Assessment of Best Available Technology of Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Leather Tanning and Finishing Industry

가죽, 모피가공 및 제조시설의 폐수처리시설 BAT평가

  • Received : 2005.08.17
  • Accepted : 2005.10.17
  • Published : 2006.01.30

Abstract

The effluent limitations for individual industry based on the best available technology economically achievable (BAT) have been required to achieve effective regulation. BAT assessment criteria that are suitable for the circumstances of Korean industry were developed in the previous study. The criteria were applied to determine the BAT for leather tanning and finishing industry. For the evaluation BAT, a subcategorization for the industry considering wastewater characteristics, source equipments, raw material and so on should be suggested. Three subcategories: A) Unharing, Chrome Tan, Retan-Wet Finish, B) Chrome Tan, Retan-Wet Finish, and C) Furskins were proposed in this study. Wastewater discharged from the each category contains high concentration of COD, chrome, nitrogen and sulfide. In particular, the concentration of nitrogen from the subcategory A is significantly greater. Twenty sites were surveyed and wastewater qualities were analyzed. Therefore, six different technologies were applied to the subcategory A for the end-of-pipe treatment technology, and a technology was used in the subcategory B and C, respectively. The technology candidates were evaluated in terms of environmental impacts, economically achievability, treatment performance and economical reasonability. As the result, the technology options for each subcategories: A) primary chemical precipitation + modified Ludzack-Ettinger process (MLE) + secondary chemical precipitation, B) chemical precipitation + typical activated-sludge process + Fenton oxidation, C) chemical precipitation + typical activated-sludge process + batch Fenton oxidation or batch activated carbon treatment were selected as the BAT, respectively.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 환경부

References

  1. 김영노, 임병진, 권오상, 처리기술수준 근거의 폐수배출허용 기준 설정을 위한 BAT평 가 도입방안, 한국육수학회지, 38(3), pp. 281-288 (2005)
  2. 일본 환경성, 수질오탁방지법, http://law.e-gov.go.jp/thmldata/s46/ s45/s45hoI38.html (accessed Jun 2005)
  3. 일본 환경청, 내분비계장애울질에 대한 분석방법(Speed 98) (1998)
  4. 임재명, 이상호, 정재춘, 유태종, 이장훈, 원찬휘, 배해룡, 김 동일, 산업폐수처리공학, 동화기술 pp. 432-437 (2003)
  5. 통계청, 한국표준산업분류, http://www.nso.go.kr/newnso/standard/ industry/industry.html (accessed lun 2005)
  6. 환경부, 수질오염공정시험방법 (2000)
  7. 환경부 , 2001 폐수배출시절조사 (2002)
  8. 환경부, 환경통계연감 제16호 (2003)
  9. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. (1998)
  10. European Commission (EC), The impact of Best Available Techniques (BAT) on the Competitiveness of European Industry (2001)
  11. Hill, R., Lepow, S., Levine, M., Michaud, J., Neugeboren, S., Siciliano, C. and Witt, R., Outline of Clean Water Act (1996)
  12. US EPA, Development Document for the Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category (2000a)
  13. US EPA, Leather Tanning and Finishing Industry Effluent Guidelines, 40 CFR 425 (2005)
  14. US EPA, Technical Development Document for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category (2000b)