The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

In vitro cytotoxicity of self-etching primers

자가 산부식 프라이머의 세포독성에 관한 실험적 연구

  • Rhee, Chang-Hoon (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, In-Ryeon (Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry. Research Institute for Oral Biotechnology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Gyoo-Cheon (Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry. Research Institute for Oral Biotechnology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Sik (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry. Research Institute for Oral Biotechnology, Pusan National University) ;
  • Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry. Research Institute for Oral Biotechnology, Pusan National University)
  • 이창훈 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 김인령 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강해부학교실, 구강생물공학연구소) ;
  • 김규천 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강해부학교실, 구강생물공학연구소) ;
  • 김성식 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실, 구강생물공학연구소) ;
  • 손우성 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실, 구강생물공학연구소)
  • Published : 2006.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: Several ions and components are released from self-etching primers in the oral cavity. This may cause injury to the periodontal tissues throughout orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the cytotoxicity of self-etching primers to HGF-1, HaCaT, and RHEK cells. Method: Transbond XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), and self-etching primers, Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan), Transbond Plus SEP (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), and Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), were evaluated by MTT assay, and cellular changes were also observed. Results: In all cells after 72 hours with all primers, severe morphological changes such as atrophy and necrosis were observed. In the MTT assay using HGF-1, Clearfil SE Bond, Transbond XT Primer, Transbond Plus SEP, and Adper Prompt L-Pop were lined up in order of ascending cytotoxicity When using HaCaT, Clearfil SE Bond, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Transbond Plus SEP, and Transbond XT Primer were lined up in order of ascending cytotoxicity. When using RHEK, Clearfil SE Bond, Transbond XT Primer, Adper Prompt L-Pop, and Transbond Plus SEP were lined up in order of ascending cytotoxicity. Conclusion: The result of this study shows that care is needed because self-etching primers show cytotoxic properties similar to conventional primers.

자가 산부식 프라이머는 세포독성이 있는 것으로 알려져 있어 교정치료를 하는 동안 치주조직에 손상을 일으킬 수 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 자가 산부식 프라이머가 치주조직에 미치는 영향을 평가해 보고 이를 전통적인 접착법에 사용되는 프라이머와 비교하기 위하여 시행되었다. 시편은 임상에서 브라켓 접착 시 사용하는 Transbond XT Adhesive (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA)를 각각 Transbond XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), Clearfil SE bond (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan), Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer, Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA)과 혼합한 후 광중합하여 제작하였고, Transbond XT Adhesive를 중합한 대조군과 비교하였다. 이를 배양된 HGF-1 (Human eingiva Fibroblast), HaCaT (Human Keratinocyte cell line), RHEK (immorialized Human Epidermal Keratinocyte)에 노출시킨 후 세포의 형태 변화를 관찰하였고, MTT assay를 시행하여 세포독성을 비교, 평가하였다. 실험결과 72시간 후 HGF-1, HaCaT, RHEK를 이용한 실험에서 모든 프라이머의 세포독성이 높게 나타나 세포 돌기의 위축, 세포 형태의 변화, 세포 수의 감소, 세포의 괴사가 관찰되었다. MTT assay 실험 시 HGF-1 을 이용한 실험에서 Clearfil SE Bond, Transbond XT Primer, Transbond Plus SEP, Adper Prompt L-Pop의 순으로 세포독성이 높게 나타났고, HaCaT를 이용한 실험에서 Cleafil SE Bond, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Transbond Plus SEP, Transbond XT Primer 순으로 세포독성이 높게 나타났으며, RHEK를 이용한 실험에서 Clearfil SE Bond, Transbond XT Primer, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Transbond Plus SEP 순으로 세포독성이 높게 나타났다. 자가 산부식프라이머는 전통적으로 사용되는 프라이머와 마찬가지로 세포독성이 유의하게 높으므로 구강내 사용시 주의가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  2. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy C. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a self-etching primer combined with a resin-modified glass ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:703-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.041
  3. Zeppieri IL, Chung CH, Mante FK. Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:414-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00405-0
  4. Arnold RW, Combe EC, Warford JH Jr. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:274-6 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125712
  5. Trites B, Foley TF, Banting D. Bond strength comparison of 2 self-etching primers over a 3-month storage period. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126:709-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.032
  6. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:621-4 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113269
  7. Grubisa HS, Heo G, Raboud D, Glover KE, Major PW. An evaluation and comparison of orthodontic bracket bond strengths achieved with self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:213-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.016
  8. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999;24:172-80
  9. Fritz UB, Diedrich P, Finger WJ. Self-etching primers-an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique? J Orofac Orthop 2001;62:238-45 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001931
  10. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 1998;26:609-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00046-8
  11. Imazato S, Tarumi H, Ebi N, Ebisu S. Cytotoxic effects of composite restorations employing self-etching primers or experimental antibacterial primers. J Dent 2000;28:61-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00039-1
  12. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005;21;895-910 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001
  13. Kawata Y, Shiota M, Tsutsui H, Yoshida Y, Sasaki H, Kinouchi Y. Cytotoxicity of Pd-Co dental casting ferromagnetic alloys. J Dent Res 1981;60:1403-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600080301
  14. Spangberg L. Kinetic and quantitative evaluation of material cytotoxicity in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;35:389-401 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(73)90077-7
  15. Browne RM, Tyas MJ. Biological testing of dental restorative materials in vitro-a review. J Oral Rehabil 1979;6:365-74 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1979.tb00417.x
  16. Kawahara H, Imanishi Y, Oshima H. Biological evaluation on glass ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1979;58:1080-6 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345790580030901
  17. Bean TA, Zhuang WC, Tong PY, Eick JD, Chappelow CC, Yourtee DM. Comparison of tetrazolium colorimetric and $^{51}Cr$ release assays for cytotoxicity determination of dental biomaterials. Dent Mater 1995;11:327-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80029-8
  18. Yoshii E. Cytotoxie effects of acrylates and methacrylates: relationships of monomer structures and eytotoxieity. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:517-24 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19971215)37:4<517::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-5
  19. Cook JA, Mitehell JB. Viability measurements in mammalian cell systems. Anal Biochem 1989;179:1-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(89)90191-7
  20. Tyas MJ. A method for the in vitro toxicity testing of dental restorative materials. J Dent Res 1977;56:1285-90 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345770560103401
  21. Craig RG, Hanks CT. Reaction of fibroblasts to various dental casting alloys. J Oral Pathol 1988;17:341-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1988.tb01547.x
  22. Helgeland K, Leirskar J. A further testing of the effect of dental materials on growth and adhesion of animal cells in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1972;80:206-12
  23. Ko YM, Kim KN, Kim KM. Dental materials. Seoul: Koonja Pub; 2001. p. 67-70
  24. Tang AT, Liu Y, Bjorkman L, Ekstrand J. In vitro cytotoxicity of orthodontic bonding resins on human oral fibroblasts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:132-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70209-X
  25. Lee WC, Park SB. In vitro cytotoxicity of four kinds orthodontic band cements. Korea J orthod 2004;34;351-62
  26. Szep S, Kunkel A, Ronge K, Heidemann D. Cytotoxicity of modern dentin adhesives-in vitro testing on gingival fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:53-60 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10083
  27. Tell RT, Sydiskis RJ, Isaacs RD, Davidson WM. Long-term cytotoxicity of orthodontic direct-bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:419-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90101-1