Asia pacific journal of information systems

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지

The SPI Factors Affecting on Organizational Maturity Level: The Perspectives of Organizational Members and Assessment Types

소프트웨어 프로세스 개선의 영향요인이 조직의 성숙도에 미치는 영향 : 구성원 유형 및 심사 유형의 관점에서

  • 김인재 (동국대학교 경영대학 경영정보학과) ;
  • 윤재욱 (한국외국어대학교 산업정보시스템공학부) ;
  • 전용범 (동국대학교 경영대학 경영정보학과)
  • Published : 2006.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Software companies try to upgrade the level of technology and quality of their products by adopting Software Process Improvement (SPI). First of all, the companies must understand affecting factors based on various environmental view points in order to acquire competitive advantage. In this study, a research model gets started on the basis of literature reviews, and identifies SPI factors that affect the maturity levels of organizations. Organizational members and assessment types are chosen as moderating factors. An empirical research has been made for analyzing the causal relationships among affecting factors and CMM levels. The results of this study will suggest several implications to decision makers who handle SPI issues.

Keywords

References

  1. 김성희, 이경아, 이주헌, "소프트웨어 프로세스 개선 노력이 국내 SI업체의 경쟁우의에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구," 정보기술과 데이터베이스 저널, 제9권 제3호, 2002, pp. 113-127
  2. 김정욱, 나미자, 남기찬, 박수용, "SW프로세스 성숙 수준이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구," 한국경영과학회지, 제27권 제3호, 2002, pp. 1-19
  3. 윤재욱, 김인재, "소프트웨어 프로세스 개선활동이 조직성과에 미치는 영향," 한국경영과학회지, 제31권 제1호, 2006, pp. 37- 53
  4. 이상엽, 소프트웨어 프로세스 성숙도가 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구, 한국외국어대학교 박사학위논문, 2000
  5. 정학종, 김도균, 박남직, "CMM과 프로세스 개선 사례," 한국정보과학회지, 제17권 제1호, 1999, pp. 23-24
  6. Baddoo, N. and Hall, T., "Motivators of Software Process Improvement: An Analysis of Practitioners' views," Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 62, 2002, pp. 85-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00125-X
  7. Beecham, S., Hall, T., and Rainer, A., "Software Process Improvement Problems in Twelve Software Companies: an Empirical Analysis," Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 8, 2003, pp.7-42 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021764731148
  8. Chrissis, M., Konrad, M., and Shrum, S., CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement, Addison Wesley, 2003
  9. Deephouse, C., Mukhopahyay, T., Goldeson, D. R., and Kellner, M. I., "Software Process and Project Performance," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, 1996, pp. 187-205 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518106
  10. Dyba, T., "An Instrument for Measuring the Key Factors of Success in Software Process Improvement," Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 5, 2000, pp. 357-390 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009800404137
  11. El Emam, K. and Birk, A., "Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measures of software development process capability," The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 51, 2000, pp. 119-149 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00117-X
  12. Goldenson, D.R. and Herbsleb, J.D., After the appraisal: a systematic survey of process improvement, its benefits and factors that influence success, CMU/SEI-95-TR-009, Software Engineering Institute, 1995
  13. Haley, T. J., "Software Process Improvement at Raytheon," IEEE Software, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1996, pp. 33-41
  14. Hall, T., Rainer, A., and Baddoo, N., "Implementing Software Process Improvement: an Empirical Study," Software Process Improvement and Practice, Vol. 7, 2002, pp. 3-15 https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.150
  15. Herbsleb, J., Zubrow, D., Goldenson, D., Hayes, W., and Paulk, M, "Software quality and the capability maturity model," Communications of ACM, Vol. 40, No. 6, 1997, pp.30-40
  16. Humphrey, W., Managing the Software Process, Addison-Wesley, 1989
  17. Humphrey, W., Snyder, T., and Willis, R., "Software Process Improvement at Hughes Aircraft," IEEE Software, Vol. 8, 1991, pp. 11- 23 https://doi.org/10.1109/52.300031
  18. ISO/IEC 15504, Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 1: Concept and Vocabulary, 2004
  19. ISO/IEC 15504, Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 2: Performing an Assessment, 2002
  20. Krasner, H., The Payoff for Software Process Improvement: What It Is and How to Get It: Elements of Software Process Assessment & Improvement, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1999
  21. Krishnan, M. S. and Kellner, M. I., "Measuring Process Consistency: Implications for Reducing Software Defects," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 25, 1999, pp. 800-815 https://doi.org/10.1109/32.824401
  22. Niazi, M., Wilson, D., and Zowghi, D., "A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement: an empirical study," The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 74, 2005, pp. 155- 172 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2003.10.017
  23. Paulk, M., Weber, C., Curtis, B., and Chrissis, M., The Capability Maturity Model: Guideline for Improving the Software Process, Addison Wesley, 1994
  24. Rainer, A. and Hall, T., "Key Success Factors for Implementing Software Process Improvement: a Maturity based Analysis," The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 62, 2002, pp. 71-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00122-4
  25. Standish Group, Chaos-the state of the software industry, Standish Group International, Technical Report. 1995, pp. 1-11
  26. Stelzer, D. and Mellis, W., "Success Factors of Organizational Change in Software Process Improvement," Software Process Improvement and Practice, Vol. 4, 1998, pp. 227-250 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1670(199812)4:4<227::AID-SPIP106>3.0.CO;2-1