Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회지)

Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implementation of the Perception Process in Human‐Vehicle Interactive Models(HVIMs) Considering the Effects of Auditory Peripheral Cues

청각 주변 자극의 효과를 고려한 효율적 차량-운전자 상호 연동 모델 구현 방법론

  • Rah, Chong-Kwan (Department of Industrial Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Min-Yong (Department of Industrial Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • Published : 2006.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

HVIMs consists of simulated driver models implemented with series of mathematical functions and computerized vehicle dynamic models. To effectively model the perception process, as a part of driver models, psychophysical nonlinearity should be considered not only for the single-modal stimulus but for the stimulus of multiple modalities and interactions among them. A series of human factors experiments were conducted using the primary sensory of visual and auditory modalities to find out the effects of auditory cues in visual velocity estimation tasks. The variations of auditory cues were found to enhance/reduce the perceived intensity of velocity as the level changed. These results indicate that the conventional psychophysical power functions could not applied for the perception process of the HVIMs with multi-modal stimuli. 'Ruled surfaces' in a 3-D coordinate system(with the intensities of both kinds of stimuli and the ratio of enhancement, respectively for each coordinate) were suggested to model the realistic perception process of multi-modal HVIMs.

Keywords

References

  1. 나종관, 박민용, 참여형 멀티미디어 시스템 사용자 감성평가를 위 한 다차원 심물리학적 척도 체계, 대한인간공학회지, 23(3), 89 -99, 2004
  2. 민석기, 이경수, 운전자 운전특성 파라미터를 고려한 지능화 차량 의 차간 거리 적응 제어, 한국자동차공학회 2002년도 전기/ 전자 부문, I.T.S. 부문 학술강연논문집, 103-108, 2002
  3. 성원석, 황원걸, 임형은, 景山一郞, 차량의 조향 시뮬레이션을 위한 운전자 모델에 대한 연구, 한국자동차공학회 논문집, 10(3), 245-253, 2002
  4. Delorme, D. and Song, B., Human driver model for SmartAHS. California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-12. Institute of transportation studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2001
  5. Driver, J. and Spence, C., Crossmodal attention, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8(2), 245-253, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80147-5
  6. Duncan, J., Martens, S. and Ward, R., Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities, Nature, 387(6635), 808-810, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1038/42947
  7. Guerrier, J. H., Manivannan, P. and Nair, S. N., The role of working memory, field dependence, visual search, and reaction time in the left turn performance of older female drivers, Applied Ergonomics, 30(2), 109-119, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00017-9
  8. Hoffmann, R. E. and Mortimer, G. R., Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28(4), 415-421, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(96)00005-X
  9. Keppel, G. and Wickens, D. C., Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, a: 380-393; b: 401-428, 2004
  10. Labiale, G., Cognitive ergonomics and intelligent systems in the automobile, In Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces, edited by Noy, Y. I., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 169-177, 1997
  11. Larsen, A., McIlhagga, W., Baert, J. and Bundesen, C., Seeing or hearing? Perceptual independence, modality confusions, and crossmodal congruity effects with focused and divided attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 65(4), 568-574, 2003 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194583
  12. Luce, D. R., Where is mathematical modeling in psychology headed?, Theory and Psychology, 9(6), 723-737, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354399096001
  13. Marks, E. L. and Gescheider, A. G., Psychophysical scaling, In Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, 3rd. Ed., volume 4., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 91-101, 2002
  14. Marsden, G., Brackstone, M. and McDonald, M., Assessment of the stop and go function using real driving behavior, Proceedings of the conference of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (IEE Conf. Publ. No. 483), 76-80, 2001
  15. Middleton, H. and Westwood, D., Human interaction with automotive technologies: Specification and measurement of driver abilities, International Conference on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems, IEE, 25-37, 2001
  16. Min, B. C., Chung, S. C., Min, Y. K. and Sakamoto, K., Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator. Applied Ergonomics, 35(6), 549-556, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.002
  17. Neusser, S., Nijhuis, J., Spaanenburg, Hoefflinger, B., Franke, U. and Fritz, H., Neurocontrol for lateral vehicle guidance, IEEE Micro, 13, 57-66, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1109/40.210525
  18. Odgaard, C. E., Arieh, Y. and Marks, E. L., Crossmodal enhancement of perceived brightness: Sensory interaction versus response bias, Perception & Psychophysics, 65(1), 123-132, 2003 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194789
  19. Patton, E. P. and Anastasio, J. T., Modeling cross-modal enhancement and modality-specific suppression in multisensory neurons, Neural Computation, 15(4), 783-810, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1162/08997660360581903
  20. Park, M. and Rah, C., Human factors considerations for human-vehicle interactive models to enhance safety of intelligent vehicles, Proceedings of the XIX Annual International Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 27-29 June, 46-51, 2005
  21. Penhallegon, J. W., Effects of display type, age, and gender on driving performance and simulator-induced sickness in a medium-fidelity driving simulator. M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 2003
  22. Prokop, G., Model of human vehicle driving - A predictive nonlinear opti mization approach. California-PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-RR- 2000-19. Institute of transportation studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2000
  23. Prokop, G., A human model using continuous model predictive optimization, Proceedings of the Conference of the Driver in the 21th Century, Berlin, VDI report vol. 1613, 219-237, 2001
  24. Rogers, A. W., Lee, D. M. and Fisk, D. A., Contextual effects on general learning, feature learning, and attention strengthening in visual search, Human Factors, 37(1), 158-172, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049507
  25. Stanney, M. K., Hale, S. K., Nahmens, I. and Kennedy S. R., What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: Influences of gender, body mass index, and past experience, Human Factors, 45(3), 504-520, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.3.504.27254
  26. Stein, E. B., London, N., Wilkinson, K. L. and Price, D. D., Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: A psychophysical analysis, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 497-506, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.497
  27. Stevens, S. S., Issues in psychophysical measurement, Psychological Review, 78(5), 426-450, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031324
  28. Stevens, S. S., Perceptual magnitude and its measurement, In Carterette, E. C. and Friedman, M. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception, Academic Press, London, 361-364, 1974
  29. Strayer, L. D. and Drews, A. F., Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers, Human Factors, 46(4), 640-649, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.4.640.56806
  30. Trick, M. L., Enns, T. J., Mills, J. and Vavrik, J., Paying attention behind the wheel: a framework for studying the role of attention in driving, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(5), 385- 424, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220412331298938
  31. Underwood, G., Crundall, D. and Chapman, P., Selective searching while driving: the role of experience in hazard detection and general surveillance, Ergonomics, 45(1), 1-12, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110110610
  32. Wickens, D. C. and Hollands, G. J., Engineering psychology and human performance 3rd Ed. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 260-261, 2000