(AO)2 SBBR과 A2O SBBR에서 영양염류 제거 특성 비교

A Comparison of Nutrient Removal Characteristics between (AO)2 SBBR and A2O SBBR

  • 박영식 (대구대학교 보건과학부) ;
  • 김동석 (대구가톨릭대학교 환경과학과)
  • Park, Young-Seek (Division of health Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Seog (Department of Environmental Science, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 투고 : 2005.06.20
  • 심사 : 2006.03.08
  • 발행 : 2006.05.30

초록

This study was carried out to compare the performance of two types of sequencing batch biofilm reactors (SBBRs), anoxic-oxic-anoxic-oxic $(AO)_2$ SBBR and anoxic-oxic-anoxic $A_2O$ SBBR, on the biological nutrient removal. The TOC removal efficiency in $A_2O$ SBBR was higher than that in $(AO)_2$ SBBR. At the 1st non-aeration period, the release of ${PO_4}^{3-}-P$ in $A_2O$ SBBR was higher than that in $(AO)_2$ SBBR because of the high TOC removal. At the 1st aeration-period, the nitrification was not completed in $(AO)_2$ SBBR, however, it was completed in $A_2O$ SBBR and the nitrification rate in $A_2O$ SBBR was higher than that in $(AO)_2$ SBBR. The release and uptake of ${PO_4}^{3-}-P$ in $A_2O$ SBBR was much higher than in $(AO)_2$ SBBR. Also, the profiles of DO and pH in reactors were used to monitor the biological nutrient removal in two SBBRs. The break point in DO and pH curves at the aeration period coincided with the end of nitrification.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 대구가톨릭대학교

참고문헌

  1. 김동한, 정태학, SBR 공정에서 온도가 처리효율에 미치는 영향, 상하수도학회지, 1, pp. 11-24 (1992)
  2. 하청근, 최충식, 연속회분식공법에 의한 도축장 폐수 처리, 환경관리학회지, 5(2), pp. 369-375 (1999)
  3. APHA, AWWA and WPCF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th (1992)
  4. Cheng, N., Lo, K. V. and Yip, K. H., Swine Wastewater Treatment in a Two Stage Sequencing Batch Reactor using Real-Time Control, J. Environ. Sci. Health, B35(3), pp. 379-398 (2000)
  5. Gieseke, A., Arnz, P., Amann, R. and Schramm, A., Simultaneous P and N Removal in a Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor: Insights from Reactor- and Microscale Investigation, Water Research, 36, pp. 501-509 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00232-9
  6. Irvine, R. L. and Ketchum, L. H., Sequencing Batch Reactors for Biological Wastewater Treatment, Crit. Rev. Envir. Engrg., 18, pp. 255-294 (1988)
  7. Irvine, R. L., Wilderer, P. A. and Flemming, F. C., Controlled Unsteady State Processes and Technologies- An Overview, Water Sci. Tech., 35(1), pp. 1-10 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1021/es000996d
  8. Kim, H., Hao, O. J. and McAvoy, T. J., SBR System for Phosphorus Removal: ASM2 and Simplified Linear Model, J. Environ. Eng., Feb., pp. 98-104 (2001)
  9. Ra, C. S., Lo, K. V. and Mavinic, D. S., Real-time Control of Two-Stage Sequencing Batch Reactor System for the Treatment of Animal Wastewater, Environ. Technol., 19, pp. 343-356 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331908616690
  10. Robertson, L. A. and Kuenen, J. G. : Nitrogen Removal from Water Waste. In Microbial control of pollution, ed. Fry, J. C., Gadd, G. M., Herbert, R. A., Jones, C. W. and Watson-Craik, I. A., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
  11. Wilderer, P. A., Arnz, P. and Arnold, E., Application of Biofilms and Biofilm Support Materials as a Temporary Sink and Source, Water Air Soil Pollut., 123(1-4), pp. 147-158 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005237617334
  12. Zhao, H. W., Mavinic, D. S., Oldham, W. K. and Koch, F. A., Controlling Factors for Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification in a Two-Stage Intermittent Aeration Process Treating Domestic Sewage, Wat. Res., 33(4), pp. 961-970 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00292-9