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Choi, Ok-Ja (Division of Food Science, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Shim, Ki-Hoon (Division of Food Science, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Cho, In-Kyung (Dept. of Food Science & Technology, Nambu University)
  • 발행 : 2006.03.01

초록

알칼리 침지법에 의하여 박피한 밤 전분과 박피하지 않은 밤 전분의 이화학적 특성, 가열 및 알칼리에 의한 호화특성을 각각 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 물결합력은 박피한 A전분의 경우86.9%, 박피하지 않은 B전분은 80.66%로 박피한 A전분이 더 높은 물결합력을 나타냈다. A전분과 B전분의 팽윤력은 $60^{\circ}C$에서 급격히 증가하기 시작하여 $80^{\circ}C$까지 증가하다가 그 이후는 완만하게 변하였고, 용해도는 $60^{\circ}C$에서부터 증가하기 시작하여 온도가 상승함에 따라 점점 증가하는 특성을 보였으며, A전분이 B전분보다 팽윤력과 용해도가 더 높게 나타났다. 요오드 반응은 A전분이 B전분보다 더 높게 났다. X-선 회절도는 A전분은 $C_b$도형, B전분은 B도형으로 나타났고, 상대적 결정화도는 A전분이 36.2%, B전분은 37.0%로 B전분이 더 높게 나타났다. DSC에 의하여 측정한 호화온도 및 호화엔탈피는 A전분의 경우 $66.95^{\circ}C{\sim}77.5^{\circ}C$, 2.04 cal/g, B전분의 경우 $67.09^{\circ}C{\sim}77.5^{\circ}C$, 2.29 cal/g으로 나타났다. 6.5% 밤 전분의 아밀로그램 특성은 A전분보다 B전분이 호화개시 온도가 더 높았고, peak viscosity, break-down, setback은 A전분이 B전분보다 더 높았다. 알칼리에 의한 호화특성에서 A전분이 B전분보다 점도, gel 부피 및 광투과도가 더 높게 나타났다.

This study is to investigate the physicochemical properties of differently pretreated chestnut starches during starch isolation and to examine their gelatinization properties by both heat and alkali treatments. One kind is starch A made by alkali method from peeled chestnut. The other is starch B made from chestnut with the outer layer. The results are as follows. Starch A has higher water binding capacity of 86.9% than starch B with 80.66%. Swelling powers of both starch A and B increased rapidly from $60^{\circ}C\;to\;80^{\circ}C$ in both, and since then it has changed a bit. Both began to show their solubility at $60^{\circ}C$ and increased continuously as the temperature went up. Starch A has higher swelling power and solubility than starch B. In iodine reaction, starch A has higher ${\lambda}max$ and absorbance at ${\lambda}max$ than starch B. X-ray diffraction patterns showed that starch A is type $C_b$ and that starch B is type B. Starch B has higher relative crystallinity of 37.0% than starch A with 36.2%. The results by differential scanning calorimetry revealed that starch A gelatinized from $66.95^{\circ}C$ to $77.5^{\circ}C$ and its enthalpy is 2.04 cal/g. And starch B gelatinized from $67.09^{\circ}C\;to\;77.5^{\circ}C$, and its enthalpy is 2.29 cal/g. Amylograms of chestnut starch at 6.5% concentration indicated that starch B needs higher onset temperature when beginning to gelatinize than starch A does. But starch A shows much higher peak viscosity, breakdown and setback than starch B does. Starch A shows higher viscosity, gel volume, and optical transmittance in gelatinization properties by alkali than starch B does.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 손철호, 석현덕, 민경택. 2003. 국내 밤산업의 동향과 전망. 농촌경제연구소. p 77-79
  2. Kim JS, Jung BH, Joo RW, Choi SI. 2004. Marketing of chestnut and economic analysis of chestnut cultivation. Korean J Forest Economics 12: 12-21
  3. FAOSTAT: http://apps.fao.org
  4. Kim JH, Park JB, Choi CH. 1997. Development of chestnut peeling system. Annual Meeting of The Biosystems Eng. p 150-154
  5. Kim SK, Jeon YJ, Kim YT, Lee BJ, Kang OJ. 1995. Physicochemical and texture properties of chestnut starches. J Korean Soc Food Nutr 24: 594-600
  6. Park IS, Kim SK, Kim CS. 1982. Physicochemical properties of chestnut starch. J Korean Agric Chem Soc 25: 218-223
  7. Park HH, Kim SK, Pyun YR, Lee SY. 1989. Rheological properties of chestnut starch solution. Korean J Food Sci Technol 21: 815-819
  8. Choo NY, Ahn SY. 1995. Properties of chestnut starch and it's gel. Korean J Food Sci Technol 27: 1017-1027
  9. Park YH, Kim SK, Lee SY, Kim JB. 1984. Rheological properties of gelatinized chestnut starch solution. Korean J Food Sci Technol 16: 314-318
  10. Park HH, Lee KH, Kim SK. 1986. Effect of heat-moisture treatments on physico-chemical properties of chestnut starch. Korean J Food Sci Technol 18: 437-442
  11. Yamamoto K, Sawada S, Onogaki T. 1973. Properties of rice starch prepared by alkali method with various conditions. J Jpn Soc Starch Sci 20: 99-104 https://doi.org/10.5458/jag1972.20.99
  12. Medcalf DF, Gilles KA. 1965. Wheat starches, I. comparison of physicochemical properties. Cereal Chem 42: 558-568
  13. Schoch TJ. 1964. Swelling power and solubility of granular starches. In Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Whistler RL, ed. Academic Press, New York. Vol 4, p 106-108
  14. Gilbert GA, Spragg SP. 1964. Iodimetric determination of amylose. In Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Whistler RL, ed. Academic Press, New York. Vol 4, p 168-169
  15. Nara S, Mori A, Komiya T. 1978. Study on relative crystallinity of moist potato starch. Starch 30: 111-114 https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19780300403
  16. Donovan JW. 1979. Phase transitions of the starch-water system. Biopolymer 18: 263-267 https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1979.360180204
  17. Wilson LA, Birmingham VA, Moon DP, Snyder HE. 1978. Isolation and characterization of starch from mature soybean. Cereal Chem 55: 661-670
  18. Maher GG. 1983. Alkali gelatinization of starches. Starch 35: 226-230 https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19830350703
  19. Kim SK, Chung HM, Cho MH. 1984. Alakli gelatinization of rice, arrow root and ginger root starches. Agric Chem Biotechnol 27: 214-216
  20. Lindqvist I. 1979. Cold gelatimization of starch. Starch 31: 195-200 https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19790310605
  21. Higo A, Shmazaki M, Noguchi S. 1982. Hardening of food texture induced by microwave irradiation (part 6): Formation of starch-fatty acid methyl ester complexes. J Home Economics Jpn 33: 297-303
  22. Cura JA, Krisman CR. 1990. Cereal grains: A study of their $\alpha$-1,4, $\alpha$-1,6 glucopolysaccharide composition. Starch 42: 171-176 https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19900420503
  23. Seo KS, Hab PJ, Lee SJ. 1974. Studies on the processing of chestnut. Korean J Food Sci Technol 6: 98-108
  24. Lee HS, Rhee HS. 1990. Physicochemical properties of acorn and chestnut starches. Korean J Soc Food Sci 6: 1-7
  25. Takeda C, Takeda Y, Hizukuri S. 1987. Structure and properties of chestnut starch. J Jpn Soc Starch Sci 34: 31-37 https://doi.org/10.5458/jag1972.34.31
  26. Kuge T, Kitamura S. 1985. Annealing of starch granules; Warm water treatment and heat-moisture treatment. J Jpn Soc Starch Sci 32: 65-83 https://doi.org/10.5458/jag1972.32.65
  27. Ishida N, Kobayashi T, Kainuma K. 1988. Studies on the physical state of water in starch gel. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi 35: 98-104 https://doi.org/10.3136/nskkk1962.35.98
  28. Lee SK, Shin MS. 1991. Characteristics of defatted and lipid-reintroduced sweet potato starches. Korean J Food Sci Technol 23: 341-348
  29. Hitomi S, Yoshimi O, Taketoshi K. 1988. Effect of powdered green tea on qualities of bread. J Cookery Sci Japan 21: 43-47
  30. Kweon MR. 1992. Molecular structure and gel properties of legume starches. PhD Dissertation. Seoul National Uni-versity
  31. Choi CR, Kim JO, Lee Sk, Shin MS. 1995. Physicochemical properties of defatted high amylose corn starch. Agric Chem Biotechnol 38: 402-407
  32. Choi CR, Rhim JW, Park YK. 2000. Physicochemical properties of purple-fleshed sweet potato starch. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 29: 1-5

피인용 문헌

  1. Correlation between Physicochemical Properties and Peeling Ratio of Korean Chestnut vol.33, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2017.33.2.190
  2. Isolation and characterization of starches from chestnuts cultivated in three regions of Korea vol.67, pp.7-8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201500034
  3. Retrogradation kinetics of chestnut starches cultivated in three regions of Korea vol.26, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0103-5
  4. The properties and molecular structures of gusiljatbam starch compared to those of acorn and chestnut starches vol.64, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201100104
  5. Product Quality of Low-fat Sausages Manufactured with Chestnut Powder as a Fat Replacer vol.52, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2018.52.3.81
  6. 밤 자원의 가공적성 연구 vol.49, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.23093/fsi.2016.49.2.56